This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
I think he has been injured for months but played anyway. Not true. If his name wasn’t Wilfred Zaha he would have been watching most of our games this season, rather than playing.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
I think he has been injured for months but played anyway. Our entire tactic is pass the ball to him an hope he does something special. Currently our best chance of keeping him and getting decent performances is to sack Roy.
|
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Our entire tactic is pass the ball to him an hope he does something special. Currently our best chance of keeping him and getting decent performances is to sack Roy. You just can't help yourself, can you ? If the beer was flat in the Red and Blue Bar ( actually I've heard it is ), you would blame Hodgson. Wilf had an excellent season last year. Then he wanted to leave and was effectively prevented from doing so by Parish's valuation. This season, he has been way below par and at times didn't look interested. In fact you could argue that had Zaha upped his game, we may have got a few more points on the board.
Old, Ungifted and White |
|
|
Originally posted by NEILLO
You just can't help yourself, can you ? If the beer was flat in the Red and Blue Bar ( actually I've heard it is ), you would blame Hodgson. Wilf had an excellent season last year. Then he wanted to leave and was effectively prevented from doing so by Parish's valuation. This season, he has been way below par and at times didn't look interested. In fact you could argue that had Zaha upped his game, we may have got a few more points on the board.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Casual
Not true. If his name wasn’t Wilfred Zaha he would have been watching most of our games this season, rather than playing. And replace him with who?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I don’t agree we would have gone down without him this season. Should have been sold end of last year at full value and replaced with Sarr or Saint Maximin and we would have still had plenty of change. Now I don’t think anyone will pay more than £30-£40m for him and we will need every bit of that just to get the centre forward we require. I agree, only we only received Arsenal’s £45 mil was it offer spread over 7 transfer windows. If we were offered £60-65 mil I’d have accepted it. Otherwise I completely agree. But even then there’s Parish probably worried we’re losing AWB and Zaha down one side in one transfer window.
COYP |
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I don’t agree we would have gone down without him this season. Should have been sold end of last year at full value and replaced with Sarr or Saint Maximin and we would have still had plenty of change. Now I don’t think anyone will pay more than £30-£40m for him and we will need every bit of that just to get the centre forward we require. I honestly don’t think we would have replaced or even got these players over the line if we had sold Zaha. We have seen it in the past so many times, every transfer window.Reports that this player is going to sign that player is going to sign only to find out the the club how cooled their interest and are looking at other cheaper alternatives. Then right at the last minute it’s rush rush back to the past interested players squeezing in a rush job medical, personal details only to find we didn’t get the deal over the line, just to save a few pence it’s always the same story.
South London & Proud |
|
|
Originally posted by samprior
Seems to be the first summer where there's clear intentions from both sides to sell. Only problem is finding a buyer (who's willing to match our value- I imagine we've lowered that considerably since last season) after what was a pretty poor season for Wilf. As I've said before the best scenario imo is to find a club open to exchanges. Then we'll instantly fill needs and not be sitting on what I'd assume to be a well published transfer fee that other clubs would then hold us to ransom over knowing that we got 30m,40m,50m etc for Wilf. If Chelsea became interested I'd enquire a swap for Bats + C.Gallagher etc. We'll see what happens...I just hope it's sorted early but as always I expect it to drag on the whole window.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Lanzo-Ad
What price would we accept and what is the most anyone will pay, 25million? 45m or 25 and a decent player
|
|
|
Has he put in a new transfer request or does the old one still stand?
|
|
|
Who do you want slub?
|
|
|
Originally posted by pompeyeagle
The worry for me is if, as seems likely, Zaha is still with us next season, what sort of attitude will he have and will the manager, be it Hodgson or someone else, be brave enough to drop him. More than any other reason that is why he should go. He has had a whole season to get over himself he is not for turning it seems.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Eaglehamster
The assumption that money received from Wilf's sale will fund new player(s) is rather dodgy isn't it? Very.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.