You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic
September 22 2021 12.03am

They kept that quiet. (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

This forum is sponsored by

Football Index

Sponsor a forum or Advertise on the HOL!

Topic Locked

View Henry of Peckham's Profile Henry of Peckham Flag Eton Mess 01 Sep 21 11.13pm Send a Private Message to Henry of Peckham Add Henry of Peckham as a friend

Originally posted by braunstoneagle

you know what…if somebody has been offered both jabs and wont have them (apart from medical reasons) then f*** ‘em they shouldnt be allowed into a confined enviroment like a football stadium.

seems perfectly fair to me

Seems perfectly fair to me too!

 


Denial is not just a river in Egypt

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View TheBigToePunt's Profile TheBigToePunt Flag 01 Sep 21 11.29pm Send a Private Message to TheBigToePunt Add TheBigToePunt as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Everyone is still ‘at risk’ or not ‘staying safe’ even with these vaccines. If you want to ‘stay safe’ and keep your loved ones safe then unless you wear an FFP3 mask I’m afraid you won’t be. But what you might do is put blame on others when you could get an FFP3 mask and know none of the other stuff matters to you and your loved ones. But let’s use it as a 21st century way to claim moral superiority while the opportunity is there rather than do something that is going to be certain of a result.

Rudi, do you have any data on how much better those masks are? I must confess I wasn't aware they offered so much more than other preventative steps.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 01 Sep 21 11.44pm Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

Rudi, do you have any data on how much better those masks are? I must confess I wasn't aware they offered so much more than other preventative steps.

95-97% protection for the wearer. Cloth masks anything from zero to 20% possibly. But that’s for other, allegedly. A one way mask you’re still at close to highest risk from infection. Hmmm.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 01 Sep 21 11.57pm Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

Everyone is still ‘at risk’ or not ‘staying safe’ even with these vaccines. If you want to ‘stay safe’ and keep your loved ones safe then unless you wear an FFP3 mask I’m afraid you won’t be. But what you might do is put blame on others when you could get an FFP3 mask and know none of the other stuff matters to you and your loved ones. But let’s use it as a 21st century way to claim moral superiority while the opportunity is there rather than do something that is going to be certain of a result.

Rudi, FFP masks are for dust. Even FFP3 will not stop a microbe. I'm not saying they are useless, but to eliminate the potential of contracting a virus, you need to do more than wear a FFP3 mask. A particle of dust that is filtered by these masks is at least 100 times larger than any germs known. It's like trying to stop water with a sieve. Masks are a crutch that helps people feel safe.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Rudi Hedman's Profile Rudi Hedman Flag Caterham 02 Sep 21 12.12am Send a Private Message to Rudi Hedman Add Rudi Hedman as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Rudi, FFP masks are for dust. Even FFP3 will not stop a microbe. I'm not saying they are useless, but to eliminate the potential of contracting a virus, you need to do more than wear a FFP3 mask. A particle of dust that is filtered by these masks is at least 100 times larger than any germs known. It's like trying to stop water with a sieve. Masks are a crutch that helps people feel safe.

NHS staff have been wearing them in Covid ICU for 18 months.

 


COYP

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Tickled pink's Profile Tickled pink Flag Cornwall 02 Sep 21 12.19am Send a Private Message to Tickled pink Add Tickled pink as a friend

Originally posted by TheBigToePunt

That's deeply unconvincing to be honest. It's a partial vaccine that you take to protect you and, crucially (though you seem to miss the point) others.

I think all we fully know and understand about this virus to date is that by having the vaccine an individuals chances of becoming extremely ill is significantly reduced, information about the spreading load of both the vaccinated and unvaccinated is still inconclusive due to the shortness of time.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Tim Gypsy Hill '64's Profile Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Flag Stoke sub normal 02 Sep 21 12.19am Send a Private Message to Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Add Tim Gypsy Hill '64 as a friend

Originally posted by Rudi Hedman

NHS staff have been wearing them in Covid ICU for 18 months.

Cool. Nice profit for the manufacturer.

Like I said, it's a crutch for those who feel at risk. Research virus and microbe protection. You need to have a full biohazard suit, with personal respirator to eliminate risk of infection from microscopic organisms.

 


Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View BlueJay's Profile BlueJay Flag UK 02 Sep 21 5.47am Send a Private Message to BlueJay Add BlueJay as a friend

Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64

Cool. Nice profit for the manufacturer.

Like I said, it's a crutch for those who feel at risk. Research virus and microbe protection. You need to have a full biohazard suit, with personal respirator to eliminate risk of infection from microscopic organisms.

FFP3 masks are not only 'for dust' and claiming that NHS staff only wear them for 'profit for manufacturers' is an unfounded and irrational conspiracy theory. By your publicly stated views vaccines are 'unsafe' (including the one you yourself had) and FFP3 masks a a 'crutch' that makes little difference. Nobody said they eliminate risk, but there's certain more than enough out that to indicate that they significantly reduce it.

Wearing masks incorrectly can of course be a problem (though a perfectly avoidable one), though case in point there are multiple FFP3 'respirator' studies eliminating that issue which demonstrate a near if not 100% protection even in actual covid wards. A rather unusual level of success for something that apparently does very little.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View BlueJay's Profile BlueJay Flag UK 02 Sep 21 5.53am Send a Private Message to BlueJay Add BlueJay as a friend

Originally posted by rikz

Tho it's not a vaccine is it, scientists have already said it'll be impossible to achieve herd immunity due to the speed it mutates, it'll be a seasonal jab like the flu, it's not going anywhere, it's here to stay, if you're old or high risk and you don't get the jab then that's stupidity. I have a polio vaccine, I couldn't care less who else has it as I'm safe. Its been sensationalised by the press and has been politicised by governments. If it was as deadly as people make out you wouldn't have to bribe people to get it.

Tbh I do think enough time has passed now that anyone who wants to get vaccinated has been, so there is something to be said for people making up their own minds. That said, your statement in bold is odd. There is such a thing as community, and not only thinking about yourself. Obviously covid is a different animal, but surely polio was only all but wiped out due to uptake being so wide. Not just looking out for number one.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View topcat's Profile topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 02 Sep 21 7.57am Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

Anyway, back to the OP. This is a requirement from the Premier League, in advance of government legislation coming in at the end of September (announced back in July).

The one I can't understand is the (ELP) insistence on season tickets being on your phone rather than an physical ticket. Is this to do away with people sharing season tickets?

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 02 Sep 21 8.19am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by topcat

Anyway, back to the OP. This is a requirement from the Premier League, in advance of government legislation coming in at the end of September (announced back in July).

The one I can't understand is the (ELP) insistence on season tickets being on your phone rather than an physical ticket. Is this to do away with people sharing season tickets?

I have some sympathy with the clubs over sharing. I have no problem with somebody lending their ticket to a friend if they can't make the game we've all done it.

However if you take that to the extreme touts will be buying up scores of season tickets and then selling individual games whilst real fans would not be able to get a ticket.

Not an easy one to regulate.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
View MrRobbo's Profile MrRobbo Flag Purley 02 Sep 21 9.48am Send a Private Message to MrRobbo Add MrRobbo as a friend

I suspect, like everything it will have something to do with money.

I'd assume then season tickets all have to go through the official resell. Which would be a right pain, for anyone who shares season tickets....sure there will be a work around

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 3 of 12 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Topic