Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
Apologies, but late to this party. I cant argue with any point, save that we are in a completely different world to the 70s. The Premiership is very, very big business. And to sell to the world, you have to play entertaining football. Our style is not good enough for the top half but good enough to beat most teams below us. The results are proving that. Mid table, entertaining fare, that will draw viewers and money. Very risky, of course, but what isn't? Everton have chucked vast sums at the task and have been compelled to revert to dull pragmatism just to survive. I prefer our model. hmm, not so sure about that. the overriding success is to be winning, surely. Chelsea never played 'entertaining' football, they were just super good at winning stuff. Not even sure what Entertaining football even is/ The world has an obsession with possession based build up from the back football. Unless that's played v.well, it bores my t*ts off. It too easily descending into slow, patient build up ending with 11 men behind the ball.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
hmm, not so sure about that. the overriding success is to be winning, surely. Chelsea never played 'entertaining' football, they were just super good at winning stuff. Not even sure what Entertaining football even is/ The world has an obsession with possession based build up from the back football. Unless that's played v.well, it bores my t*ts off. It too easily descending into slow, patient build up ending with 11 men behind the ball.
I hated United but agree with this. I don't find possession based football entertaining either. Steve Coppell's team of the late eighties and early nineties was direct and, at times, agricultural but everyone loved it.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rachid Rachid Rachid
I hated United but agree with this. I don't find possession based football entertaining either. Steve Coppell's team of the late eighties and early nineties was direct and, at times, agricultural but everyone loved it. 'We' may have loved it, but we were generally despised for it.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
No but apparently we had money to buy Gallagher in the summer. It would be nice to see our multi-billionaire owners finance the team rebuild, as others have done at clubs not dissimilar in size to us You begin with "no" and then you agree with me!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It's always fun seeing reading the posts explaining why PV has got it wrong from people who have probably less than 1% of his knowledge and experience. It's all about opinions of course.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Leeds have just announced the sacking of Jesse Marsch.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
You could say the same of the likes of Bobby Moore, Bobby Charlton and more recently Ray Wilkins, Tony Adams and Frank Lampard. Originally posted by HKOwen
It's always fun seeing reading the posts explaining why PV has got it wrong from people who have probably less than 1% of his knowledge and experience. It's all about opinions of course.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
Leeds have just announced the sacking of Jesse Marsch. Been given his 'Marching orders'... guarantee that'll be at least one headline. Suffice to say I and we should sincerely hope the recruiting of a replacement is shambolic and ultimately dooms them to failure. At least we know Dyche is now unavailable.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
It seems clubs will do anything for a couple of results and sacking the manager does seem to come with a subsequent 'bounce'. We can only hope it's a 'dead cat' one.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
Been given his 'Marching orders'... guarantee that'll be at least one headline. Suffice to say I and we should sincerely hope the recruiting of a replacement is shambolic and ultimately dooms them to failure. At least we know Dyche is now unavailable. They might have cast eyes in the direction of Carlos Corberan. He took Huddersfield to the play-off final the season after they finished in 20th place. This season when he took over at WBA after 16 games, the 'Baggies' were second from bottom in the table.Currently, after 29 games they are in the play-off places, in 6th. Edited by Willo (06 Feb 2023 3.28pm)
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Seems like the weekend was a big one for the bottom clubs.... our game in hand and cushion has all but gone.. we buckle against Brighton and those that picked up points do it again and we are looking over our shoulder and smelling the breath of relegation and here's the question... sobering as it is... Do we have any player or coach prepared to handle a relegation scrap???
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
hmm, not so sure about that. the overriding success is to be winning, surely. Chelsea never played 'entertaining' football, they were just super good at winning stuff. Not even sure what Entertaining football even is/ The world has an obsession with possession based build up from the back football. Unless that's played v.well, it bores my t*ts off. It too easily descending into slow, patient build up ending with 11 men behind the ball.
Take your point, but have you seen Serie A? And that is a "good" league to watch.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.