Covid vaccine
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Eaglecoops  CR3 01 Feb 21 9.31pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by m/k mick
Here’s a thought, we now have the British, South African, and Brazil variants, but when Trump called it the China Virus, people complained that it did not help, China must be loving this re marketing of the virus, a few more variants from around the world, and people will forget who to blame It may say Brazil, British and South African on the front, but if you turn them all over it will say, “Made in China”.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 01 Feb 21 10.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
My question was aimed at WE not at you, apologies I am puzzled. What question do you think I haven't answered? AS I hadn't read every post I just trawled back but cannot understand what's missing.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 02 Feb 21 8.08am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No, we shouldn't vaccinate all our own first if it isn't actually in their best interests to do so. That's why it's complicated and we need to listen to the experts. I am not an expert but I am prepared to admit they know more than me. Are you? The EU have got themselves embroiled in a very silly public row which does no-one any favours. Emotions have spilled over and hopefully everyone will now dampen them down and work together in our mutual interests. Let me help. I asked for clarification as to who are the people you referred to in your first sentence? Edited by Spiderman (02 Feb 2021 8.11am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 02 Feb 21 9.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Scotland struggling to vaccinate people. i know that Nicola loves the EU and wants Scotland to mirror them but does she have to copy their vaccine roll out program as well?
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 02 Feb 21 12.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Great news Selhurst Park is now one of the biggest vaccination centres in London
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  02 Feb 21 1.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Scotland struggling to vaccinate people. i know that Nicola loves the EU and wants Scotland to mirror them but does she have to copy their vaccine roll out program as well? According to the Omni calculator I should get my second jab by 27 September. Not brilliant considering Scotland have 10% of the population of England.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 02 Feb 21 1.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Great news Selhurst Park is now one of the biggest vaccination centres in London Good publicity for us.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 02 Feb 21 2.09pm |
|
|---|---|
|
So the eu are reporting our vaccination program as dangerous because we rushed the approval. The very same vaccine that they approved on friday.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 02 Feb 21 2.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Let me help. I asked for clarification as to who are the people you referred to in your first sentence? Edited by Spiderman (02 Feb 2021 8.11am) Do you mean this:- "We need to take decisions which have the greatest impact on reducing the overall spread of the pandemic"? If so I mean everyone, ourselves included, because this is a global issue for which a global response is going to ultimately pay the highest dividends. I am not competent to judge what the best approach might be but am prepared to accept that there are people who are. So avoiding short term, knee jerk national responses as a consequence of local political pressures will be a big problem for governments around the world. If it is known that such an approach is actually not in anyone's best interests then convincing people will be both necessary and difficult.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 02 Feb 21 2.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
So the eu are reporting our vaccination program as dangerous because we rushed the approval. The very same vaccine that they approved on friday. EU announces formation of an EU army by all 27 members, Scotland expected to join. The Plan: - The Germans will provide organisation - The Italians will design and provide the uniforms - The French will provide the catering and "love" hotels for the men. - The Irish and the Scots will provide the fighting men. The reality: - The Italians will provide the organisation. - The Scots will provide the catering (Haggis) - The Germans will provide the humour and PR - The French will manage the finances as bribery is their speciality. - The Swedes will provide the gender equal fighting men and women. - The Irish will just be ignored.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 02 Feb 21 2.59pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Back to the drawing board then.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 02 Feb 21 3.04pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Do you mean this:- "We need to take decisions which have the greatest impact on reducing the overall spread of the pandemic"? If so I mean everyone, ourselves included, because this is a global issue for which a global response is going to ultimately pay the highest dividends. I am not competent to judge what the best approach might be but am prepared to accept that there are people who are. So avoiding short term, knee jerk national responses as a consequence of local political pressures will be a big problem for governments around the world. If it is known that such an approach is actually not in anyone's best interests then convincing people will be both necessary and difficult. Can’t see that question in the post. I obviously meant you to clarify your statement “ we shouldn’t vaccinate all of our own first if it isn’t actually in their best interests”. Whose interests would not be best served by being vaccinated ? Just would like clarification of your statement
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.