This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Most Leave voters across all three countries think violence towards MPs is a ‘price worth paying’ for Brexit - 71% in England, 60% in Scotland and 70% in Wales. Shows what sort of a place we are in. I find that unbelievable. Do you have a link to the article
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
I find that unbelievable. Do you have a link to the article Was at the Guardian earlier this morning.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Because some of the biggest boneheads in the HoC are there because of who they are rather than what they represent. With the biggest of them all being the current PM?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Quote Key findings from the 2019 Future of England Survey, conducted by YouGov, show:
•Most Leave voters across all three countries think violence towards MPs is a ‘price worth paying’ for Brexit - 71% in England, 60% in Scotland and 70% in Wales. The majority of Remain voters across all three countries think violence towards MPs is a ‘price worth paying’ to Remain - 58% in England, 53% in Scotland and 56% in Wales. •A majority of Remain voters across all three countries think protests in which members of the public are badly injured are a ‘price worth paying’ to stop Brexit and remain in the EU - 57% in England, 56% in Scotland and 57% in Wales. Even larger majorities of Leave voters in all three countries think protests in which members of the public are badly injured are a ‘price worth paying’ to achieve Brexit - 69% in England, 62% in Scotland and 70% in Wales. I see that you omitted to mention that a majority of Remain voters also thought the same way. Where did they carry out their surveys? Detention centres and prisons perhaps Is that the same survey as the one about a month ago that said people would prefer the union break up than stop Brexit over a range of demographics?
|
|
|
Originally posted by DanH
It is invisible when you delete posts. Whilst leaving the piffle being responded to in place for all to see.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by jeeagles
Do you really think a second vote will win for remain? Go back to the first two posts on this thread. There have not been 200,000 job losses, house prices have slowed. Wages are up. Plus Germany are in recession, the EU are in denial, the only thing keeping them together is brexit and they have done nothing since the referendum to make reform or make people want to stay. That isn't the point. A second referendum will solve nothing anyway.
|
|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
which question was that? Is it so hard to check what you might have missed, either by mistake or deliberately? The question was:- "Please explain where on earth you see an insult in my post?" Now you have two to answer.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Sums it up for me
|
|
|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Quote Key findings from the 2019 Future of England Survey, conducted by YouGov, show:
•Most Leave voters across all three countries think violence towards MPs is a ‘price worth paying’ for Brexit - 71% in England, 60% in Scotland and 70% in Wales. The majority of Remain voters across all three countries think violence towards MPs is a ‘price worth paying’ to Remain - 58% in England, 53% in Scotland and 56% in Wales. •A majority of Remain voters across all three countries think protests in which members of the public are badly injured are a ‘price worth paying’ to stop Brexit and remain in the EU - 57% in England, 56% in Scotland and 57% in Wales. Even larger majorities of Leave voters in all three countries think protests in which members of the public are badly injured are a ‘price worth paying’ to achieve Brexit - 69% in England, 62% in Scotland and 70% in Wales. I see that you omitted to mention that a majority of Remain voters also thought the same way. Where did they carry out their surveys? Detention centres and prisons perhaps Hopefully it is very wide of the mark most people are just sick of it anyway.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That isn't the point. A second referendum will solve nothing anyway. Yes it will. Yes to Johnson or remain. Quite clear. It is essential that the public has the facts and they do this time.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That isn't the point. A second referendum will solve nothing anyway. Much as I don't want any referendums I don't think that is actually true. It won't stop people believing that to either leave or remain in the EU is best for us. What it would solve is knowing how many people still want to leave now we have had 3 years of experience of just how complex and difficult it is to untangle a Union. Knowing that might enable a compromise solution which sees us leaving, but in a way that everyone can live with. Make it strictly advisory, a consultation only, with it clearly understood that Parliament will take the final decision about how to interpret the information. As this Union has lasted just 40 years imagine the problems if Scotland ever did decide to separate.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Much as I don't want any referendums I don't think that is actually true. It won't stop people believing that to either leave or remain in the EU is best for us. What it would solve is knowing how many people still want to leave now we have had 3 years of experience of just how complex and difficult it is to untangle a Union. Knowing that might enable a compromise solution which sees us leaving, but in a way that everyone can live with. Make it strictly advisory, a consultation only, with it clearly understood that Parliament will take the final decision about how to interpret the information. As this Union has lasted just 40 years imagine the problems if Scotland ever did decide to separate. Yawn.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Much as I don't want any referendums I don't think that is actually true. It won't stop people believing that to either leave or remain in the EU is best for us. What it would solve is knowing how many people still want to leave now we have had 3 years of experience of just how complex and difficult it is to untangle a Union. Knowing that might enable a compromise solution which sees us leaving, but in a way that everyone can live with. Make it strictly advisory, a consultation only, with it clearly understood that Parliament will take the final decision about how to interpret the information. As this Union has lasted just 40 years imagine the problems if Scotland ever did decide to separate. A new referendum must be binding upon the government and parliament with legal and prompt implementation.
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
A new referendum must be binding upon the government and parliament with legal and prompt implementation. Article 50 is binding is it not?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
With the biggest of them all being the current PM? With a bit of luck we'll all find out on 12th December
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
With the biggest of them all being the current PM? Possibly but I bet he can count.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Is it so hard to check what you might have missed, either by mistake or deliberately? The question was:- "Please explain where on earth you see an insult in my post?" Now you have two to answer. stop talikng down to me and I may respond
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.