You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Should a general election be called.
April 24 2024 2.52am

Should a general election be called.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 6 of 9 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

 

jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jun 16 4.56pm

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

The press are the least of the problem.

Labour party members failing to recognise how out of touch they are is the problem. They are battling against the tide of political change. They want the labout party of the 70's in 2016 and Corbyn is putting his dinosaur ideologies and political ambition before his party and majority public opinion.

He is just another self serving politician after all.

Except of course, he was elected leader by a clear majority of those people eligible to vote. It doesn't matter if its dinosaur ideas - He was the chosen leader by the system in place. And of course on the subject of a referendum he was a lot closer than the Conservative Party leader was (around 35-40% of the Leave vote came from Labour voters).

Had he come out for an exit, the PLP would have been out for him with knives to the back. Despite the fact their last selection was a stirring failure.

Tom Watson, Hillary Benn, might as well say Tony Blair.. And lets face it, most of them probably voted remain and campaigned on a remain as well.

Whilst I don't necessarily agree that Corbyn should continue by default, its basically a coup by the parts of the labour party that are 'business as usual'.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 27 Jun 16 5.46pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Except of course, he was elected leader by a clear majority of those people eligible to vote. It doesn't matter if its dinosaur ideas - He was the chosen leader by the system in place. And of course on the subject of a referendum he was a lot closer than the Conservative Party leader was (around 35-40% of the Leave vote came from Labour voters).

Had he come out for an exit, the PLP would have been out for him with knives to the back. Despite the fact their last selection was a stirring failure.

Tom Watson, Hillary Benn, might as well say Tony Blair.. And lets face it, most of them probably voted remain and campaigned on a remain as well.

Whilst I don't necessarily agree that Corbyn should continue by default, its basically a coup by the parts of the labour party that are 'business as usual'.

It will in a general election.

In simple terms, Labour is lurching to the left while the country is moving to the right. Corbyn might well have good support among party members but that will not help him win an election. True, labour can appeal to the Remain camp but they have a lot of policy contradictions to deal with with with regard the main issues.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View the_mcanuff_stuff's Profile the_mcanuff_stuff Flag Caterham 28 Jun 16 9.35am Send a Private Message to the_mcanuff_stuff Add the_mcanuff_stuff as a friend

I think we will need one, to answer the "what will Brexit look like?" Question. The candidates can then put forth their views and the public decide their candidate based (in part at least) on that. The winner will then have a mandate to follow that post-Brexit route.

Either that, or a second referendum (no not a re-run of the in/out one, we have to respect that) which offers maybe 3 alternatives for the public to decide on. e.g. EEA membership (like Norway), a "Swiss" model, or other.

Arguably, this should have been done before the in/out decision. The UK looks pretty amateurish right now, sitting there with no post-Brexit plan.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 28 Jun 16 11.29am

Absolutely no way would I call a General Election if I was the new Tory leader.

I would take over as PM, and carry out the will of the people but appointing a cross party committee of MP's also containing Farage and someone like James Dyson and/or Sugar/Bryson.

Take command sort out the mess short term and wait for the EU to implode - which it surely will and then negotiate fair and lasting reciprocal trade deals with the ex EU nations who want to trade with us anyway but are stupidly toeing the EU line right now.

Lets hope the new PM (Boris or Fox for me please) see it as I do.

Oh and one final thing, tell Sturgeon and the SNP dissenters if they don't like Brexit they can have Independence for Scotland without the need for a 2nd referendum. Fcuk off now, here's some cash to help you set up ... don't come back crying in a few years time when it's all gone t1ts up though..... Bye.... X

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Deleted11 28 Jun 16 11.34am

I'm sure it's been said, but the whole hypocrisy of going out of the EU because it's undemocratic and then having an unelected leader would send a message that we are a shambles of a country.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 28 Jun 16 12.14pm

Originally posted by Jway89

I'm sure it's been said, but the whole hypocrisy of going out of the EU because it's undemocratic and then having an unelected leader would send a message that we are a shambles of a country.

You haven't got a long memory then?

Brown carried on as PM when Bliar retired without going to the polls.

Brown did send a message that we were a shambles of a country though - you were right about that.... the shambles was his policy making.... totally shambolic.... and ended in tears.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 28 Jun 16 12.18pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Jway89

I'm sure it's been said, but the whole hypocrisy of going out of the EU because it's undemocratic and then having an unelected leader would send a message that we are a shambles of a country.

Or undermining democracy and demanding another referendum over the exit from an undemocratic political union.

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised. Apparently the new way to debate amongst the young and in some uni debates is to shout down the other side or the minority.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View We are goin up!'s Profile We are goin up! Flag Coulsdon 28 Jun 16 12.30pm Send a Private Message to We are goin up! Add We are goin up! as a friend

Any new PM should be subject to an election IMO and each party should campaign on what type of Brexit they'd be looking for.

I take the opposite view to Cucking though. If any party (particularly Labour) say that an absolute necessity of their renegotiation is a control of some sort on immigration, then they would win the election unless everyone else said it, too. They would be extremely foolish to not promise this, because they would then make UKIP even stronger, they'd take all the old Labour areas from the North for a start and probably a lot of Essex, Cornwall and Kent.

 


The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Anerley-Fried-Eagle's Profile Anerley-Fried-Eagle Flag Fake Beckenham actually 28 Jun 16 12.36pm Send a Private Message to Anerley-Fried-Eagle Add Anerley-Fried-Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

Very Right-Wing Conservative landslide nailed on if they do. It'll be like the 80's again.

Fun times.

I've heard theres trouble brewing in the Falklands.

No, fast forward 30+ years and we have different opportunistic behaviour.

Nothing changes.

 


RIP ENGLISH FOOTBALL 24/6/14

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View OknotOK's Profile OknotOK Flag Cockfosters, London 28 Jun 16 2.08pm Send a Private Message to OknotOK Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add OknotOK as a friend

Originally posted by Hoof Hearted

You haven't got a long memory then?

Brown carried on as PM when Bliar retired without going to the polls.

Brown did send a message that we were a shambles of a country though - you were right about that.... the shambles was his policy making.... totally shambolic.... and ended in tears.

And plenty said he was being anti-democractic by doing exactly that. Even though it was exactly what Major had done before him as well (another shambles there).

 


"It's almost like a moral decision. Except not really cos noone is going to find out," Jez, Peep Show

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stuk's Profile Stuk Flag Top half 28 Jun 16 2.12pm Send a Private Message to Stuk Add Stuk as a friend

Originally posted by OknotOK

And plenty said he was being anti-democractic by doing exactly that. Even though it was exactly what Major had done before him as well (another shambles there).

Did they have leadership contest? No, maybe that's why people felt it was not democratic.

You don't vote for PM, party leader etc at a General election. You vote for your MP.

 


Optimistic as ever

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 28 Jun 16 2.20pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Anerley-Fried-Eagle

I've heard theres trouble brewing in the Falklands.

No, fast forward 30+ years and we have different opportunistic behaviour.

Nothing changes.

Don't forget to tell syd.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 6 of 9 < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Should a general election be called.