Immigrants

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 14 of 14 << First < 10 11 12 13 14

pefwin Where you have to have an English ... 08 Feb 06 9.11pm
Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Feb 2006 7:29pm Quote pefwin at 31 Jan 2006 11:31pm Quote beestey at 05 Apr 2005 12:54am You stupid pieces of dumb-arse shyte who think it's somehow great to allow unlimited numbers of foreign scroungers into this country - I want to bestow the reality on you and send the whole feckin lot of them to you, in your stupid, brain-dead, piss-poor neighbourhood. I hope you do all get mugged, raped and buggered in Bromley soon, and then you might finally realise exactly what it is your lamentable spastic attitudes have wrought for us as a country. That's pretty racist. Should have been purged in the great 'Ozziebob' purge. Review the thread for additional racists. Unfortunately never banned. Took you a while to pick up on that one, Peffers. At least your response implies agreement, otherwise there would have been nothing to pick up. "Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."
Alert a moderator to this post

pefwin

Where you have to have an English ... 08 Feb 06 9.11pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Feb 2006 7:29pm

Quote pefwin at 31 Jan 2006 11:31pm

Quote beestey at 05 Apr 2005 12:54am

You stupid pieces of dumb-arse shyte who think it's somehow great to allow unlimited numbers of foreign scroungers into this country - I want to bestow the reality on you and send the whole feckin lot of them to you, in your stupid, brain-dead, piss-poor neighbourhood.

I hope you do all get mugged, raped and buggered in Bromley soon, and then you might finally realise exactly what it is your lamentable spastic attitudes have wrought for us as a country.

That's pretty racist. Should have been purged in the great 'Ozziebob' purge.

Review the thread for additional racists.

Unfortunately never banned.

Took you a while to pick up on that one, Peffers.

At least your response implies agreement, otherwise there would have been nothing to pick up.

"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 09 Feb 06 3.16pm
Quote pefwin at 08 Feb 2006 9:11pm Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Feb 2006 7:29pm Quote pefwin at 31 Jan 2006 11:31pm Quote beestey at 05 Apr 2005 12:54am You stupid pieces of dumb-arse shyte who think it's somehow great to allow unlimited numbers of foreign scroungers into this country - I want to bestow the reality on you and send the whole feckin lot of them to you, in your stupid, brain-dead, piss-poor neighbourhood. I hope you do all get mugged, raped and buggered in Bromley soon, and then you might finally realise exactly what it is your lamentable spastic attitudes have wrought for us as a country. That's pretty racist. Should have been purged in the great 'Ozziebob' purge. Review the thread for additional racists. Unfortunately never banned. Took you a while to pick up on that one, Peffers. At least your response implies agreement, otherwise there would have been nothing to pick up. It does? How do you work that one out? Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham
Alert a moderator to this post

Cucking Funt

Clapham on the Back 09 Feb 06 3.16pm

Quote pefwin at 08 Feb 2006 9:11pm

Quote Cucking Funt at 01 Feb 2006 7:29pm

Quote pefwin at 31 Jan 2006 11:31pm

Quote beestey at 05 Apr 2005 12:54am

I hope you do all get mugged, raped and buggered in Bromley soon, and then you might finally realise exactly what it is your lamentable spastic attitudes have wrought for us as a country.

That's pretty racist. Should have been purged in the great 'Ozziebob' purge.

Review the thread for additional racists.

Unfortunately never banned.

Took you a while to pick up on that one, Peffers.

At least your response implies agreement, otherwise there would have been nothing to pick up.

It does? How do you work that one out?

Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 11 Feb 06 12.49pm
Better than that the great brain that is Chavtastic Eagle said to me and I quote"I hope you get r8ped by a gang of immigrants and get aids" And they say the young of today are thick eh? My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs
Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 11 Feb 06 12.49pm

Better than that the great brain that is Chavtastic Eagle said to me and I quote"I hope you get r8ped by a gang of immigrants and get aids"

And they say the young of today are thick eh?

My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert a moderator to this post

Goalpost1 Worcester Park 21 Feb 06 10.40am
I don't wish to say what I currently do or be drawn further into what I've done previously but I have had considerable experience of the immigration sector. I've read all this thread and the split in views I have heard are very representational of those I've come across before. Talking specifically about refugees, it does annoy me when those say "keep them all out". True I have seen many who have no rightful claim for asylum and the government should do more to remove them but it is not as easy as marching someone straight to the airport and putting them on a plane as one or two have suggested. I have also seen a number of very genuine refugees. These include those who've experienced things like watching close family members killed in front of them and been subjected to repeated physical and sexual abuse. The UK has long had international obligations to provide protection to genuine refugees as have most other first world countries. As for those who comment on other systems like Australia you may be interested to learn that the likes of Australia and the USA take in many thousands of refugees every year. They are not "anti-refugee" by any means. One of their main methods is to take refugees direct from UN camps and have employed such systems for well over 20 years. The UK has only just started such a similar scheme albeit with much smaller numbers. Crime has increased through immigration and it would be foolish to think otherwise. A lot of this is tough to combat though, individuals involved often arrive clandestinely in the back of a lorry or arrive on high quality forged passports that are difficult to pick up. Once here they can disappear for years. I don't have a magic answer except to say to resource those combatting such criminality as far as possible. My personal views on immigration I think are fairly neutral, the one thing I would finish by saying is to echo Tome's sentiments. Please don't believe everything you read in the Mail and the Express on immigration. They are almost always sensationalistic and often inaccurate.
Alert a moderator to this post

Goalpost1

Worcester Park 21 Feb 06 10.40am

I don't wish to say what I currently do or be drawn further into what I've done previously but I have had considerable experience of the immigration sector. I've read all this thread and the split in views I have heard are very representational of those I've come across before.

Talking specifically about refugees, it does annoy me when those say "keep them all out". True I have seen many who have no rightful claim for asylum and the government should do more to remove them but it is not as easy as marching someone straight to the airport and putting them on a plane as one or two have suggested.

I have also seen a number of very genuine refugees. These include those who've experienced things like watching close family members killed in front of them and been subjected to repeated physical and sexual abuse. The UK has long had international obligations to provide protection to genuine refugees as have most other first world countries.

As for those who comment on other systems like Australia you may be interested to learn that the likes of Australia and the USA take in many thousands of refugees every year. They are not "anti-refugee" by any means. One of their main methods is to take refugees direct from UN camps and have employed such systems for well over 20 years. The UK has only just started such a similar scheme albeit with much smaller numbers.

Crime has increased through immigration and it would be foolish to think otherwise. A lot of this is tough to combat though, individuals involved often arrive clandestinely in the back of a lorry or arrive on high quality forged passports that are difficult to pick up. Once here they can disappear for years. I don't have a magic answer except to say to resource those combatting such criminality as far as possible.

My personal views on immigration I think are fairly neutral, the one thing I would finish by saying is to echo Tome's sentiments. Please don't believe everything you read in the Mail and the Express on immigration. They are almost always sensationalistic and often inaccurate.

Alert a moderator to this post

Anerley-Fried-Eagle Fake Beckenham actually 12 Apr 06 6.01pm
Like George Galloway says "we are all immigrants from some where". RIP ENGLISH FOOTBALL 24/6/14
Alert a moderator to this post

Anerley-Fried-Eagle

Fake Beckenham actually 12 Apr 06 6.01pm

Send a Private Message to Anerley-Fried-Eagle

Like George Galloway says "we are all immigrants from some where".

RIP ENGLISH FOOTBALL 24/6/14

Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 12 Aug 06 12.44pm
He'd be the first in the sea under Presidente Reborn.. Quote Anerley-Fried-Eagle at 12 Apr 2006 6:01pm Like George Galloway says "we are all immigrants from some where". My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs
Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 12 Aug 06 12.44pm

He'd be the first in the sea under Presidente Reborn..

Quote Anerley-Fried-Eagle at 12 Apr 2006 6:01pm

Like George Galloway says "we are all immigrants from some where".

My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert a moderator to this post

palacelad1 croydon 17 Aug 06 4.03pm
goalpost1 write us another essay wed all enjoy that! without lookin id have to say that the crime rate in less benefited parts of the world is considerably more than here, and the goverment moan about the overcrowding in british prisons althought they still allow immagrants to live here....britain for the british
Alert a moderator to this post

palacelad1

croydon 17 Aug 06 4.03pm

goalpost1 write us another essay wed all enjoy that! without lookin id have to say that the crime rate in less benefited parts of the world is considerably more than here, and the goverment moan about the overcrowding in british prisons althought they still allow immagrants to live here....britain for the british

Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 27 Aug 06 2.31pm
Quote Goalpost1 at 21 Feb 2006 10:40am I don't wish to say what I currently do or be drawn further into what I've done previously but I have had considerable experience of the immigration sector. I've read all this thread and the split in views I have heard are very representational of those I've come across before. Talking specifically about refugees, it does annoy me when those say "keep them all out". True I have seen many who have no rightful claim for asylum and the government should do more to remove them but it is not as easy as marching someone straight to the airport and putting them on a plane as one or two have suggested. I have also seen a number of very genuine refugees. These include those who've experienced things like watching close family members killed in front of them and been subjected to repeated physical and sexual abuse. The UK has long had international obligations to provide protection to genuine refugees as have most other first world countries. As for those who comment on other systems like Australia you may be interested to learn that the likes of Australia and the USA take in many thousands of refugees every year. They are not "anti-refugee" by any means. One of their main methods is to take refugees direct from UN camps and have employed such systems for well over 20 years. The UK has only just started such a similar scheme albeit with much smaller numbers. Crime has increased through immigration and it would be foolish to think otherwise. A lot of this is tough to combat though, individuals involved often arrive clandestinely in the back of a lorry or arrive on high quality forged passports that are difficult to pick up. Once here they can disappear for years. I don't have a magic answer except to say to resource those combatting such criminality as far as possible. My personal views on immigration I think are fairly neutral, the one thing I would finish by saying is to echo Tome's sentiments. Please don't believe everything you read in the Mail and the Express on immigration. They are almost always sensationalistic and often inaccurate. A secretary at my work used to work at the Home Office and she swears the figures are not true that are released. My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs
Alert a moderator to this post

reborn 27 Aug 06 2.31pm

Quote Goalpost1 at 21 Feb 2006 10:40am

A secretary at my work used to work at the Home Office and she swears the figures are not true that are released.

My username has nothing to do with my religious beliefs

Alert a moderator to this post

Catfish Burgess Hill 26 Oct 07 10.47pm
Quote reborn at 27 Aug 2006 2:31pm Quote Goalpost1 at 21 Feb 2006 10:40am I don't wish to say what I currently do or be drawn further into what I've done previously but I have had considerable experience of the immigration sector. I've read all this thread and the split in views I have heard are very representational of those I've come across before. Talking specifically about refugees, it does annoy me when those say "keep them all out". True I have seen many who have no rightful claim for asylum and the government should do more to remove them but it is not as easy as marching someone straight to the airport and putting them on a plane as one or two have suggested. I have also seen a number of very genuine refugees. These include those who've experienced things like watching close family members killed in front of them and been subjected to repeated physical and sexual abuse. The UK has long had international obligations to provide protection to genuine refugees as have most other first world countries. As for those who comment on other systems like Australia you may be interested to learn that the likes of Australia and the USA take in many thousands of refugees every year. They are not "anti-refugee" by any means. One of their main methods is to take refugees direct from UN camps and have employed such systems for well over 20 years. The UK has only just started such a similar scheme albeit with much smaller numbers. Crime has increased through immigration and it would be foolish to think otherwise. A lot of this is tough to combat though, individuals involved often arrive clandestinely in the back of a lorry or arrive on high quality forged passports that are difficult to pick up. Once here they can disappear for years. I don't have a magic answer except to say to resource those combatting such criminality as far as possible. My personal views on immigration I think are fairly neutral, the one thing I would finish by saying is to echo Tome's sentiments. Please don't believe everything you read in the Mail and the Express on immigration. They are almost always sensationalistic and often inaccurate. A secretary at my work used to work at the Home Office and she swears the figures are not true that are released. The figures are right enough, (inside track here), but what they cant spin is the fact that more people are arriving than we can get rid of. One of the problems is the numbers of foreign prisoners in jails who cannot be deported but are now clogging up immigration detention centres. Result - no room to arrest and deport anyone else. There is a general assumption that governments are both all powerful and incompetant. Both these things cant be true, well perhaps they can but if we were all powerful we would nt have a problem getting rid of failed asylum seekers. The reality is that it is not diifficult to find failed asylum seekers - the trick is to find the ones who will be accepted back by the home countries and we can overcome the multitude of legal obstacles put in the way. Asylum seekers get pretty much unlimited legal aid so they can afford to be represented by top Barristers and get the undivided attention of corrupt solicitors who are a leech on the taxpayer. To deport an asylum seeker you have to: - Find them - Pursuade their home country to give them a passport when you may not have any eveidence who they are because they destrotyed their documents when they arrived. - Win all the various appeals they get - Get past the Human Rights Act - Answer the unending representations from their MPs. Yes they have MPS in their pocket because people like Simon Hughes rely on the immigrant vote - Deal with blocking tactics such as bogus marriage applcations from British Citizens who get a couple of thousand for turning up at the registry office - Find somewhere to detain them, (see above), and keep them there long enough to deal with all the sh!t. Its a wonder we deport anyone at all. If we are serious about reducing the numbers of economic migrants then we have to stop the legal gravy train, get out of Europe and get our right to govern ourselves back. Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial
Alert a moderator to this post

Catfish

Burgess Hill 26 Oct 07 10.47pm

Quote reborn at 27 Aug 2006 2:31pm

Quote Goalpost1 at 21 Feb 2006 10:40am

A secretary at my work used to work at the Home Office and she swears the figures are not true that are released.

The figures are right enough, (inside track here), but what they cant spin is the fact that more people are arriving than we can get rid of. One of the problems is the numbers of foreign prisoners in jails who cannot be deported but are now clogging up immigration detention centres. Result - no room to arrest and deport anyone else.
There is a general assumption that governments are both all powerful and incompetant. Both these things cant be true, well perhaps they can but if we were all powerful we would nt have a problem getting rid of failed asylum seekers.
The reality is that it is not diifficult to find failed asylum seekers - the trick is to find the ones who will be accepted back by the home countries and we can overcome the multitude of legal obstacles put in the way.
Asylum seekers get pretty much unlimited legal aid so they can afford to be represented by top Barristers and get the undivided attention of corrupt solicitors who are a leech on the taxpayer. To deport an asylum seeker you have to:
- Find them
- Pursuade their home country to give them a passport when you may not have any eveidence who they are because they destrotyed their documents when they arrived.
- Win all the various appeals they get
- Get past the Human Rights Act
- Answer the unending representations from their MPs. Yes they have MPS in their pocket because people like Simon Hughes rely on the immigrant vote
- Deal with blocking tactics such as bogus marriage applcations from British Citizens who get a couple of thousand for turning up at the registry office
- Find somewhere to detain them, (see above), and keep them there long enough to deal with all the sh!t.
Its a wonder we deport anyone at all.

If we are serious about reducing the numbers of economic migrants then we have to stop the legal gravy train, get out of Europe and get our right to govern ourselves back.

Yes, I am an agent of Satan but my duties are largely ceremonial

Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_denizen filed under " time wasters " 24 Jul 09 2.29pm
How can the figures of the HOME OFFICE be true ? get on a bus through south london and just do a random estimate of how many passengers are british ? Laughing at Charlton - Every London Clyub's fourth or fifth most hated team - [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_denizen

filed under " time wasters " 24 Jul 09 2.29pm

How can the figures of the HOME OFFICE be true ? get on a bus through south london and just do a random estimate of how many passengers are british ?

Laughing at Charlton - Every London Clyub's fourth or fifth most hated team -
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

fcredblue london 12 Aug 09 1.44pm
so where is the police outside the home office after they have been rejected and are technically "illegal"? Ertl will score the best goal this season!
Alert a moderator to this post

fcredblue

london 12 Aug 09 1.44pm

so where is the police outside the home office after they have been rejected and are technically "illegal"?

Ertl will score the best goal this season!

Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_denizen filed under " time wasters " 17 Aug 09 10.59pm
Quote fcredblue at 12 Aug 2009 1:44pm so where is the police outside the home office after they have been rejected and are technically "illegal"? the british police are worse than useless. i would have more respect for a butlins redcoat patrolling our streets Laughing at Charlton - Every London Clyub's fourth or fifth most hated team - [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Palace_denizen

filed under " time wasters " 17 Aug 09 10.59pm

Quote fcredblue at 12 Aug 2009 1:44pm

so where is the police outside the home office after they have been rejected and are technically "illegal"?

the british police are worse than useless. i would have more respect for a butlins redcoat patrolling our streets

Laughing at Charlton - Every London Clyub's fourth or fifth most hated team -
[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 14 of 14 << First < 10 11 12 13 14

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Immigrants

Site Map

Sponsors