Niasse Dive
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 eagle@ tn34  hastings 23 Nov 17 9.40pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Its time you got in that car willo and dont get lost, err I mean do. Boring hearing the same record from you over and over. COYP
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
chateauferret  23 Nov 17 9.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I see that the ref in their Atalanta game has taken 75 minutes and half a dozen nasty fouls to give Tom Davis a yellow. Horrible agricultural thug.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 23 Nov 17 9.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Thumped 5 - 1. In other news, Niasse whining about Koeman "trying to destroy" him. Never mind Koeman. Let Luka Milivojevic have a go. Edited by chateauferret (23 Nov 2017 10.03pm)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Eaglesnut  Waterford 23 Nov 17 10.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Banning a player for 2 games retrospectively does not help the club 'conned' in fact, as in our case, it could work against them as Everton's top scorer is now ruled out against other struggling teams. The offending team should have points deducted - again this may not be of any benefit to the offended team but should result in coaches ensuring their players refrain from diving. Any second or subsequent offence in the same season would see the points deducted increased. Teams have points deducted if they go into administration which is no fault of the players so why should the club not suffer if a player offends.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 24 Nov 17 9.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Ayew just dived at the Taxpayers' Stadium and Atkinson failed to book him. Didn't give a pen (correctly) but didn't book him either (incorrectly). Because no penalty, the panel won't be looking at it. Ayew only came on after 75 minutes and that and his fouls should have been enough to get him a red card. The whole thing is a lottery. Edited by chateauferret (24 Nov 2017 9.51pm)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 24 Nov 17 10.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Penalties are given far too easily these days. In the past you had to practically get your leg broken to get one. Not saying we should go back to that, but I think you have to give the benefit of any doubt to the defender.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Brentmiester_General Front line in the battle against t... 25 Nov 17 12.42am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Penalties are given far too easily these days. In the past you had to practically get your leg broken to get one. Not saying we should go back to that, but I think you have to give the benefit of any doubt to the defender. I agree. I often look at penalties given and wonder if it would have even warranted a free kick if it was outside the box. Having said that, a free kick is given now days for absolutely naff all.
"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Nobbybm Dartford 25 Nov 17 8.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
Ayew just dived at the Taxpayers' Stadium and Atkinson failed to book him. Didn't give a pen (correctly) but didn't book him either (incorrectly). Because no penalty, the panel won't be looking at it. Ayew only came on after 75 minutes and that and his fouls should have been enough to get him a red card. The whole thing is a lottery. Edited by chateauferret (24 Nov 2017 9.51pm) Funnily enough, I thought the same thing & the two West Ham I was watching with actually agreed. I’ve said before, unless the retrospective punishment is something like a point deducted from the offenders team & possibly one given to the ‘victim’ then they’ll not stop players doing it. There’s too much money involved in the EPL & the simple act of banning a player is weighted against smaller clubs - if, say, Citeh lost Aguero for a couple of games they’re not exactly short of talent to step in.
Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ARGILE OLD GEEZER  PORTIMAO 25 Nov 17 9.58am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
Referees get 98% of decisions right which of course is a high percentage. Of course on occasions the the 'Big' decisions can be called into question but I can understand the reasons from a referee's perspective. When players seek to deceive the referee in the penalty area (And outside) perhaps the focus of ire should be trained on them.It almost seems as though simulation is part of their daily training !!!! Why not review every penalty and rad card decision, regardless if it is in dispute or not? it only takes a minute and sort of adds to the excitement/anticipation.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Goal Machine  The Cronx 26 Nov 17 9.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
His ban is zero consolation for Palace but it is at least a step in the right direction. I sympathise with referees as it’s not easy to call these decisions when they happen at a blink of the eye, and that’s why they need help with technology. Personally, I’d like there to be a review system where the captain can challenge the decision. The footage can be reviewed in a matter of seconds when the ball next goes out of play. I think the standard of refereeing has dropped in recent years and the diving culture doesn’t help
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Aolcpfc Finchley, London 26 Nov 17 10.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Apologies in advance for the long post, but I think the detail is needed to make the argument stick that CPFC should demand three points for the game and not be satisfied with one point for a draw. Niasse dived. That is the verdict. Conclusion We should be awarded the three points for winning. It should be declared Everton's loss because they cheated. In the Olympics a goal medal is taken from the cheat. The original silver medal winner is awarded the gold; the bronze medal winner, the silver and the fourth-placed competitor the bronze. Practically everyone is satisfied except the cheat and those who condone cheating. Everton should have no argument that had they not been awarded the penalty the game might have been different because they would have scored another goal anyway because they would have been so resolute in getting back into the game. This counterfactual argument assumes far too much. The point is: Niasse cheats; Everton lose that particular (penalty) goal. Had the scoreline been CPFC 2 Everton 5 then a one goal deduction would have been CPFC 2 Everton 4, and Everton would have kept the 3 points despite the deducted goal (that resulted from the penalty). Had the penalty been saved then in the scenario above the scoreline would read CPFC 2 Everton 4 because no goal would have to be deducted because a goal had not resulted from the penalty. In the latter scenario, it could then be said that Everton won despite the instance of the wrongly awarded penalty. Sorry to be so pedantic, but I think that it spells out the detail of the argument that CPFC should make. It could be the difference between relegation and a place in the Premiership next year. Furthermore, the benefit of punishing the Everton team (as a whole) could be that in future they as a group of players would discourage Niasse from diving. As it stands, "he took one for the team" and the Everton team has profited. In general, the FA might see this as a better way of reducing the benefits of diving than simply punishing the one player.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
educt the goal as the penalty was wrongly awarded.| Dangermouse Hastings 26 Nov 17 10.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Retrospective bans are to try to change the mindset of players not the result. Goals change matches, so no one knows what might have happened if the ref got it right. Ayew should be charged by the FA regardless of if he fooled the official or not, if they want the new ruling to work.
That's Life |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.