You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tax on pensioners proposed
May 24 2024 2.07pm

Tax on pensioners proposed

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 7 of 18 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

 

View Lyons550's Profile Lyons550 Flag Shirley 08 May 18 5.21pm Send a Private Message to Lyons550 Add Lyons550 as a friend

Originally posted by .TUX.

The problem is that we've had over 40yrs of a fiat-currency (forced upon us) and the subsequent inflation, around 1300% since the 70's, that it brings.
The more that is printed the more the existing currency is devalued ie it has less worth.

This is the real issue that, as far as i'm aware, is never ever mentioned let alone addressed.



Very true...heard someone say on teh radio this morning that their wages had pretty much doubled since they started work and yet the ratio of affordability for houses has gone from 2.5/1 up to 5+/1

 


The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
.TUX. Flag 08 May 18 5.55pm

Originally posted by Lyons550


Very true...heard someone say on teh radio this morning that their wages had pretty much doubled since they started work and yet the ratio of affordability for houses has gone from 2.5/1 up to 5+/1

Boring but important......

At one point in the 70's the average wage was £30.
Had you put half in the bank and bought 1oz of Gold with the other half then your money in the bank would today be worth around £300 (at best!) but the 1oz of Gold would be worth around £1000 (it'd be more but as with everything outside of the financial system it's manipulated down).
Yes Gold fluctuates, but in the long term it is always a better store of value than any given fiat-currency. This is why it has been used for over 5000yrs and also the reason every country/govt/central bank hold it.
Saving fiat-currency long-term ie for pensions etc is pointless, particularly at this moment in time when fiat is nearing the end..........but the banks/financial system will never tell you that.

They'll also never tell you how much they value Gold.

 


Buy Litecoin.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Spiderman's Profile Spiderman Flag Horsham 08 May 18 6.32pm Send a Private Message to Spiderman Add Spiderman as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

My point is that, having paid tax all their lives, it seems a ridiculous notion that they should now have to pay more just to stick ten grand in the back pockets of kids, a luxury they themselves were not afforded.

I am now retired having worked for 43 years, but do not get my state pension foe another 4 years. I have a Civil Service pension (not gold plated as the Mail would have you believe) I do occasional part-time work.
I have 2 children who have just completed University education, £10000 will not help a great deal to get them on the property ladder, however what would have helped was scrapping tuition fees. My daughter completed a masters degree (now working in space industry) and left with over £50000 debt which, from the time she started her course, has been accrueing approx 6% interest. If the Govt are concerned about the youth scrap these fees or at the very least the outrageous interest rate

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 08 May 18 6.43pm Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by Spiderman

I am now retired having worked for 43 years, but do not get my state pension foe another 4 years. I have a Civil Service pension (not gold plated as the Mail would have you believe) I do occasional part-time work.
I have 2 children who have just completed University education, £10000 will not help a great deal to get them on the property ladder, however what would have helped was scrapping tuition fees. My daughter completed a masters degree (now working in space industry) and left with over £50000 debt which, from the time she started her course, has been accrueing approx 6% interest. If the Govt are concerned about the youth scrap these fees or at the very least the outrageous interest rate

Sounds to me like she just needs to roll her sleeves up and work a bit harder.

(Tongue very firmly in cheek).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Bobtail's Profile Bobtail Flag Crowborough 08 May 18 10.02pm Send a Private Message to Bobtail Add Bobtail as a friend

As a pensioner, and not a very well off one, I don't see how paying more tax would help anyone.

More tax = less income = less expenditure = less jobs = more unemployment = less tax.

 


Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the.universal's Profile the.universal 08 May 18 10.12pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Why should they pay more? They've been paying all their lives.

We all pay all our lives. That’s the way taxes work. Many pensioners are very well of due largely to the booming post-war economy and final salary pensions. They are more well off than many of the younger generation, which is why they should pay more.

Are you a pensioner yourself? I don’t expect turkeys to vote for Christmas, but the answer to that question is very important. Fairness in taxation must be looked at unemotionally.

Incidentally, my taxes went up recently due to my circumstances, a move which I wholeheartedly supported.

 


Vive le Roy!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the.universal's Profile the.universal 08 May 18 10.22pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

I guess that I come within your idea of a wealthy pensioner but a huge chunk of my income already goes to HMRC in the form of income tax. Do you expect me to pay even more?

Tax increases are never an easy decision, but the fact remains that the baby boomer generation will be the first in history to earn more than their children. So who should be taxed more if not wealthy pensioners?

 


Vive le Roy!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the.universal's Profile the.universal 08 May 18 10.25pm Send a Private Message to the.universal Add the.universal as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
After removing rent or mortgage housing costs, £20 a week better off. Wow.

It’s ok to admit you were wrong.

 


Vive le Roy!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HeathMan's Profile HeathMan Flag Purley 08 May 18 10.28pm Send a Private Message to HeathMan Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add HeathMan as a friend

While I have not read every post, I recognise that many pensioners do have more spare money than younger people.

We are all paying foo much for property with only the bank of mum and dad making property purchase possible for some.

The upward pressure on house purchase and rental prices needs to be curtailed - giving young people £10,000.00 would contribute to the pressure, student loan debt, and making the passing of funds from the bank of mum and dad a money laundering offence would reduce the pressure.

Older peoples' surplus (to daily needs) money when spent does stimulate the economy in many ways that Government control (taking funds away from them) would not.

rthe young w w

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View SW19 CPFC's Profile SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 08 May 18 10.36pm Send a Private Message to SW19 CPFC Add SW19 CPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I detect this idea in several of these posts that.....If someone has lived their life responsibly and done all the right things....that the state should reward them....you know, their people and all that.

I have some sympathy for this view but it's not really a sustainable nor healthy way to run a country.

The fact is the country is called Great Britain and it's about the British.....not just Mr or Mrs/Ms/Miss Sensible....you run the country for the brightest and thickest, most able and least able.

Mr and Mrs Sensible didn't live their lives responsibly for the benefit of the state. They lived it sensibly purely for the benefit of themselves....like sensible people do. If they also had decent luck they received the rewards that came from that.

Agreed

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Penge Eagle's Profile Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 08 May 18 10.51pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

The average Millennial complains about house prices... When I ask them how much property deposit have they built up so far, they answer "zero"! (They also insist on living in zones 1-2). Baby boomers and Generation X actually saved money, didn't go away on fancy holidays and didn't eat at expensive restaurants which they post on Instagram. It's easy to blame the market and the government, but what are YOU doing about your financial future? I'm planning for retirement now. The elderly have by and large been responsible with their finances and should not be punished. The government STEAL enough money as it is...

Edited by Penge Eagle (08 May 2018 11.02pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 08 May 18 10.54pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Originally posted by HeathMan

While I have not read every post, I recognise that many pensioners do have more spare money than younger people.

We are all paying foo much for property with only the bank of mum and dad making property purchase possible for some.

The upward pressure on house purchase and rental prices needs to be curtailed - giving young people £10,000.00 would contribute to the pressure, student loan debt, and making the passing of funds from the bank of mum and dad a money laundering offence would reduce the pressure.

Older peoples' surplus (to daily needs) money when spent does stimulate the economy in many ways that Government control (taking funds away from them) would not.

rthe young w w

If 'Mum and Dad' have all this spare money to inflate the property market, then maybe the Resolution Foundation should be recommending extra taxes on parents, not on pensioners.

Edited by YT (08 May 2018 10.58pm)

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 7 of 18 < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Tax on pensioners proposed