You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 2 2026 10.16am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)


Page 387 of 1552 < 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 >
Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 11.49am

Originally posted by nickgusset

With all due respect, these kind of responses add nothing to a debate.

Is this the state of all those who appear to have liked what they are hearing and are behind an unprecedented closing in the polls?

It's a reality that the most fervent Labour supporters, in today's climate, are from the far left. It's why Labour are about to be battered in this election.

From within that group the 'nut' content is unsurprisingly high. So when a particularly 'nutty' comment is made I think it's fair enough to highlight its nuttiness.

I'd like to type the word, 'nut' again, just in case you feel it has been woefully underrepresented from within this post.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 11.53am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 11.52am

Originally posted by steeleye20

Will do the commas, ok.

Do we have professional negotiators isn't it civil servants?

The attempt will be genuinely appreciated.

Both.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 11.52am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 11.54am

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Let's see what happens on polling day.

I have already voted Tory.

I like my country properly defended and terrorism rejected and not pandered to myself. I also don't want a return to the 70's, especially as half the members of The Sweet are dead and I don't want a return to when unions ruled the country.

Terrorism is rejected by all parties but you can't bomb the crap out of Libya and expect there to be no reaction.

 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 12.19pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Terrorism is rejected by all parties but you can't bomb the crap out of Libya and expect there to be no reaction.

Are you saying that the Manchester atrocity would not have occurred if the UK had not participated in the NATO led action in support of UN resolutions?

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 12.26pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Are you saying that the Manchester atrocity would not have occurred if the UK had not participated in the NATO led action in support of UN resolutions?

Yes I am.

If it was you and some foreign power blew your family to bits you could be a terrorist to.


 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 12.29pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Yes I am.

If it was you and some foreign power blew your family to bits you could be a terrorist to.

Wow. It's hard to know what to say to such delusional people as you. So you think Manchester was justified?

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Jun 2017 12.38pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 12.30pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Terrorism is rejected by all parties but you can't bomb the crap out of Libya and expect there to be no reaction.

More nuttiness....Much more of this and there will be an activist campaign to tax the levels.

Britain's part in 2011 intervention in Libya was to be apart of a 10 country NATO-led coalition, later expanding to 19, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973.

The U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing force in Libya stated, the goal of intervention was 'to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack.' This was achieved.

Gaddafi’s forces were marching toward Benghazi and a massive massacre was about to occur. This is why we bombed Libya. Gaddafi's intention was clear. He called protesters 'cockroaches' and vowed to cleanse Libya 'inch by inch, house by house, home by home, alleyway by alleyway.' The Libyan people on the ground ultimately overthrew Gaddafi not us.

The Libya intervention has been used to present any foreign military intervention as a failure. The logic being that unless the country affected quickly becomes a stable, democratic country that the intervention must be viewed as a failure. Even when these interventions are not built upon the notion of nation building. These people don't of course think about what Libya would look like today if Nato hadn't intervened.

I think this type of thinking sees the world in a very short sighted and simplistic, 'good or bad', 'black and white' way. It fails to consider what the alternatives actually were. It's ignorance.

Terrorists give many justifications for what they do. You aren't going to stop attacks by appeasing these justifications. As IS have said themselves, they will attack us whatever we do.

Many of the far left apparently think that you can talk....the 'hug a jihadi' line. It confirms and promotes the contempt that many of them have for the weak western mind.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 12.32pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 12.37pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Yes I am.

If it was you and some foreign power blew your family to bits you could be a terrorist to.

'To' indicates motion.

'Too' indicates excess or 'also'.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 12.41pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

More nuttiness....Much more of this and there will be an activist campaign to tax the levels.

Britain's part in 2011 intervention in Libya was to be apart of a 10 country NATO-led coalition, later expanding to 19, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973.

The U.N. Security Council resolution authorizing force in Libya stated, the goal of intervention was 'to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack.' This was achieved.

Gaddafi’s forces were marching toward Benghazi and a massive massacre was about to occur. This is why we bombed Libya. Gaddafi's intention was clear. He called protesters 'cockroaches' and vowed to cleanse Libya 'inch by inch, house by house, home by home, alleyway by alleyway.' The Libyan people on the ground ultimately overthrew Gaddafi not us.

The Libya intervention has been used to present any foreign military intervention as a failure. The logic being that unless the country affected quickly becomes a stable, democratic country that the intervention must be viewed as a failure. Even when these interventions are not built upon the notion of nation building. These people don't of course think about what Libya would look like today if Nato hadn't intervened.

I think this type of thinking sees the world in a very short sighted and simplistic, 'good or bad', 'black and white' way. It fails to consider what the alternatives actually were. It's ignorance.

Terrorists give many justifications for what they do. You aren't going to stop attacks by appeasing these justifications. As IS have said themselves, they will attack us whatever we do.

Many of the far left apparently think that you can talk....the 'hug a jihadi' line. It confirms and promotes the contempt that many of them have for the weak western mind.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 12.32pm)

Whatever happened in Libya has nothing to do with us at all.

 

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 12.44pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Wow. It's hard to know what to say to such delusional people as you. So you think Manchester was justified?

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Jun 2017 12.38pm)

Of course I don't think it justified.

 

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 1.03pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Of course I don't think it justified.

But you said: "If it was you and some foreign power blew your family to bits you could be a terrorist too."

Leaving aside that you are saying I would be a terrorist, your statement clearly implies that you think it is justifiable to be a terrorist and carry out such acts as Manchester.
I've just seen on the BBC site that your terrorist chums have blown up mourners at an Afghan funeral -
no doubt wholly justified in your eyes.

Edited by hedgehog50 (03 Jun 2017 1.08pm)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 1.09pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Whatever happened in Libya has nothing to do with us at all.

Yes it does.

Lets break it down into a more digestible idea.

If you save your next door neighbour from the axe murderer then you make an enemy of the axe murderer. Some of the relations of the neighbour may come to resent you because it wasn't them who stopped him.

It doesn't mean you were wrong to stop the axe murderer.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 1.16pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 1.13pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Yes it does.

Lets break it down into a more digestible idea.

If you save your next door neighbour from the axe murderer then you make an enemy of the axe murderer.

It doesn't mean you were wrong to stop the axe murderer.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 1.10pm)

Steeleye is the kind of guy who thinks axe murderers are, in general, of great benefit to society and enrich us - the NHS would probably collapse without them, and that is is wrong to stereotype axe murderers.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

legaleagle Flag 03 Jun 17 1.17pm

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Steeleye is the kind of guy who thinks axe murderers are, in general, of great benefit to society and enrich us - .

The actual difference between yourself and Steeleye, old chap, might be that he actually thinks and you don't

 

Cucking Funt Flag Clapham on the Back 03 Jun 17 1.20pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

The actual difference between yourself and Steeleye, old chap, might be that he actually thinks and you don't

That, my dear Rumpole, is an utterly preposterous notion. It's the one thing he doesn't do and he invariably crumbles when challenged.

 


Wife beating may be socially acceptable in Sheffield, but it is a different matter in Cheltenham

hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 1.21pm

Originally posted by legaleagle

The actual difference between yourself and Steeleye, old chap, might be that he actually thinks and you don't

No doubt you agree with his weasel words on terrorism.

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 1.22pm

Unfortunately it happened its too late to do anything about it.

However foreign policy has to change IMO.

We are grotesque either bombing others ourselves or supplying the weapons for other countries to bomb and main innocent civilians.

 

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 1.41pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

Unfortunately it happened its too late to do anything about it.

However foreign policy has to change IMO.

We are grotesque either bombing others ourselves or supplying the weapons for other countries to bomb and main innocent civilians.

Well I completely disagree with your view of foreign policy. I think your ideas are terrible. There are countless families in Benghazi who would be dead if your ideas were followed. Many massacres have happened, even in the recent past, due to UN non intervention or delay. Intervention does not always mean nation building.

I have some sympathy for your view of arm sales but essentially you are voting to sack people. No one buys military weapons under the idea that they can't use them or the idea that they have to meet the approval of the supplier.

Those weapons will be purchased either way.

Attacks from terrorists groups will happen either way.


Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 1.52pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

steeleye20 Flag Croydon 03 Jun 17 1.56pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Well I completely disagree with your view of foreign policy. I think your ideas are terrible. There are countless families in Benghazi who would be dead if your ideas were followed. Many massacres have happened, even in the recent past, due to UN non intervention or delay. Intervention does not always mean nation building.

I have some sympathy for your view of arm sales but essentially you are voting to sack people. No one buys military weapons under the idea that they can't use them or the idea that they have to meet the approval of the supplier.

Those weapons will be purchased either way.

Attacks from terrorists groups will happen either way.


Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 1.52pm)

'you are voting to sack people'

How Tory that is never mind killing countless of innocent people I might lose my job !!


 

Stirlingsays Flag 03 Jun 17 2.10pm

Originally posted by steeleye20

'you are voting to sack people'

How Tory that is never mind killing countless of innocent people I might lose my job !!


Oh, the 'Tory is evil' stuff.

Like I said earlier, this is the state of the Labour party today.

You are going to be battered on June 8th and your simplistic views are a part of the reasons why that will happen.

Edited by Stirlingsays (03 Jun 2017 2.13pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Page 387 of 1552 < 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 >

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic