That statement is just my opinion, I didn't provide reasons and won't go into much detail here. The reason I didn't provide reasons is because I thought that the thread topic was being diluted into "To what degree are Trump's views idiotic", rather than considering (lack of) coverage of Hillary Clinton.

This diversion is fundamentally petty and diluted. Another example of pettiness would be for me to try and take apart your description of Trump's views as 'firm' in response to my initial post. That word is so vague it could mean anything and to suggest that from my post on Clinton that I'm against the whole concept of 'firm views', whatever you mean by that is absurd and reinforces my point.
Ok. Good Day.

Edited by EaglesEaglesEagles (01 Aug 2016 8.53pm)

I ain't got nuthin' funny to say. Sorry.

Perhaps he's a moron because he's a moron,not automatically just because he has firm views?Though personally,I think he's a dangerous and clever person who spouts nasty populist moronic sh+t to gain votes...and changes his views at times to suit the situation

Though,reading the below,perhaps,yup, he is a moron?

"The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive".

Trump on Twitter,2011.

Edited by legaleagle (01 Aug 2016 9.17pm)

There is no anti Corbyn language in those articles.

Are you seriously suggesting that Trump has been treated fairly by the BBC......As for what Trump thinks...that isn't the point, what is the point is the intrinsic balance of the BBC....Trump isn't Hitler but from how they portray him you could be forgiven for thinking he was.

The only thing I would agree with is that the BBC have given more air time to Corbyn's critics.....though his supporters have had far far far more airtime than any pushback from Trump supporters.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

There is no such thing as unbiased media. Choosing an angle is bias and is their Adam-Eve.

I, your glass,
Will modestly discover to yourself
That of yourself which yet you know not of.

Is the BBC biased? Blog [Link]

Its a bit unfair on Hitler, the National Socialist party, for all its evils, did actually have policies and ideals for which they stood and campaigned on, and did albeit briefly succeed in dragging Germany out of the mother of economic depressions and establishing it as a major world power in a surprisingly short time frame. Granted they were about as close to evil as you can get.

So, that's how bad Trump is, even the Nazi party compare preferably.

Trump's end goal is Trump and his kind, and f**k anyone else.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]