Steve Bannon to speak in Berkerly next week
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Penge Eagle  Beckenham 30 Sep 17 2.17am |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
there's yer man Stirling. Costing UC Berkeley hundreds of thousands of dollars just to be controversial. No the thousands of dollars are to stop fascist morons Antifa from attacking people and smashing up property. Good undercover video from Steven Crowder of how these violent scumbags operate [Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Sep 2017 2.19am)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
  |
| Stirlingsays 30 Sep 17 3.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
No the thousands of dollars are to stop fascist morons Antifa from attacking people and smashing up property. Good undercover video from Steven Crowder of how these violent scumbags operate [Link] Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Sep 2017 2.19am) Yeah, people should watch the video and then everyone should remember that this is the group that Nick has been backing. These are not respectable people coming out to protest the far right marching in their area. On this stuff Crowder hits the nail on the head....on other stuff...well. The, 'I want to kick my own arse' bit is hilarious.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 30 Sep 17 5.38am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Yeah, people should watch the video and then everyone should remember that this is the group that Nick has been backing. These are not respectable people coming out to protest the far right marching in their area. On this stuff Crowder hits the nail on the head....on other stuff...well. The, 'I want to kick my own arse' bit is hilarious. This is great... Crowder infiltrates an Anti-Trump Gay Karaoke Night (yes, really!) dressed as Trump Aprt from being quite funny, it actually raises interesting points about the grassroots left movement in the US. Edited by Penge Eagle (30 Sep 2017 5.39am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| jamiemartin721 Reading 30 Sep 17 5.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Exactly!! I know of NO one who doesn't have ID (of some kind) & Internet Access (in most cases unlimited Data) I think the salient point is that in a democracy no citizen should be prevented from voting or be forced to pay to participate in voting. The responsibility for resolving voter fraud should lie with the state not the individual. Voting is a principle founding basis of our societial function and a right. The cost should be borne by the state to resolve issues in the operation of the state, not the individual who participates. Regardless of the cost. The state has the capacity to deal with the problem far beyond that of each individual.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 01 Oct 17 2.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
He carries on even though he knows a lot on the right in America hate gays. It's also questionable that Berkeley have to pick up the cost. There are several things implied with this post that have holes. Your suggestion that political opinion should reflect the opinions of groups you think like you for some personal attribute. That is for the mentally weak. Gay conservatives are not exactly rare. Sure, the right contains the vast majority of those who are against homosexuality. However, these are a minority and Milo's popularity on the right is significant and the criticisms of him aren't about his sexuality. Milo's a social libertarian and so am I. On things like that I think he's wonderful. On your second point Berkeley is in part receipt of public funds and is....laughably meant to have something to do with free speech. When they, are at least, in part responsible for closing down 'free speech' week at Berkeley they are right to receive the criticism they get. Its current reputation for allowing the mistreatment of conservative voices is also there for all to see. Outside of 'progressive/regressive' circles its reputation has been considerably damaged in recent times.....Berkeley was always left facing due to its state but it wasn't as polarised. Thirdly, estimations on costs are made by Berkeley themselves. It is their 'progressive' students that form the large part of these protests. So this wound is a self inflicted one. They also charge ridiculously high amounts for the conservatives on their campus to invite speakers like Milo compared to progressive speakers. So, from my perspective, your point is moot. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Oct 2017 6.07am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 05 Oct 17 7.38am |
|
|---|---|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Oliver Bodega Bay 05 Oct 17 3.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Penge Eagle
In your examples, you would still have a driver's licence before these things happened? Besides, I was referring to ID cards – not driver's license. And the veteran would have a federal military ID. Unless you live under a rock, people attain some kind of ID to get in bars from the age of 21. Ah but it's sooooooo unfair on people who don't go to bars, innit? It's very interesting how large parts of the US on the coasts - where no ID or non photo ID is required - are Democrat strongholds! Edited by Penge Eagle (28 Sep 2017 6.11am) According to all research Trump would have still won the Election but lost the public vote. He really needs to get over it
I have prepared one of my own time capsules. I have placed some rather large samples of dynamite, gunpowder and nitroglycerin. My time capsule is set to go off in the year 3000. It will show them what we are really like. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Wonder if the election results would be the same if photo ID was enforced... Ray in Houston  Houston 05 Oct 17 3.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Oliver
According to all research Trump would have still won the Election but lost the public vote. He really needs to get over it He touts his electoral college strategy, and on this he is correct. He targeted the rust belt swing states with promises that he'd bring back their 20th century jobs and industries, and won them by a tiny margin. It was the only way he could win, and he pulled it off. Bleating about 3mm illegals voting to explain his popular vote loss - a meaningless stat in the grand scheme of things - actually undermines the one smart thing (in my humble opinion) that he's done. He's saying, in effect, that he won anyway and so his electoral college strategy was irrelevant. Of course, as we see every day, knowing when to shut up is not one of Trump's strong points.
We don't do possession; we do defense and attack. Everything else is just wa**ing with a football. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 15 Oct 17 1.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
More loveliness from the alt-right. No doubt there will be those leaping to Spencer's defence.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Penge Eagle Beckenham 15 Oct 17 1.25am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
More loveliness from the alt-right. No doubt there will be those leaping to Spencer's defence. Not me! The media should not give him any platform. WHY Do they do this? The reason is because they can smear centre-right opinions by lumping that moron on the far right with us.* And from your post, you've fallen for it Nick. Have you condemned far left group Antifa yet? *Having done the political compass test recently I came up bang centre. Edited by Penge Eagle (15 Oct 2017 1.31am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 15 Oct 17 2.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
More loveliness from the alt-right. No doubt there will be those leaping to Spencer's defence. Do you spend your life trawling for tosh like this? Your fanaticism is quite disturbing at times.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 15 Oct 17 2.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I watched 'This Week' on Thursday.....The BBC...a program most people in Britain get....I was watching that and heard a racist women basically paraphrase that 'white people are inherently evil'. The BBC has produced and aired a 'take' by trans model Munroe Bergdorf, in which white people are described as inherently racist and 'the most violent and oppressive force of nature on earth'. So why is it ok for the BBC to give air time to that crap and yet Richard Spencer doesn't get air time to raise his crap?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.