This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Notice how they still use the weasel words "on balance of probabilities" - still trying to continue the smearing of his reputation. It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities"
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities" What does it mean in Kangaroo Courts?
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
this result can only mean Power to the People. But let Rafiq tell it how he sees it, . . . Edited by Forest Hillbilly (02 Apr 2023 8.00am)
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
It is a legal term. In the High Court one has to be proven "without a shadow of a doubt" but in the County Court proof only has to be in the "balance of probabilities" That's not right. Criminal matters require proof beyond reasonable doubt (80% true). Civil matters are proven on a balance of probability ie more right than wrong (+ 50%).
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly
this result can only mean Power to the People. But let Rafiq tell it how he sees it, . . . Edited by Forest Hillbilly (02 Apr 2023 8.00am) I guess it's a bit like the n word. They can use it but we can't. My missus, who's Dutch Irish, said 'Pommie Shower' the other day, I should have called for a full enquiry.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Back on topic, so often derailed by the same old bore Well worth a watch whether you're a fan of cricket or not. Essential if you're a fan of intellect and the beauty (in the right hands, certain posters take note) of the english language. Post-Rafiq, so that is referenced. 5.00 > 49:00 for Fry.
Enjoying getting up later and not having someone who knows better than me (apart from the missus of course). |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal-purley
If Fry uses some fancy language it must be true. He's so thick-skinned and completely an expert on playing cricket at a high level. He literally knows all about it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
That's not right. Criminal matters require proof beyond reasonable doubt (80% true). Civil matters are proven on a balance of probability ie more right than wrong (+ 50%). These numbers you quote are from googling and are US based
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.