Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 eaglesdare  10 May 23 9.09pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
I remember when sleepy Joe and many other so called top doctors / scientist said..."If you have the vaccine you will not get covid" Edited by eaglesdare (10 May 2023 9.15pm)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 May 23 9.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Carnegie Mellon is ranked #28 in the TES world university rankings for the year. Why do you think I do? I am undecided, especially as its meaning is not really clear and varies around the world. Many places require that you have been living as the sex you wish to identify for at least 2 years. It's more to avoid a physical determination than anything else. The two processes are entirely different anyway. One just involves answering an anonymous (probably) question on a form whilst the other is much more likely to be the end of a long process.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  10 May 23 9.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Why do you think I do? I am undecided, especially as its meaning is not really clear and varies around the world. Many places require that you have been living as the sex you wish to identify for at least 2 years. It's more to avoid a physical determination than anything else. The two processes are entirely different anyway. One just involves answering an anonymous (probably) question on a form whilst the other is much more likely to be the end of a long process. So the respondents at one of the leading universities in America are lying on a form? OK.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 May 23 11.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So the respondents at one of the leading universities in America are lying on a form? OK. I think you have misunderstood what happened. This was an online survey of US adults by the Universities. Not at the Universities.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 10 May 23 11.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I think you have misunderstood what happened. This was an online survey of US adults by the Universities. Not at the Universities. Yes but the percentage of respondents saying they were educated to PhD level is the same as the American average.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 11 May 23 12.44am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Until today I had not heard of Carnegie Mellon University, but today it features twice in this thread. It was responsible, together with Pittsburgh, for this study and it was where Dr Dan Wilson attained his Phd. Co-incidence? Probably but it raised my eyebrows. Now hang on there. I mentioned this as an aside, because I'd heard about it over a year back. and you decided to cast doubt on it as whether it was true. Now I have zero issues with you checking it out, in fact that's positive. However, once proof was shown to you we get this typical undermining routine which quite frankly just looks like an agenda, not someone actually interested in the truth of a matter. As for suggesting that you have never heard of Carnegie.....at your age? Really? Ok then, but most educated person from your era would at least know who he was let alone know he funded lots of institutions.....but ok. Anyway I find the idea that this university had an agenda or didn't do its work professionally pretty unlikely considering its level but whatever. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 May 2023 12.45am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 May 23 8.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Now hang on there. I mentioned this as an aside, because I'd heard about it over a year back. and you decided to cast doubt on it as whether it was true. Now I have zero issues with you checking it out, in fact that's positive. However, once proof was shown to you we get this typical undermining routine which quite frankly just looks like an agenda, not someone actually interested in the truth of a matter. As for suggesting that you have never heard of Carnegie.....at your age? Really? Ok then, but most educated person from your era would at least know who he was let alone know he funded lots of institutions.....but ok. Anyway I find the idea that this university had an agenda or didn't do its work professionally pretty unlikely considering its level but whatever. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 May 2023 12.45am) I didn't say I hadn't heard of Carnegie! I hadn't heard of the University! I make no accusations. I am observing. If you conduct an online survey then you are necessarily limited in your ability to double-check every response for accuracy. The bigger the survey, the bigger the problem. That's true for everyone, not this particular University group. You are depending on people's honesty and the purity of their motivations. So the results are broad brush and throw-up questions, rather than answers. Worthy of further investigation but not providing any kind of reliable evidence. I used what happened with "The Great Barrington Declaration" to illustrate the point. Drawing conclusions from unchecked data means there is a big risk that the conclusions are flawed.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 11 May 23 9.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Now hang on there. I mentioned this as an aside, because I'd heard about it over a year back. and you decided to cast doubt on it as whether it was true. Now I have zero issues with you checking it out, in fact that's positive. However, once proof was shown to you we get this typical undermining routine which quite frankly just looks like an agenda, not someone actually interested in the truth of a matter. As for suggesting that you have never heard of Carnegie.....at your age? Really? Ok then, but most educated person from your era would at least know who he was let alone know he funded lots of institutions.....but ok. Anyway I find the idea that this university had an agenda or didn't do its work professionally pretty unlikely considering its level but whatever. Edited by Stirlingsays (11 May 2023 12.45am) This has happened numerous times in this thread.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 May 23 9.36am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
This has happened numerous times in this thread. Got something right! Yes, it has, mostly by you.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 11 May 23 10.34am |
|
|---|---|
|
there we go again.....You are presented with facts and like stirling says all you do is try to discredit them
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 11 May 23 12.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
there we go again.....You are presented with facts and like stirling says all you do is try to discredit them I agreed with you!!! Just not who is doing it. You don’t know a fact from your elbow! Is your nickname “ole brown eyes”?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| eaglesdare 11 May 23 1.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I agreed with you!!! Just not who is doing it. You don’t know a fact from your elbow! Is your nickname “ole brown eyes”? Here we go again with more petty insults...you loose all credibility once you start that again....... All you do is smear and stigmatise anyone who asks legitimate questions or provides you with facts and or data.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.