The same thing can be levelled at you!

Do you know anything about Keith Ellison? He's a Democrat and I happen to believe he is innocent until proven guilty.

Easy to get a liar to stand up and talk sh*te if you pay her enough.

Bit of a different case though isn't it.

Here we have a live witness in front of a huge bench of old geezers on the telly being watched by multi-millions.

And even then nobody on the HOL is able to spell the name of the guy that she says assaulted her.

On the other hand you have a witness that claims to have video evidence of abuse that she isn't releasing.

In any case, I have no axe to grind save that if someone can't be trusted they shouldn't be one of the most important people on the planet. Does that make me unreasonable?

Pulling up spelling mistakes is the cheapest point scoring you can do.

If Kavanaugh did the crime, then he shouldn't serve on the supreme court.

However all four witnesses who were there have no recollection of the assault on the penalty of perjury.

Can't be trusted? His private and professional life has been exemplary. He's had multiple FBI background checks over the years.

The Dems want to delay his appointment – as they held on to the claims for 60 days and desperately want an FBI investigation – then probably win the house and stop his appointment. It's a nasty trick to play and smears the man's character and his career.

Edited by Penge Eagle (27 Sep 2018 11.39pm)

She voluntarily took the polygraph test, usually people come to a certain conclusion when people take the test voluntarily, come to a certain conclusion!