Wow, just wow, how frightening this is getting now.
I have copied to my inbox do you want me to pm it to you. I cannot even get my head around what is in it that needs censoring. I think be afraid as this s***s getting real.

your probably right it's just an easier way if establishing who they are spoke with a few people on the way to the BLM protest decent people we disagreed on a few things but still was civil and shook hands. If only antifa showed.

A snapshot's already been taken:

[Link]

But note that by flagging it as "wrongthink", no comments or discussions are allowed below the line. Isn't that just so convenient? Stifle debate, prevent further discussion of the points raised. The whole point of academic subjects like history is *exactly* that - to argue points of view, establish facts, separate dogma and ideology from actual events.

Now see how this Black academic's department has responded to the letter:

[Tweet Link]

"...it goes against our values as a department and our commitment to equity and inclusion."

So. Much. Orwell.

It is still available although deemed worthy of a trigger warning.

Which is really the point of it. Why are people not allowed to voice anything other than positivity towards BLM and accepting their narrative as the only one?

Personally I suspect that once the 'woke' types actually do really wake up and smell the coffee then the tide will turn and perhaps even quicker than people realise. Because whilst you average Soc.libs loves nothing better than British people losing their jobs and being replaced by those far, far more grateful foreign types, when it comes to their own cozy little worlds being impacted on, it is a different story.

Freedom of movement tends to end in terms of work once you move much about the £12-14 per hour bracket. Then it becomes a very closed shop.

But I am growing rather fond of BLM. In a world in which so many progressive types refuse to actually be upfront about why they truly believe, here we have clarity. For that, and that alone, I salute them.

A worthy opponent.

On the dissident right they also have issues with Churchill, but for different reasons.

Those that disagree with our declaring war after Poland I think are wrong and using 20/20.

I think Churchill took the only course of action that was going to save the British empire. It has to be seen within the context of the time.

Hitler was the direct threat to Britain so Germany was who we fought.

That doesn't mean that the outcome served everybody equally. It depended who you were.....Choosing between the Nazis and the Communists was like choosing between which type of man eating shark you wanted to share a pool with.

Hitler would have done to Britain what he did to France.....A lot of people would have died...far more than ended up dying in WW2.

Still, being on the winning side led to mass immigration. Skip forward eighty years and we are now being told we have to accept losing control within our main cities....I'm pretty sure Churchill would have gone berserk personally.

The British were first sold immigration after WW2 on the premise that it was temporary. Even the governments themselves thought they would go back.

After this the British whites were told that integration into British history and heritage was the key.....In reality it only worked when small numbers meant integration was absolutely necessary.

After that the authorities advanced the concept of multiculturalism, as the method by which integration would work.....this was an implicit admittance of the failure of integration.

Lie, after lie, after lie.....all waiting for the older generations to die off.

Finally, we are told that we should officially give up on the notions of integration and just accept that it's white's racism in their own country that is the problem.

Would the majority of those storming the beach still have stormed it?.....Yes, because they were doing it for there mates and the home they knew.....If they could see Britain now, would they risk their lives for that? Let's just say, I think the numbers willing to be called up would be far smaller.

Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Jun 2020 12.58pm)

A snapshot's already been taken:

[Link]

But note that by flagging it as "wrongthink", no comments or discussions are allowed below the line. Isn't that just so convenient? Stifle debate, prevent further discussion of the points raised. The whole point of academic subjects like history is *exactly* that - to argue points of view, establish facts, separate dogma and ideology from actual events.

Now see how this Black academic's department has responded to the letter:

[Tweet Link]

"...it goes against our values as a department and our commitment to equity and inclusion."

So. Much. Orwell.