Glad to see you're keeping an eye on your health :-)

I'll agree with you on the liberalism agenda being everywhere. However, Liberalism (let's call it Neo-Liberalism these days) is the agenda of corporate consumerism and "rights for all" as long as those rights contribute to big business profits.

The day we start seeing the media call for Nationalisations and increased taxation of wealth is when we'll see a left wing bias.

Surely no one could accuse you of that.

Why that would be tantamount to calling me sarcastic.

So ethics are generally brought about by a consensus of moral and practical guidelines.

With liberalism etc, I just think that the language we use is just not nuanced enough to separate out the subtle differences between individual opinion. Clearly, people don't all think the same way but often align themselves to others who have similar views. They are often happy to be labeled in a particular way because of a tribal inclination.
I sometimes think that intellectualism and it's us to develop a philosophy actually obstructs meaningful progress in may situations.
Here we are debating the meaning of political social terminology while we could be solving a problem by just cutting through the detail and acting on instinct. I'm sure many real world decision makers do not have the luxury of a protracted internal conflict where they draw on complex philosophical arguments.
I think perhaps such considerations are often only reserved for dreamers,idealists and people on football websites.

It seems that even his own party are breaking from him. Alienating life long Republican career politicians, is quite an impressive feat.

What are his chances of living long if he becomes President.

Lots of people were saying that about Obama.

Democracy must prevail. Although based on previous US elections there might be some doubt about the validity of the result.