Las Vegas shootings
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
hedgehog50  Croydon 28 Oct 17 11.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I keep an open mind about everything but anyone accepting that the Kennedy assassinations were by lone nutters will believe anything. Like the princess Diana conspiracy theories, the means of killing the target are rather hit and miss. What are the chances of someone necessarily dying in a car crash or being shot dead from distance in a moving car? Surely these clever conspirators would choose a means of ensuring death.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Hrolf The Ganger 28 Oct 17 11.26am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Like the princess Diana conspiracy theories, the means of killing the target are rather hit and miss. What are the chances of someone necessarily dying in a car crash or being shot dead from distance in a moving car? Surely these clever conspirators would choose a means of ensuring death. Or maybe that is what they want you to think. We know our governments kill people, so why is anything surprising?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Stirlingsays 28 Oct 17 12.07pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I keep an open mind about everything but anyone accepting that the Kennedy assassinations were by lone nutters will believe anything. I never took you for a conspiracy theorist.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 28 Oct 17 12.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Or maybe that is what they want you to think. We know our governments kill people, so why is anything surprising? Surely their primary aim is to kill their target. In most of these scenarios there is more than a good chance that they would not succeed.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 28 Oct 17 12.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I never took you for a conspiracy theorist. What is one of those exactly? This is the problem with human psychology. If you question the official line you must be one of 'those' people. It is any surprise then that we can have stuff slipped passed us so easily? I don't believe for a minute that the Kennedy's were killed by lone gunman acting alone but that does not mean I believe in the Loch Ness Monster or that Elvis is alive or that Hitler lives on the Moon. All occurrences are different and require separate consideration and an open mind. A conspiracy theory is only a theory until it is prove true. Do you think that Dr David Kelly was murdered?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 28 Oct 17 12.33pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Surely their primary aim is to kill their target. In most of these scenarios there is more than a good chance that they would not succeed. That is a reasonable assumption but when you have to do stuff with plausible deniability or with no trail back, then things might not be ideal. On Diana, do you not find it suspicious that a man who was at the scene is found dead in the same burnt out car? That makes me wonder.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 28 Oct 17 12.37pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
What is one of those exactly? This is the problem with human psychology. If you question the official line you must be one of 'those' people. It is any surprise then that we can have stuff slipped passed us so easily? I don't believe for a minute that the Kennedy's were killed by lone gunman acting alone but that does not mean I believe in the Loch Ness Monster or that Elvis is alive or that Hitler lives on the Moon. All occurrences are different and require separate consideration and an open mind. A conspiracy theory is only a theory until it is prove true. Do you think that Dr David Kelly was murdered? No, I think he committed suicide.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 28 Oct 17 12.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
That is a reasonable assumption but when you have to do stuff with plausible deniability or with no trail back, then things might not be ideal. On Diana, do you not find it suspicious that a man who was at the scene is found dead in the same burnt out car? That makes me wonder. Who is this man? What do you mean he was in the same car? The same car as Diana?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 28 Oct 17 12.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
Who is this man? What do you mean he was in the same car? The same car as Diana? The same car that was at the scene.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 28 Oct 17 12.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by hedgehog50
No, I think he committed suicide. Even though a number of medical experts have said that the amount of blood loss at the scene and the wounds were highly unlikely to have killed him?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 28 Oct 17 12.43pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The same car that was at the scene. I'm none the wiser. If I Wanted someone killed I wouldn't arrange some sort of car crash were the target might get away with a bit of whiplash.
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| hedgehog50 Croydon 28 Oct 17 12.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Even though a number of medical experts have said that the amount of blood loss at the scene and the wounds were highly unlikely to have killed him? Was the inquest and everything part of the conspiracy then? How many involved in it?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.