Back when I was younger and had more mental energy after work I would occasionally do deep dives into various conspiracies to decide for myself whether I believed them or not.....Some I found held water, most didn't....Obviously I looked into 9/11.

9/11 is probably the single event that has the most theories, varying from energy weapons and holographic and abducted planes to thermite blown buildings.

My conclusion after looking into it was that the official narrative is true except for pre knowledge of foreign intelligence agencies and domestic intelligence failures....they tried to memory hole information on foreign agencies and only partly acknowledged their domestic intelligence failures.....which fore-shadowed their later internal changes.

The explanation for building 7 is ably explained by Myles Powers in this video.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Aug 2021 1.06am)

Biden's first week in office saw him cancel the US pipeline, which would have given them energy independence.

A year later with prices rising significantly along with inflation generally, in part due to frankly irrational policies.......he begs the middle east to pump more oil to increase supply.

At what point does incompetence become a kind of evil? In so much as those who can't escape stupid policies are unable to escape their affects.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Aug 2021 2.28pm)

In the article the claim is made that, 'no steel and concrete building has ever been completely levelled to the ground, (collapsed) by a minor fire, in the history of steel and concrete buildings. Neither before September 11, 2001 or since then.'.

Now back in the day when I was looking in 9/11 I checked this out and it's quite misleading. Firstly there have been many collapses both partial and some what could be described as effectively fully from the effects of fire.

That's the problem with a lot of 9/11 claims, they are half truths that don't stand up once you look into it with an open mind.

A full collapse example from fire can include the Plasco building and probably the most famous partial collapse is the Windsor tower collapse.

[Link]
[Link]

Many of the buildings that were partial would have eventually been full if they hadn't been worked on by fire brigades.

Also, the size of the building matters due to stress on weakening steel that is just left. The nature of 9/11 meant that these buildings were just left to burn.

Steel weakens significantly at half the temperature required to melt it......if it's being tasked with holding up god knows how many thousands of tons like the towers and wtc 7 then it just makes sense that it's going to eventually fail unless the temperature is kept within limits.

Much of the strutural evidence is covered by Powers in his video.

A lot of the conspiracy issues can be answered by what happened that day. I hear a lot of 'this has never happened before' when the reality is planes that size and fires that extensive never happened to buildings constructed like that before.......The WTC towers just weren't made to survive what happened to them.....the new buildings are.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Aug 2021 4.46pm)

In the article the claim is made that, 'no steel and concrete building has ever been completely levelled to the ground, (collapsed) by a minor fire, in the history of steel and concrete buildings. Neither before September 11, 2001 or since then.'.

Now back in the day when I was looking in 9/11 I checked this out and it's quite misleading. Firstly there have been many collapses both partial and some what could be described as effectively fully from the effects of fire.

That's the problem with a lot of 9/11 claims, they are half truths that don't stand up once you look into it with an open mind.

A full collapse example from fire can include the Plasco building and probably the most famous partial collapse is the Windsor tower collapse.

[Link]
[Link]

Many of the buildings that were partial would have eventually been full if they hadn't been worked on by fire brigades.

Also, the size of the building matters due to stress on weakening steel that is just left. The nature of 9/11 meant that these buildings were just left to burn.

Steel weakens significantly at half the temperature required to melt it......if it's being tasked with holding up god knows how many thousands of tons like the towers and wtc 7 then it just makes sense that it's going to eventually fail unless the temperature is kept within limits.

Much of the strutural evidence is covered by Powers in his video.

A lot of the conspiracy issues can be answered by what happened that day. I hear a lot of 'this has never happened before' when the reality is planes that size and fires that extensive never happened to buildings constructed like that before.......The WTC towers just weren't made to survive what happened to them.....the new buildings are.

Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Aug 2021 4.46pm)