You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
May 1 2024 9.24am

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 213 of 411 < 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 >

 

View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Mar 23 5.37pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

I never thought I would feel sorry for the BBC management but Samson is trying to pull down the temple.

Lineker is a first class sh*t for putting the BBC in an untenable position they are dammed if they sanction him and dammed if they don't. He knew what he was doing and seems quite gleeful about it.

The issue for me and I suspect the BBC has now moved on from Gary to who actually runs the BBC them or Gary and his football mates. The lunatics cannot be allowed to run the asylum.

I suspect that the BBC will cave in which will only encourage the likes of me to demand an end to the licence fee, a pyrrhic victory for Gary and his chums.

As for the argument that he is a freelancer this doesn't hold water ask HMRC they are currently in conflict with Gary and a few others over this.

According to his supporters the BBC employs Gary's company not him well if that is true the why doesn't other employees of Gary's firm appear on MOTD? You call Pimlico Plumbers you don't get Gary Mullins you get whoever is available.

Gary has worked for the BBC for around 20 years not as a stand in when someone is on holiday but as their key sports presenter he is a de facto BBC employee.

Whatever happens here I think the BBC will come out of this badly and is yet another nail in their coffin all because he thinks his rights trumps everybody else. If you want free speech Gary join one of the other broadcasters who know doubt will be delighted to hear the political wisdom of a pampered ex footballer who happily takes money from dodgy regimes.

May all be true. Hiding behind a company is a tactic used by many high earners and designed for them by specialist accountants. I know where some well known ex footballers keep their overseas earnings, well out of the hands of the HMRC.

It's another issue though. This is only about whether someone working for the BBC in a sports capacity can be restrained from making comments on politics in their private time.

I am not sure that any contract, however worded, would survive in court if it got that far.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View inflikted's Profile inflikted Flag 12 Mar 23 5.40pm Send a Private Message to inflikted Add inflikted as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Was this aimed at me? I have only just noticed it!

If anyone ever proposed that we had "unlimited" immigration I don't think for a moment they would either be elected or, if in power, get it through parliament.

We have controlled immigration and a problem with illegal immigration as well as refugees being trafficked.

Honestly done trying to argue, there are no good faith actors here, just people desperately looking for a "gotcha" moment so they can parade about how they're right and the left are always wrong. There's no arguing with lost causes like that. Honesty, I thought Crystal Palace was one of the more liberal clubs due to the multicultural nature of South East London but its very hard right judging by this forum. Disgusting. And deeply disappointing.

 


Milkshakes Against Fascism

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Mar 23 5.42pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Only a total moron thinks this is about the subject of Lineker's tweets. This is about whether he can tweet them, or not. The government cannot be, and hopefully is not, involved.

So you think that there would have been such a fuss if Lineker had tweeted about gardening?

Don't be dumb.

Politics and entertainment should not mix. There needs to be strict and unambiguous rules about what you can say on social media if you work in broadcast media entertainment.

We all have opinions, and the fact that you happen to work on TV should not allow you to use that position to promote unqualified ideas.
The arrogance and ego of people like Lineker and Neville is not a new phenomenon and comes from a deluded narcissistic attitude that results from their perceived self importance.
In the past, you would have been thrown off TV never to work again for that kind of behaviour.

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (12 Mar 2023 6.06pm)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Mar 23 5.45pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines

This could have been cleared up quite easily if Gary had stepped back and apologised for any offence he may have caused to those who are associated with the German’s actions during the 1930’s. But he didn’t. He has an air of smug superiority that he is always right and therefore no apology is due. Clarkson had the good grace to do so, as have several others who have inadvertently caused offence. But I think Gary designed his comments to be controversial; as such he should reap the ‘benefits’ of his words.

Holding the views he does Lineker was never going to apologise to the hypocritical Braverman, especially when the offence was imaginary. She was the target and he hit it.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View steeleye20's Profile steeleye20 Flag Croydon 12 Mar 23 5.45pm Send a Private Message to steeleye20 Add steeleye20 as a friend

Creeping right-wing authoritarianism is the order of the day not leftism at all.

13 years has led to this, and there just seems a casual acceptance,
a lack of surprise at bullying, corruption stifling of protest no matter how minor.

And needless cruelty and inhumanity some people never change.


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Mar 23 5.45pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by inflikted

Honestly done trying to argue, there are no good faith actors here, just people desperately looking for a "gotcha" moment so they can parade about how they're right and the left are always wrong. There's no arguing with lost causes like that. Honesty, I thought Crystal Palace was one of the more liberal clubs due to the multicultural nature of South East London but its very hard right judging by this forum. Disgusting. And deeply disappointing.

Go and post on the BBS. There are plenty of blinkered loons to agree with there.

Truthfully, I'm sure you do already.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View inflikted's Profile inflikted Flag 12 Mar 23 5.48pm Send a Private Message to inflikted Add inflikted as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Go and post on the BBS. There are plenty of blinkered loons to agree with there.

Truthfully, I'm sure you do already.

I see you're back from your local Stormfront social to further prove my point. But I shouldn't bite and won't do so again.

 


Milkshakes Against Fascism

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Mar 23 5.49pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Creeping right-wing authoritarianism is the order of the day not leftism at all.

13 years has led to this, and there just seems a casual acceptance,
a lack of surprise at bullying, corruption stifling of protest no matter how minor.

And needless cruelty and inhumanity some people never change.


Or.... people are finally opening their eyes to the disaster this country has become because of mass immigration and ill-considered liberalisation.

There is a limit to all things.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Hrolf The Ganger's Profile Hrolf The Ganger Flag 12 Mar 23 5.51pm Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

Originally posted by inflikted

I see you're back from your local Stormfront social to further prove my point. But I shouldn't bite and won't do so again.

I've no idea what that is, and I couldn't care less what you do.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View ASCPFC's Profile ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 12 Mar 23 5.57pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

Creeping right-wing authoritarianism is the order of the day not leftism at all.

13 years has led to this, and there just seems a casual acceptance,
a lack of surprise at bullying, corruption stifling of protest no matter how minor.

And needless cruelty and inhumanity some people never change.

I think most are agreed with you that France must be pretty bad if everyone's so desperate to leave.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Mar 23 6.01pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

There is no such thing as absolute free speech and people like Lineker have to abide by his employer's terms and conditions of employment just as anyone wishing to post on HOL has to abide by their rules.

Why should BBC employees be free to comment on whatever subject they wish when the same freedom is not granted to footballers and cricketers whilst they are playing

I agree with both of these statements and have argued the same here for years. Others (you can guess who) fiercely disagree.

The problem with the bit in the middle is we don't actually know if that's enforceable unless it was tested in court. Non-disclosure agreements have been held to be invalid and against the public interest. I see the potential for such contractual restrictions being ruled unlawful.

Not everyone has the financial resource to challenge this. Lineker does.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Wisbech Eagle's Profile Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 12 Mar 23 6.08pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

So you think that there would have been such a fuss if Lineker had tweeted about gardening?

Don't be dumb.

Politics and entertainment should not mix. There needs to be strict and unambiguous rules about what you can say on social media if you work in broadcast media entertainment.

We all have opinions, and the fact that you happen to work on TV should not allow you to use that position to promote unqualified ideas.
The arrogance and ego of people Lineker and Neville is not a new phenomenon and comes from a deluded narcissistic attitude that results from their perceived self importance.
In the past, you would have been thrown off TV never to work again for that kind of behaviour.

I have it on good authority that the BBC's Director General is an avid reader of this site and posts under a pseudonym.

I have no doubt he is very grateful for your pearls of wisdom and will be giving them due consideration.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 213 of 411 < 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)