You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Daily Mail Reliability
July 18 2019 6.18pm

Daily Mail Reliability

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

 

pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 23 Jan 19 6.08pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

Explain your doubts.

ROFL next funty of all people will be asking for a source.

BTW.... Newsguard is funded by Trump.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
steve1984 23 Jan 19 6.14pm

My doubts are based on the belief that the BBC is guilty of nothing more heinous than ploughing a centrist liberal agenda in a world that is becoming increasingly polarised.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag The toppermost of the poppermost 23 Jan 19 6.21pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by steve1984

My doubts are based on the belief that the BBC is guilty of nothing more heinous than ploughing a centrist liberal agenda in a world that is becoming increasingly polarised.

For a supposedly neutral reporter of news, adoption of any position, centrist or other, affects its reliability.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Cucking Funt's Profile Cucking Funt Flag The toppermost of the poppermost 23 Jan 19 6.24pm Send a Private Message to Cucking Funt Add Cucking Funt as a friend

Originally posted by pefwin

ROFL next funty of all people will be asking for a source.

BTW.... Newsguard is funded by Trump.

"Of all people"? What fresh mincing is this?

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steve1984 23 Jan 19 6.27pm

Originally posted by Cucking Funt

For a supposedly neutral reporter of news, adoption of any position, centrist or other, affects its reliability.

I guess I just meant middle ground, neutral, etc. It seems to be so busy not trying to offend anyone that it pisses almost everyone off.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mapletree's Profile Mapletree Flag Croydon 23 Jan 19 6.32pm Send a Private Message to Mapletree Add Mapletree as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

It would be more accurate to blame the Mail itself which is the biggest spreader of false stories around today, with the exception of Fox News.

I know a journalist who used to work for the Mail. He has told me a thing or two about how they are instructed to present things.

Come now Wisbech. You have been living in Cebu too long. Failing to spot classic South London irony.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 23 Jan 19 6.36pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by pefwin

ROFL next funty of all people will be asking for a source.

BTW.... Newsguard is funded by Trump.

My god man, anyone who watches any of the major news networks and can't see the bias in almost every story must be blind or deliberately obtuse.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Online Flag Wisbech, England 23 Jan 19 6.39pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by steve1984

My doubts are based on the belief that the BBC is guilty of nothing more heinous than ploughing a centrist liberal agenda in a world that is becoming increasingly polarised.

The BBC website isn't centrist by any stretch of the imagination.....It's full on 'progressive'.

The social justice adoption of racial and other minority targets isn't 'centrist' either......What is exactly in the centre about that? How does that differ from 'progressive' politics?

No, I think calling the BBC centrist is more of the reality of twenty years ago not today.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2019 6.41pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 23 Jan 19 6.44pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The BBC website isn't centrist by any stretch of the imagination.....It's full on 'progressive'.

The social justice adoption of racial and other minority targets isn't 'centrist' either......What is exactly in the centre about that? How does that differ from 'progressive' politics?

No, I think calling the BBC centrist is more of the reality of twenty years ago not today.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2019 6.41pm)

This is absolutely right.
Centrist suggests a large degree neutrality and that is clearly not the case.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
steve1984 23 Jan 19 7.28pm

Perhaps you're both right. I find it just as nauseating as the bloody Grauniad.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View W12's Profile W12 Flag 23 Jan 19 7.57pm Send a Private Message to W12 Add W12 as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

This is absolutely right.
Centrist suggests a large degree neutrality and that is clearly not the case.

And now venturing into anti male and anti white propaganda which is where this is all inevitably leading.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 23 Jan 19 7.59pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

My god man, anyone who watches any of the major news networks and can't see the bias in almost every story must be blind or deliberately obtuse.

Bias depends on your own viewpoint. Those as far to the right as you get a very distorted view of anything that's in the centre, because it's all to your left. Only those with a view in the centre can see both sides.

Doubtless you think the Mail and Fox tell the truth because they hold opinions that match your own. You could always surprise me though and tell me that you think they are biased.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 2 of 3 < 1 2 3 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Daily Mail Reliability