The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 matt_himself  Matataland 25 Jun 16 6.35pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
2mill plus from more old people Your reply was what I expected. Jittery and avoiding the point and being obtuse, as usual. Edited by Kermit8 (25 Jun 2016 6.23pm) By being 'obtuse', you mean I am questioning your statistics? I am asking for proof of what you claim is true? Pathetic Michael. Well it would appear from your link, that immigration is key driver for that 70 million figure and one would assume that the Leave campaign is claiming that exiting the EU gives us more control over immigration, not the open door policy at present, and therefore if immigration can be curbed, there should be more houses. Now, when are you going to reply to my question to you earlier today regarding what was Remain's vision for Britain at this referendum following an in vote? One cannot help but think you don't know or couldn't find it because it doesn't exist and you don't want to say that. Failure to reply will be taken as 'I haven't a f***ing clue'.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 25 Jun 16 6.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by blackpalacefan
"Sky News has learnt that the billionaire tycoon Wilbur Ross, who is among seven bidders shortlisted for Tata Steel's UK business, has signalled that exiting the EU would diminish the prospects of him pursuing a takeover. A number of other prospective buyers are understood to have similar concerns about the potential impact of Brexit on global demand for steel, the robustness of new trade deals negotiated by the Government, and the ability to sell steel produced in the UK in the European single market. "Wilbur has been reasonably open that this deal is far less attractive if Brexit happens," said a person who has discussed the Tata Steel situation with Mr Ross. Sources said this weekend that Tata Steel, which employs roughly 11,000 people in the UK, had raised the possibility of putting its British business into some form of liquidation, although they added that no decisions had been taken." [Link] Looking for a better deal (price)? Merkel and Hollande would prefer to bring calm to markets than allow a downturn that would damage demand for QUALITY UK steel and not cheap junk. EU countries export to us, we to them. UK imports 20% of German cars. Germany and France hold General Elections next year. How do you reckon they'll play that one? Juncker's way? Or their way, protecting German and French industry and jobs?
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Kermit8  Hevon 25 Jun 16 6.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
By being 'obtuse', you mean I am questioning your statistics? I am asking for proof of what you claim is true? Pathetic Michael. Well it would appear from your link, that immigration is key driver for that 70 million figure and one would assume that the Leave campaign is claiming that exiting the EU gives us more control over immigration, not the open door policy at present, and therefore if immigration can be curbed, there should be more houses. Now, when are you going to reply to my question to you earlier today regarding what was Remain's vision for Britain at this referendum following an in vote? One cannot help but think you don't know or couldn't find it because it doesn't exist and you don't want to say that. Failure to reply will be taken as 'I haven't a f***ing clue'. We don't have an open door policy for non-eu migrants and our people are getting older. Quibble if you want. How can there be more houses for people if there are going to be an extra 4-5mill anyway EU or non-EU? You really are a like a dog chasing your tail on this one. I'd give up now if I were you. I did answer your 'Remain' point. You just chose not to see it.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 25 Jun 16 6.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Cucking Funt
Because she's an interviewer without substance. The £350m a week figure was shown to be inaccurate early in the campaign and Leave dropped it, tacitly admitting it to be so. So why harp on about it now? And for her to suggest that that claim influenced people's voting intentions is, frankly, an insult to the intelligence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 25 Jun 16 6.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Did you or did you not say that NO 2EU were a left wing organisation? You did. Therefore to say my sort were against leaving is contradicting yourself. Still waiting...
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| blackpalacefan 25 Jun 16 6.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Looking for a better deal (price)? Merkel and Hollande would prefer to bring calm to markets than allow a downturn that would damage demand for QUALITY UK steel and not cheap junk. EU countries export to us, we to them. UK imports 20% of German cars. Germany and France hold General Elections next year. How do you reckon they'll play that one? Juncker's way? Or their way, protecting German and French industry and jobs? Germany has to weigh up whether it's more damaging for them to give us ropey trade agreements to show what happens when you leave the EU, or to give us parity. That's a decision that's for them, we now have little say in it. With a trading block vs one country though we would feel the damage more than any of them individually. It's likely all academic though as 'leave' appears to be moving towards an EEA deal which will involve freedom of movement anyway. The vote was the leave the EU. Whatever they do after that is down to them and They're trying to freeze Farage out of talks. Hannan and co are starting to talk down ideas of a radical decline in immigration and talk up EEA. The people got played. As if they ever cared about the working classes. No party does.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 25 Jun 16 6.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Nick, on QT he said "He'd like to spend it on schools, NHS, hospitals, GP's." On ITV's morning sofa s***V he said he "couldn't guarantee it." He then said "it's free money THAT COULD BE spent on the schools, the NHS, whatever it is." What is the problem? Someone who will not be able to decide govt spending anyway, just highlight money saved and where it could be spent.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 25 Jun 16 6.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Kermit8
We don't have an open door policy for non-eu migrants and our people are getting older. Quibble if you want. How can there be more houses for people if there are going to be an extra 4-5mill anyway EU or non-EU? You really are a like a dog chasing your tail on this one. I'd give up now if I were you. I did answer your 'Remain' point. You just chose not to see it. Read back what you have written. It makes no sense. If we are out of the EU, there will be less EU immigrants, ergo, more housing for those already in the country. If we are in the EU, more EU immigrants will come to the country and, ergo, there will be less housing available. Please point me in the direction of your response on the vision for Britain given by Remain because I cannot find it.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 25 Jun 16 6.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Still waiting... Is that directed to me? If so, answered. Go back and look. Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (25 Jun 2016 6.58pm)
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 25 Jun 16 7.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Is that directed to me? If so, answered. Go back and look. Jog on Gusset. Edited by matt_himself (25 Jun 2016 6.58pm) Nope just concede that there were some of 'my sort' that were brexiters for socialist reasons. You didn't answer before, just parrots something about Corbyns politics being adolescent.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| blackpalacefan 25 Jun 16 7.10pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Read back what you have written. It makes no sense. If we are out of the EU, there will be less EU immigrants, ergo, more housing for those already in the country. If we are in the EU, more EU immigrants will come to the country and, ergo, there will be less housing available. Please point me in the direction of your response on the vision for Britain given by Remain because I cannot find it. What about if we join the EEA? Same freedom of movement requirements I believe. I'm interested in knowing what the plan is for lowing EU immigration post EU exit?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 25 Jun 16 7.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Nope just concede that there were some of 'my sort' that were brexiters for socialist reasons. You didn't answer before, just parrots something about Corbyns politics being adolescent. Hmm...reviving something I answered about 20 pages ago. Gusset is spoiling for fight everyone.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.