You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.
April 30 2024 11.43am

Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 196 of 209 < 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 >

 

View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 17 Apr 24 9.20am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Have a look at my most recent post - it's clear as day.

It even numbers every point the same way the poster does.

QED!

The reply will be interesting. If we get one!

Well done.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View NJ CLOCKTOWER's Profile NJ CLOCKTOWER Flag Tarragona 17 Apr 24 9.32am Send a Private Message to NJ CLOCKTOWER Add NJ CLOCKTOWER as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

I asked ChatGPT to compare Hamas and the UK Government - attached is the reply...

Edited by EverybodyDannsNow (17 Apr 2024 9.13am)

Oh the man who has no constructive arguments. The man who only writes in sound bites. The man who knows what I'm writing is true. the Man who cannot Address the core arguments in a debate. Can only come up with accusations and assumptions .Ignoring or deflecting points signals a weak position rather than engaging in constructive discourse.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Apr 24 9.32am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

QED!

The reply will be interesting. If we get one!

Well done.

I don't know anything at all about ChatGPT but am pretty sure others have referenced it in the past.
Is there any difference in using that as a reference rather than Wikipedia or Google in general?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 17 Apr 24 9.36am Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by NJ CLOCKTOWER

Oh the man who has no constructive arguments. The man who only writes in sound bites. The man who knows what I'm writing is true. the Man who cannot Address the core arguments in a debate. Can only come up with accusations and assumptions .Ignoring or deflecting points signals a weak position rather than engaging in constructive discourse.

Mate you’ve been caught with your pants down - you joined a forum and don’t even have the capacity to write your own posts. I can’t imagine how insecure you’d have to be to spend your time as such.

Hilarious really.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 17 Apr 24 9.39am Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

I don't know anything at all about ChatGPT but am pretty sure others have referenced it in the past.
Is there any difference in using that as a reference rather than Wikipedia or Google in general?

Certainly no problem using it as a reference, but there’s a big difference when it’s literally writing your posts for you. And then you lie about it when confronted.

I guess it’s akin to copy and pasting a whole Wikipedia article on here and trying to claim it as your own writing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View NJ CLOCKTOWER's Profile NJ CLOCKTOWER Flag Tarragona 17 Apr 24 9.40am Send a Private Message to NJ CLOCKTOWER Add NJ CLOCKTOWER as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Certainly no problem using it as a reference, but there’s a big difference when it’s literally writing your posts for you. And then you lie about it when confronted.

I guess it’s akin to copy and pasting a whole Wikipedia article on here and trying to claim it as your own writing.

You feel threatened or challenged in this debate, and I can feel your anger. Your accusation of AI to defend your position is laughable. You have no solid arguments you feel insecure about your stance.

Rallying others to your side reinforces your position to gain validation for your feelings. It's a defensive reaction rather than a constructive approach to resolving differences.

If you can't argue the points. If you can't have a constructive debate. Why do you even bother posting.?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Teddy Eagle's Profile Teddy Eagle Flag 17 Apr 24 9.45am Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Certainly no problem using it as a reference, but there’s a big difference when it’s literally writing your posts for you. And then you lie about it when confronted.

I guess it’s akin to copy and pasting a whole Wikipedia article on here and trying to claim it as your own writing.

Fair enough.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View NJ CLOCKTOWER's Profile NJ CLOCKTOWER Flag Tarragona 17 Apr 24 9.46am Send a Private Message to NJ CLOCKTOWER Add NJ CLOCKTOWER as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Mate you’ve been caught with your pants down - you joined a forum and don’t even have the capacity to write your own posts. I can’t imagine how insecure you’d have to be to spend your time as such.

Hilarious really.

You are accusing me without evidence in this debate . You are essentially making an unsupported claim, just like your posts about this conflict. It shows how weak your argument is because you lack credibility and you can be easily refuted by me.

Showing me your AI questions and responses doesn't approve a thing. It's crucial to provide evidence or logical reasoning to support your assertions in a debate to maintain integrity and persuade others effectively. Without evidence, your accusation holds little weight and can even damage your credibility.

I'm presuming you got your name from everybody dance now a track from the 90s when you were probably young but you still haven't changed it.

This might be why you don't have any constructive arguments and you just lash out like a little child

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View NJ CLOCKTOWER's Profile NJ CLOCKTOWER Flag Tarragona 17 Apr 24 10.01am Send a Private Message to NJ CLOCKTOWER Add NJ CLOCKTOWER as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

We can certAInly agree on that.

Don't make me laugh.Making baseless accusations like you are doing without evidence is a trait of narcissism, something that has a close connection with the woke fraternity because it reflects a sense of entitlement, a need for control, and a lack of empathy for others.

Narcissists often believe they are superior and entitled to judge or condemn others without needing factual support, just like you are doing. Your behavior serves to manipulate or control others on here,it serves to boost your own ego (check your username), or deflect attention from your own flaws or mistakes. It's a way for you to assert power and maintain a facade of superiority. Well, it might work with the weak-minded. It will not work with me. So ,unless you have factual evidence. It might be wise just to shut up.

Where have you suddenly disappeared to. You saw my post. I know you did. But now you can't answer them. Typical.

Cue more accusations...

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View EverybodyDannsNow's Profile EverybodyDannsNow Flag SE19 17 Apr 24 10.08am Send a Private Message to EverybodyDannsNow Add EverybodyDannsNow as a friend

Originally posted by NJ CLOCKTOWER

You are accusing me without evidence in this debate . You are essentially making an unsupported claim, just like your posts about this conflict. It shows how weak your argument is because you lack credibility and you can be easily refuted by me.

Showing me your AI questions and responses doesn't approve a thing. It's crucial to provide evidence or logical reasoning to support your assertions in a debate to maintain integrity and persuade others effectively. Without evidence, your accusation holds little weight and can even damage your credibility.

I'm presuming you got your name from everybody dance now a track from the 90s when you were probably young but you still haven't changed it.

This might be why you don't have any constructive arguments and you just lash out like a little child

are you even a Palace fan?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View silvertop's Profile silvertop Flag Portishead 17 Apr 24 10.10am Send a Private Message to silvertop Add silvertop as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I am hardly new, but I admit I can be verbose at times.

I am not though a lefty! I am a centralist who believes in capitalism with social responsibility. I only appear left to those who are themselves on the hard right fringe.

Some of the writing does have the flavour of AI authorship. No one has said it is. How could they know? Only that it reads like it. Maybe a new career awaits as a sub editor for AI output?

You are to them. They see the likes of us as side by side at the barricades in '68 or storming the Winter Palace.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 17 Apr 24 10.12am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow

Certainly no problem using it as a reference, but there’s a big difference when it’s literally writing your posts for you. And then you lie about it when confronted.

I guess it’s akin to copy and pasting a whole Wikipedia article on here and trying to claim it as your own writing.

Off topic I saw an article today from a Recruitment specialist who has had Zoom interviews with candidates. She gave examples of some using AI to answer her questions, they didn't get the job.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 196 of 209 < 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Gaza Strip 'invades' Israel.