Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 8 of 13 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 12.33pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.26pm Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 12.18pm Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.15pm Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 11.31am Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is. Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that. He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French. Ouch, that brings back some painful memories! I forgot to mention the industrial scale wet towel whipping in the changing rooms. Noooooooo! Now that really did used to hurt Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 12.33pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.26pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 12.18pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 12.15pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 11.31am

Quote Cucking Funt at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

What a ghastly, snivelling little sneak he is.

Indeed. If we were all back at school he'd have been bogwashed for that.

He'd be getting compasses in his ass all through double French.

Ouch, that brings back some painful memories!

I forgot to mention the industrial scale wet towel whipping in the changing rooms.

Noooooooo! Now that really did used to hurt

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

Harry Beever Newbury 18 Apr 14 12.57pm
Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought...
Alert a moderator to this post

Harry Beever

Newbury 18 Apr 14 12.57pm

Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought...

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi Catford 18 Apr 14 1.09pm
Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club. And how was he putting his job on the line ? What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text? Jesus wept. DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing. Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac. Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you. If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi

Catford 18 Apr 14 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not,

Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.

Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

Alert a moderator to this post

Plane Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.09pm
Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought... ...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought...
Alert a moderator to this post

Plane

Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.09pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm

...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought...

Alert a moderator to this post

Plane Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.12pm
Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club. And how was he putting his job on the line ? What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text? Jesus wept. DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing. Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac. Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you. If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point. Mate, you've been watching too much Law and Order
Alert a moderator to this post

Plane

Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.12pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.

Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

Mate, you've been watching too much Law and Order

Alert a moderator to this post

Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 18 Apr 14 1.12pm
Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit. Once again, HE DID NOT GO TO THE AUTHORITIES the sad little s*** went running off to OGS. Not the same thing. the dignified don't even enter in the game
Alert a moderator to this post

Y Ddraig Goch

In The Crowd 18 Apr 14 1.12pm

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.36am

Yes they will be construed as criminal acts. Like cricketers paying for weather reports. This is because betting may be involved or something that may influence the outcome of a sporting event. See what is happening all over the sporting world to get this fact. If any club are seen to breach the rules in any way, it can be seen as criminal. Of course common law will not be infringed as this is not statuary and often involves civil law, making it a case for only NGOs to enforce within their remit.

Once again, HE DID NOT GO TO THE AUTHORITIES the sad little s*** went running off to OGS. Not the same thing.

the dignified don't even enter in the game

Alert a moderator to this post

Harry Beever Newbury 18 Apr 14 1.25pm
Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought... ...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought... My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate.
Alert a moderator to this post

Harry Beever

Newbury 18 Apr 14 1.25pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm

My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate.

Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 1.28pm
Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club. And how was he putting his job on the line ? What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text? Jesus wept. DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing. Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac. Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you. If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point. No, because there are currently no ongoing proceedings (either criminal or civil) or police investigations to be 'perverted'. Some of us are getting a tad carried away Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 1.28pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.

Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

No, because there are currently no ongoing proceedings (either criminal or civil) or police investigations to be 'perverted'. Some of us are getting a tad carried away

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

Plane Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.29pm
Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought... ...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought... My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate. That's a drink isn't it?
Alert a moderator to this post

Plane

Bromley 18 Apr 14 1.29pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm

My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate.

That's a drink isn't it?

Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 1.32pm
Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.29pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought... ...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought... My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate. That's a drink isn't it? Sounds like Snowballs to me. Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert a moderator to this post

bexleydave

Barnehurst 18 Apr 14 1.32pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.29pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm

My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate.

That's a drink isn't it?

Sounds like Snowballs to me.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert a moderator to this post

SloveniaDave Tirana, Albania 18 Apr 14 1.34pm
Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 1.32pm Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.29pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm Whilst knee jerk reaction is to think "what a sneaky little prick" we don't know what the text said. If he is good mates with OGS maybe it simply said "You better have a chat with your lads mate, there's a mole in the camp." I'd like to think that was the case. He probably had no idea Tan would throw his toys out of the pram in such spectacular fashion. Just a thought... ...Or maybe he thought, I'll get even with that cvnt Parish, who, when I thought I was being smart and told him Bolton were looking at me after a nine game run, he said fair enough fvck off there and see if the grass is greener, I think my scenario is nearer the mark. Maybe you need to get over your man love for him. Just a thought... My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate. That's a drink isn't it? Sounds like Snowballs to me. Champagne Moment! Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand! My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. (Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)
Alert a moderator to this post

SloveniaDave

Tirana, Albania 18 Apr 14 1.34pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 1.32pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.29pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 1.25pm

Quote Plane at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote Harry Beever at 18 Apr 2014 12.57pm

My man love for him evaporated with the quote "I'm building something here at Palace and I'm not one to leave things half done" or whatever it was. Just playing devils advocate.

That's a drink isn't it?

Sounds like Snowballs to me.

Champagne Moment!

Just because I don't care doesn't mean I don't understand!

My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

(Member of the School of Optimism 1969-2016 inclusive)

Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi Catford 18 Apr 14 1.34pm
Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 1.28pm Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am Yes, it may be difficult for some to understand the fact of accessory to a crime , but that is exactly how DF will be viewed by the authorities if he had not disclosed his knowledge of the message he'd received. I know it doesn't rate in the Brinks Matt shape of things, but crime it is. And if there is issue about where DF sent his information, it will have ended up with the authorities, so same rule applies. Slating a bloke for being honest is not where we should be coming from. Unless others believe dishonesty is ok. We must hope not, Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club. And how was he putting his job on the line ? What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text? Jesus wept. DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing. Withholding info or denying info which can be easily traced by phone networks can easily be construed as peverting the course of justice, no? Any Lawyers amongst the HOL-osphere? I reckon lying about evidence in any case or not flagging it up could out you in a tad of trouble and the employment you're at could easily give you the tin tac. Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you. If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point. No, because there are currently no ongoing proceedings (either criminal or civil) or police investigations to be 'perverted'. Some of us are getting a tad carried away Maybe so, but who is to say things are happening in private? Police investigations into the phone's texts? All I know is that if I were in the same situation I would like to think that I would be honest than jeopardise my job and thus bringing home the bacon for me Family. Fcuk trying to be labelled as bitter. Family first. You're more of a Man in my eyes if that is done imo.
Alert a moderator to this post

eagleboi

Catford 18 Apr 14 1.34pm

Quote bexleydave at 18 Apr 2014 1.28pm

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 1.09pm

Quote SE25 at 18 Apr 2014 11.44am

Quote eagleboi at 18 Apr 2014 11.28am

Quote adrian b at 18 Apr 2014 11.20am

Great point. Why should he put his job on the line to save face.He has a Family to look after also.Can never have any bitterness to Doug after the many years of joy he has brought to my club.

And how was he putting his job on the line ?
What would be been guilty of ? Seeing a text?
Jesus wept.
DF could shag your wife and he'd still have been doing the right thing.

Jesus did weep. Don't worry, he still loves you.

If DF did shag anyone's married missus he would be committing adultery. But thanks for that facetious point.

No, because there are currently no ongoing proceedings (either criminal or civil) or police investigations to be 'perverted'. Some of us are getting a tad carried away

Maybe so, but who is to say things are happening in private? Police investigations into the phone's texts? All I know is that if I were in the same situation I would like to think that I would be honest than jeopardise my job and thus bringing home the bacon for me Family.

Fcuk trying to be labelled as bitter. Family first. You're more of a Man in my eyes if that is done imo.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 8 of 13 < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Dougie Freedman rumour! Surely not!

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors