Topic

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 741 of 2586 < 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 >

Topic Locked

hedgehog50 Croydon 23 Aug 17 6.41pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Eurozone recovering with inward investment and in particular manufacturing growth with factory closures 19% up. Pound on the slide against the euro looks now like a permanent devaluation. Investment on hold in the UK as result of brexit the Chancellor admits. Is that good? We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]
Alert a moderator to this post

hedgehog50

Croydon 23 Aug 17 6.41pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Eurozone recovering with inward investment and in particular manufacturing growth with factory closures 19% up.

Pound on the slide against the euro looks now like a permanent devaluation.

Investment on hold in the UK as result of brexit the Chancellor admits.

Is that good?

We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert a moderator to this post

chris123 hove actually 23 Aug 17 6.55pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 Is that good? Yes I think steely was expecting many more closures, so clearly good news eh!
Alert a moderator to this post

chris123

hove actually 23 Aug 17 6.55pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Is that good?

Yes I think steely was expecting many more closures, so clearly good news eh!

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 8.21am
Originally posted by steeleye20 Haha can't believe it. The only thing left for the brexiteers is 'taking back control' now that is gone too. Be far better off staying in the EU with the power of the veto. If you'd bothered to read what was being proposed you would understand that it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. I am all in favour of an arbitration provision being in place as the EU cannot be trusted in its negotiations and will find ways to try to screw us, look at the €100bn divorce bill Barnier pulled from his arse. Having an independent vehicle to settle disputes is good for the UK. Edited by matt_himself (24 Aug 2017 8.22am) "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 24 Aug 17 8.21am

Originally posted by steeleye20

Haha can't believe it.

The only thing left for the brexiteers is 'taking back control' now that is gone too.

Be far better off staying in the EU with the power of the veto.

If you'd bothered to read what was being proposed you would understand that it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain.

I am all in favour of an arbitration provision being in place as the EU cannot be trusted in its negotiations and will find ways to try to screw us, look at the €100bn divorce bill Barnier pulled from his arse. Having an independent vehicle to settle disputes is good for the UK.

Edited by matt_himself (24 Aug 2017 8.22am)

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 11.01am
it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 24 Aug 17 11.01am

it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain.

An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law.

Alert a moderator to this post

chris123 hove actually 24 Aug 17 11.17am
Originally posted by steeleye20 it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law. You're making up words now.
Alert a moderator to this post

chris123

hove actually 24 Aug 17 11.17am

Originally posted by steeleye20

it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain.

An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law.

You're making up words now.

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 11.56am
Originally posted by steeleye20 it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain. An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law. You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 24 Aug 17 11.56am

Originally posted by steeleye20

it is an arbitration provision, not having the ECJ direct laws in Britain.

An 'arbtration position' means the UK would not be in full control of its law.

You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.43pm
Originally posted by matt_himself You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position. The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. [Link] This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false. I used to be immortal
Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls

The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.43pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws.

[Link]

This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false.

I used to be immortal

Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.45pm
Originally posted by crystal balls The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. [Link] This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false. However, for Sir David, it is not just May's unrealistic promises regarding the ECJ that have left him frustrated, but signs that both she and the government don't fully understand its purpose and remit. "The ECJ does not have 'direct jurisdiction' in or over the UK," the former ECJ judge tells BI. "What it has is the jurisdiction to answer questions regarding the interpretation and application of EU law. In so far as the UK is bound by EU law, then the ECJ interpretation is binding on the UK. Correspondingly, UK courts that seek to know what the correct law is can put the question to the ECJ. The ECJ doesn't have any other jurisdiction in the UK other than to answer questions put to it by UK courts." Edited by crystal balls (24 Aug 2017 2.46pm) I used to be immortal
Alert a moderator to this post

crystal balls

The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Aug 17 2.45pm

Originally posted by crystal balls

The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws.

[Link]

This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false.

However, for Sir David, it is not just May's unrealistic promises regarding the ECJ that have left him frustrated, but signs that both she and the government don't fully understand its purpose and remit. "The ECJ does not have 'direct jurisdiction' in or over the UK," the former ECJ judge tells BI.

"What it has is the jurisdiction to answer questions regarding the interpretation and application of EU law. In so far as the UK is bound by EU law, then the ECJ interpretation is binding on the UK. Correspondingly, UK courts that seek to know what the correct law is can put the question to the ECJ. The ECJ doesn't have any other jurisdiction in the UK other than to answer questions put to it by UK courts."

Edited by crystal balls (24 Aug 2017 2.46pm)

I used to be immortal

Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself Matataland 24 Aug 17 3.09pm
Originally posted by crystal balls The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws. [Link] This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false. I didn't say the ECJ did, I was replying to Steeleye's uneducated post. Both sides misrepresented facts during the vote. Remain were just as culpable as Leave in this respect. "That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02
Alert a moderator to this post

matt_himself

Matataland 24 Aug 17 3.09pm

Originally posted by crystal balls

The ECJ have never had the position to apply laws in Britain, they mere;y advise on questions asked by British courts on European laws.

[Link]

This was one of many aspects of the EU that the Exit supporters misrepresented to the electorate which were false.

I didn't say the ECJ did, I was replying to Steeleye's uneducated post.

Both sides misrepresented facts during the vote. Remain were just as culpable as Leave in this respect.

"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.25pm
Originally posted by matt_himself You obviously don't know what 'conflict', 'law' or 'arbitration' mean. They don't mean the ECJ adjudicating or applying laws on Britain post Brexit. You just want to believe that is the case because it suits your position. Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think. But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case. that is what arbitration means.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.25pm

Originally posted by matt_himself

Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think.

But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case.

that is what arbitration means.

Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20 Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.29pm
Originally posted by hedgehog50 Is that good? Apologies factory starts are 19% up in the EU - is it because Germany Italy France are attracting investment in preference to us because the UK is now more of a risk? No need to hold back as far as they are concerned but here is just too uncertain.
Alert a moderator to this post

steeleye20

Croydon 24 Aug 17 3.29pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Is that good?

Apologies factory starts are 19% up in the EU - is it because Germany Italy France are attracting investment in preference to us because the UK is now more of a risk?

No need to hold back as far as they are concerned but here is just too uncertain.

Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset Shizzlehurst 24 Aug 17 4.17pm
Originally posted by steeleye20 Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think. But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case. that is what arbitration means. I wonder if ACAS will get involved if negotiations stall.
Alert a moderator to this post

nickgusset

Shizzlehurst 24 Aug 17 4.17pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Arbitration means the UK is not in control laws may be decided by arbitration, whoever that means not the UK or ECJ I would think.

But the UK is not in charge of its own law in that case.

that is what arbitration means.

I wonder if ACAS will get involved if negotiations stall.

Alert a moderator to this post

Topic Locked

Page 741 of 2586 < 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)

Site Map

Sponsors