No I am referring to your lack of underlying consistent argument (other than not liking immigrants).The main area of "mass" immigration to the UK in recent years has been Poland...no potential threat to UK security whatsoever...

Well done. You have managed to cram unsupported subjective criticism, baseless accusation, a straw man argument and selective reasoning all into one short post.

And I'd worry more about your own argument. You singled out one country that no one mentioned other than you.

And well done you...you've managed to have 4 pops at me in one sentence and still not address my underlying point

Its always been a fairly porous border between France and Belgium - in fact most European countries are the same. The sheer size of the borders and the geography of Europe makes internal border controls prohibitively expensive. The UK has only a few points of access on the basis of being an island. In essence the freedom of movement across borders has largely been in place long before the EU. Its not really viable for mainland Europe in the most (although provision existed for police activity in criminality such as terrorism during the 70s and 80s).

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

To an extent, for the most part though counter-terrorism and UK Security tends to be MI-5 rather than MI-6. Logistically, its far better set up to deal with threats to the UK (and the commonwealth). MI-6 is most certainly involved in counter-terrorism but usually more in terms of intelligence gathering and operations in countries where MI-5 has no presence (such as Afghanistan and Syria) but threats in those countries to the UK from terrorism, would likely be co-ordinated or operated by the security service).

Although that has become increasingly blurred in more recent times (IS in Syria). SIS has increasingly become involved in counter-terrorism intelligence gathering.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Your point was erroneous.

Because one country has a large number emigrating to Britain who do not pose a significant risk, does not alter the fact that wider immigration poses a significant security risk.
You can't dismiss an issue by quoting one example that might favour your argument when 10 others don't,
especially when you accuse me of having no underlying reasoning.
Also, you have a tendency, like some other on here, to lace your posts with snide remarks making reference to racism and intolerance.
When discussing security, it makes you sound sympathetic to anti British causes.