You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
October 31 2025 12.53am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 679 of 1255 < 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 >

Topic Locked

Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 05 Nov 20 6.02pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

 

COYP
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
The Dolphin Flag 05 Nov 20 6.24pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

How many police does it take to arrest one Woman!
Jeez they do it so wrong don't they.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
dannyboy1978 Flag 05 Nov 20 6.31pm Send a Private Message to dannyboy1978 Add dannyboy1978 as a friend

It's more like a communist state.
Remember when it first started with hospitals over flowing, people in corridors? None of that anymore.
This all stinks.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
cryrst Flag The garden of England 05 Nov 20 6.48pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Maybe she's one of the many people who have no job to return to, since this lockdown 2 is the final straw for many small businesses. Therefore, she has the time to look after her mother for the rest of her remaining life.

Shes a nurse or ex nurse and is 72.
Why not take her mother out when she retired
Why wait until now. If she hasnt got the correct safety systems in place then her mum could be in danger. Aside of the potential to take C19 back to the home when she realises she cannot cope.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
cryrst Flag The garden of England 05 Nov 20 6.52pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

How many police does it take to arrest one Woman!
Jeez they do it so wrong don't they.

There was a report of assault by staff employees.
The police had to attend and released her without charge so she wasnt arrested really. She was removed from the scene.
What actually happened we dont know, again we are fed a narrative which helps to dis any and anyone in authority.
Maybe we need a purge!

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Tom-the-eagle Flag Croydon 05 Nov 20 6.55pm

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

She should have closed the gym. Stupid woman

 

"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit
Alert Alert a moderator to this post
cryrst Flag The garden of England 05 Nov 20 7.06pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Tom-the-eagle

She should have closed the gym. Stupid woman

Dont be silly tom.
It's only the law!!!

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Lombardinho Flag London 05 Nov 20 7.25pm Send a Private Message to Lombardinho Add Lombardinho as a friend

Originally posted by dannyboy1978

Well worth a watch

Remarkable.
Brave girl.
I suspect there are many working for the same employer who are itching to spread the word.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 05 Nov 20 7.27pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Shes a nurse or ex nurse and is 72.
Why not take her mother out when she retired
Why wait until now. If she hasnt got the correct safety systems in place then her mum could be in danger. Aside of the potential to take C19 back to the home when she realises she cannot cope.

You assume that she was retired. You think she may put her mother in danger, assuming that she hasn't put in the safety systems. And you assume that she has not had a test to assess if she has the virus. Now though, with this arrest, we have a frightened elderly person, who is more likely to get infected due to the arrest, being taken back to be alone from her family, who she may never see again, and possibly infect the rest of the residents. You make a lot of assumtions but can't see anything other than her realising that she cannot cope. She was a nurse. How would she not cope?

 

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
cryrst Flag The garden of England 05 Nov 20 7.37pm Send a Private Message to cryrst Add cryrst as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

You assume that she was retired. You think she may put her mother in danger, assuming that she hasn't put in the safety systems. And you assume that she has not had a test to assess if she has the virus. Now though, with this arrest, we have a frightened elderly person, who is more likely to get infected due to the arrest, being taken back to be alone from her family, who she may never see again, and possibly infect the rest of the residents. You make a lot of assumtions but can't see anything other than her realising that she cannot cope. She was a nurse. How would she not cope?

Her daughter was on the wireless this morning.
Saying basically that nan walked back in to the home right as rain and not phased. She also admitted her mum and her didnt really consider the duty of care about safety. I didnt hear whether she was retired or not so she could still be working.
How she could care for her mum is strange if it was the case! Read what's written and it may not be the actual truth. Hearing it first hand puts it in perspective. My main question earlier was if they are that desperate why not remove the nan years ago. Why wait until it is nearly impossible. I would guess it's not cheap or easy to look after a person with dementia so to me it seems like the family wants to run with the hound and play with the fox.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
jeeagles Flag 05 Nov 20 7.47pm

If the purpose of lockdown was to ensure the NHS doesn't get overrun. Currently, we have plenty of capacity of COVID patients whilst mental health services (amongst others) are completely overrun. Surely lockdown is having an adverse affect on the NHS rather than protecting it.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 05 Nov 20 8.21pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by cryrst

Her daughter was on the wireless this morning.
Saying basically that nan walked back in to the home right as rain and not phased. She also admitted her mum and her didnt really consider the duty of care about safety. I didnt hear whether she was retired or not so she could still be working.
How she could care for her mum is strange if it was the case! Read what's written and it may not be the actual truth. Hearing it first hand puts it in perspective. My main question earlier was if they are that desperate why not remove the nan years ago. Why wait until it is nearly impossible. I would guess it's not cheap or easy to look after a person with dementia so to me it seems like the family wants to run with the hound and play with the fox.

I didn't hear that interview. But on digging further there seems to be more this. It seems that the daughter has power of attourney over her mother's finances but not her health. Which raises more questions. But my point really is, if you can look after your own family, you should be allowed to. If there are fees involved, even more so.

 

Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 679 of 1255 < 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic