This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by W12
Agreed and this is not well known. The Iraq war was never about oil anyway. The neocons and the Blarites naively thought that Islamic countries would want some form democracy so they could spread market stability through the region (although Blair probably wanted something more akin to Marxism) but that's just not the possible. They misunderstood the region entirely. We should have been building nuclear power stations for years but the green lobby has been successful in hamstringing the country. Energy self sufficiency is a matter of national security as Trump well understands. Green energy is just not fit for purpose and won't be for the foreseeable however much money we poor into it. Then there is the fact that the current "climate emergency" is utter bulls***. Iraq may not have been about oil, but it certainly wasn't about democracy. If it was, why did we ignore the first democratic vote which happened after Saddam was overthrown and instead put a puppet leader in charge? Iraq was a war about private banks and infrastructure companies who wanted to open a new market, but thought the enemy would be far easier to defeat than they were. Our support for the Saudis in Yemen is a good example of an oil-driven war. We also spend billions on protecting the Gulf States, who provide oil to Asian economies and are thus of incredible geopolitical importance. We continue to support regimes in Africa and South America who provide cheap oil but are creating instability in their regions. It is the basis of much of our financial markets too, which have been destroying our society for decades. As for there not being a climate emergency: how? almost the entire scientific community is agreed on this. Where's your evidence?
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by W12
Agreed and this is not well known. The Iraq war was never about oil anyway. The neocons and the Blarites naively thought that Islamic countries would want some form democracy so they could spread market stability through the region (although Blair probably wanted something more akin to Marxism) but that's just not the possible. They misunderstood the region entirely. I think we can all agree it was a complete disaster. We should have been building nuclear power stations for years but the green lobby has been successful in hamstringing the country. Energy self sufficiency is a matter of national security as Trump well understands. Green energy is just not fit for purpose and won't be for the foreseeable however much money we poor into it. Then there is the fact that the current "climate emergency" is utter bulls***. All good points. The lack of clear no nonsense thinking within our political class has cost us dear....literally.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Iraq may not have been about oil, but it certainly wasn't about democracy. If it was, why did we ignore the first democratic vote which happened after Saddam was overthrown and instead put a puppet leader in charge? Re-read what he wrote.....I'm not exactly sure what you expect....So we spend blood and money only to have a new government that doesn't work with us? However, the expectation was never to be there long....and as W12 said...it was all naive and a misjudgement of middle eastern societies. Originally posted by serial thriller
Iraq was a war about private banks and infrastructure companies who wanted to open a new market, but thought the enemy would be far easier to defeat than they were. Pretty much what he said. Originally posted by serial thriller
Our support for the Saudis in Yemen is a good example of an oil-driven war. We also spend billions on protecting the Gulf States, who provide oil to Asian economies and are thus of incredible geopolitical importance. We continue to support regimes in Africa and South America who provide cheap oil but are creating instability in their regions. It is the basis of much of our financial markets too, which have been destroying our society for decades. Yep, all done on supporting the lesser evil.....it's valid to criticise it but I've yet to hear better alternatives. Originally posted by serial thriller
As for there not being a climate emergency: how? almost the entire scientific community is agreed on this. Where's your evidence? Al Gore claimed the same thing. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Sep 2019 2.23pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Al Gore claimed the same thing. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Sep 2019 2.23pm) And 5 of the hottest years in human history have been in the last 7 years. Antarctica icecapd are melting at an observable accelerated rate. We are seeing flooding in Spain in August, temperatures of nearly 40 in Britain, the widescale destruction of the oceans and huge droughts in Africa. Yes, we're not all donning snorkelling gear yet, but that doesn't mean he was wrong.
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
And 5 of the hottest years in human history have been in the last 7 years. Antarctica icecapd are melting at an observable accelerated rate. We are seeing flooding in Spain in August, temperatures of nearly 40 in Britain, the widescale destruction of the oceans and huge droughts in Africa. Yes, we're not all donning snorkelling gear yet, but that doesn't mean he was wrong. True.....we need duel policies on cleaner emissions...I say nuclear, you say green, but as long as the outcome is the same.....and we need heavy investment on technologies. We also need population reduction outside of Europe whose native population is reducing naturally....but common sense like that just makes you a villain in a superhero movie.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
True.....we need duel policies on cleaner emissions...I say nuclear, you say green, but as long as the outcome is the same.....and we need heavy investment on technologies. So like a Green New Deal then? Originally posted by Stirlingsays
We also need population reduction outside of Europe whose native population is reducing naturally....but common sense like that just makes you a villain in a superhero movie. What the hell are you proposing? That we commit a few genocides to keep things in balance? Countries in the third world where populations are rising are often the lowest contributors to carbon emissions. The biggest are in the richest countries: maybe we should just drop a few nukes on ourselves to help solve the problem?
If punk ever happened I'd be preaching the law, instead of listenin to Lydon lecture BBC4 |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
So like a Green New Deal then? Let's not go round in circles, I've covered that. Originally posted by serial thriller
What the hell are you proposing? That we commit a few genocides to keep things in balance? Countries in the third world where populations are rising are often the lowest contributors to carbon emissions. The biggest are in the richest countries: maybe we should just drop a few nukes on ourselves to help solve the problem? Native European numbers are going down naturally. Our lifestyle is what other nations wish to copy....and probably why you buggered off to Germany rather than 'nuke' yourself. As non European countries become better developed the sheer size of their populations will make Europe's emissions pale into insignificance......Your anti white attitudes are kind of besides the point. What would I do about the third and developing world?....I'd do what China did and limit them to one child. Possibly sterilisation....I don't know I'm not being paid to provide the answers but it's hardly rocket science.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
Ah of course, sterilise the poor so the rich can continue driving gas guzzling cars and eating steak every day. Maybe we could just cut the middleman out and fuel our society with the burning corpses of African children? Serial's back everybody! Are you referring to abortion? Because that's most definitely not what I'm saying....I'm not that guy. Sterilisation isn't murdering babies. What I'm saying would result in Africans....who on their current path are going to increase in population size by 1.5 billion in 20 years.....what I propose would mean that they could actually have more highly developed societies. If you seriously think that we can have 'green deals' but billions more people on the planet and emissions will go down?....you are living in cloud cuckoo land. So sorry that real life and answers aren't sugar coated and smiley. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Sep 2019 4.48pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
|
Originally posted by Beanyboysmd
Im not a labour supporter (SNP for what its worth) but Corbyn is there for one reason, the public keep voting for him! He has blown a lot of goodwill by being nothing at all when it comes to Brexit but outside of that, he has energised the young, has a lot of old ideas that genuinely feel new again and more importantly he is not trying to turn Labour into the cool conservatives. I wouldn't vote for him, but the good he has done should not be overlooked. What, I didn't realise he was in power. As people keep voting for him - he shouldn't be worried about a general election.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by serial thriller
What the hell are you proposing? That we commit a few genocides to keep things in balance? Countries in the third world where populations are rising are often the lowest contributors to carbon emissions. The biggest are in the richest countries: maybe we should just drop a few nukes on ourselves to help solve the problem? There’s a book (and film) called Look who’s Back, where Hitler wakes up in 2013, and decided the Green Party are the ones for him to protect the next 1,000 years of the Reich. Starts off as a fun read before turning into a frightening example of what could happen. The world is indeed overpopulated, improving birth rates and better health care all around the planet. We know out of control breeding with no natural predator can destroy ecosystems.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
There’s a book (and film) called Look who’s Back, where Hitler wakes up in 2013, and decided the Green Party are the ones for him to protect the next 1,000 years of the Reich. Starts off as a fun read before turning into a frightening example of what could happen. The world is indeed overpopulated, improving birth rates and better health care all around the planet. We know out of control breeding with no natural predator can destroy ecosystems. There are low birth rates of Europeans. Not even replacing our own populations. Ireland has the highest European birth rate I believe at just over 2 per couple. I don't believe any others get to two. Any replacement population is currently made of immigrants and children of recent immigrants even in countries such as Ireland.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.