And what will our chum Phil's barber say when he does it again and again and it keeps going in? This is like the reverse sweep in cricket ... unthinkable, no one ever tried it, the odd one goes horribly wrong but it's now accepted without comment.

He meant it?! He mis kicked it with his left foot onto his right and that’s why it ballooned up like it did.
He has got stupendous skills though so if he does it again in another game then I may concede that he may have meant it!

I've looked at it dozens of times and I cannot, for the life of me, see any contact with his standing leg: it looks a truely hit, viciously spinning, shot. Try as I might, I see no contact whatsoever with his right leg.

Imo it was genius and we'll see it again.

Love the comments here [Link] to be fair it was about the fifth time I watched to work out what happened I thought it hit the hoarding behind
If he means that we have a truly great player on our hands. Pickfords positioning is fine and the only way he beaten is if there is pace and left to right movement with a small amount of dip, so if Olise means the amount of dip and height he gets on that goalkeepers are going to need to rethink their positioning against him.I hope it is not a fluke but I don't think we will see it again any time soon.It doesn't look like it hit his standing foot.

One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

Slimey toad is on to something. If he's a leg spinner it must have hit him in the googlies. That explains it.

So you can't mis-hit the ball twice in the same game?

His standing leg is in the same position because that's how you kick a football ffs - where else is it going to be?