You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC pay
April 24 2024 1.51am

BBC pay

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

 

View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 23 Jul 17 6.18pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I see a letter has been written and signed by female presenters complaining about their pay.....they want a pay rise.

BBC presenters and selected staff are paid far too much as it is. The BBC is paid for by the public. In an era of one percent in the public sector and pay cuts in others, rather than giving female presenters a pay rise perhaps they should be reducing male presenter's pay down.

Any thoughts.....Does market forces mean anything?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View YT's Profile YT Flag Oxford 23 Jul 17 6.32pm Send a Private Message to YT Add YT as a friend

Reduce male AND female to the same much lower level. The 'talent premium' argument is a pretty thin one in most cases. For example, barely a single presenter at the BBC can say "The Claret Jug" correctly. They all say it as though it's a jug that's coloured claret - not a jug to be used for claret. The intonation is different; try it. It just proves that the lot of 'em read stuff out but don't actually think about what they are saying.

 


Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View elgrande's Profile elgrande Flag bedford 23 Jul 17 6.35pm Send a Private Message to elgrande Add elgrande as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I see a letter has been written and signed by female presenters complaining about their pay.....they want a pay rise.

BBC presenters and selected staff are paid far too much as it is. The BBC is paid for by the public. In an era of one percent in the public sector and pay cuts in others, rather than giving female presenters a pay rise perhaps they should be reducing male presenter's pay down.

Any thoughts.....Does market forces mean anything?

I would have equality (but only after they have finished all the cleaning.)......please I am only joking so usual suspects don't bite.

 


always a Norwood boy, where ever I live.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 23 Jul 17 7.01pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by YT

Reduce male AND female to the same much lower level. The 'talent premium' argument is a pretty thin one in most cases. For example, barely a single presenter at the BBC can say "The Claret Jug" correctly. They all say it as though it's a jug that's coloured claret - not a jug to be used for claret. The intonation is different; try it. It just proves that the lot of 'em read stuff out but don't actually think about what they are saying.

I have some sympathy for this view insomuch as I'm simply amazed that a public sector body thinks it can defend pay levels that attempt to compete with the private sector.

Should the BBC really be making the 'market forces' argument? I find its entertainment sector an incredibly disappointing and expensive mess.....Only one female presenter I can be bothered with....Jo Coburn.

I can count on one hand the number of presenters that I think deserve to be called talented where a genuine loss would occur.....I mean it's obvious that Chris Evans is talented but over two frigging million talented??

That's not really what the BBC should be about....I think it's an excuse for giving themselves a very nice living instead of being treated like other publicly funded bodies.....well the ones that are suffering anyway.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jul 2017 7.03pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 23 Jul 17 7.03pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by elgrande

I would have equality (but only after they have finished all the cleaning.)......please I am only joking so usual suspects don't bite.

Nothing wrong with a great joke mate.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 23 Jul 17 7.12pm

Now the potential actors for doctor Who has doubled surely the pay should be halved.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 23 Jul 17 7.14pm

Originally posted by YT

Reduce male AND female to the same much lower level. The 'talent premium' argument is a pretty thin one in most cases. For example, barely a single presenter at the BBC can say "The Claret Jug" correctly. They all say it as though it's a jug that's coloured claret - not a jug to be used for claret. The intonation is different; try it. It just proves that the lot of 'em read stuff out but don't actually think about what they are saying.

Double the pay of anyone who uses an adverb rather than an adjective, I've noticed it spreading for Glen Hoddle in the 80s to the rest of the world.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View mezzer's Profile mezzer Flag Main Stand, Block F, Row 20 seat 1... 23 Jul 17 7.26pm Send a Private Message to mezzer Add mezzer as a friend

The BBC have started their cost cutting by making Dr Who female

 


Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 23 Jul 17 7.28pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by pefwin

Now the potential actors for doctor Who has doubled surely the pay should be halved.

It's interesting that the BBC gets to decide upon its own pay.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 23 Jul 17 7.40pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

I see a letter has been written and signed by female presenters complaining about their pay.....they want a pay rise.

BBC presenters and selected staff are paid far too much as it is. The BBC is paid for by the public. In an era of one percent in the public sector and pay cuts in others, rather than giving female presenters a pay rise perhaps they should be reducing male presenter's pay down.

Any thoughts.....Does market forces mean anything?

Everyone is paid for by the public (audience). No audience=no job. Same as football players. It's the market price that controls their pay.

I don't condone their pay, in fact I find it obscene, but that is what they can earn. I'd be far happier if nurses, doctors, police, firefighters, &etc, got a share of the celebrity wealth, but that is just dreaming. They have no commercial appeal. They merely save lives.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 23 Jul 17 7.43pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Everyone is paid for by the public (audience). No audience=no job. Same as football players. It's the market price that controls their pay.

I don't condone their pay, in fact I find it obscene, but that is what they can earn. I'd be far happier if nurses, doctors, police, firefighters, &etc, got a share of the celebrity wealth, but that is just dreaming. They have no commercial appeal. They merely save lives.

Valid criticisms I'd say.

Commercialism versus value of contribution to society.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 23 Jul 17 7.46pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Valid criticisms I'd say.

Commercialism versus value of contribution to society.

Makes ya sick though, no?

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 > Last >>

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC pay