I believe effectively this bit is based on the idea that ‘the Left’ is trying to block us from being able to access our history. I wouldn’t have known anything about Colson were it not for the Left trying to make sure I can’t learn anything about him.

Which is to be celebrated

OK, if researching the lives of historical figures you've never heard of and making a judgement that they were bad people is a cause for celebration.

Better place? So the "bad" he did outweighs the "good".
I prefer the Edinburgh system of leaving statues and monuments but adding, where required, some information explaining what they did in a fuller context.

People who hate our history and historical figures aren't needed here.

Most of them aren't us or don't align themselves with us seeing themselves as more 'citizens of the world'. As was said earlier they instinctively look to criticise and pull down what we are. These people end up being a problem for most countries.

There's a border, they can cross it.

But they just won't go.
Tells you everything you need to know.

Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Jan 2023 1.07am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

That's the Charles Howard fan club for you.

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

What destalinisation?
What, the Judean People's Front, the People's Front of Judea and the Judean Popular People's Front?

Edited by georgenorman (13 Jan 2023 9.07am)

Thanks for your kind words

Iceni Rebellion (Failure confirmed Roman rule in Britain)
1066 (Failure confirmed Norman rule)
Bannockburn (English kicked out of Scotland)
Dunkirk (Allies defeated but brought home to the public this was total war and stiffened morale).

To name just a few, all defeats not airbrushed because of the significant consequences.

If it happen last week the English Armada would be newsworthy when you are looking at 3000 years of English history it's not.

One more point

What grinds my gears on this is not the actions here themselves but rather the inspiration or driving force behind it and therefore general tone.

I still maintain this is not a racial thing at all, it's a cultural thing which has little to do with ethnicity and more to do with the empowerment of failures today. It's people who have little else to hang an identity they can take pride in on and therefore seen as an 'easy win' to martyr themselves or acquire some sort of status within this community. Doesn't matter whether you come from a 'BAME' background or some white kid who was bullied at school, it's the same sentiment and we see the whole spectrum of these types.

There's a difference between objectively looking to review the narrative to provide a factual and balanced representation of somebody and just attacking whomever you can as you think this validates your existence. I can't be the only one who was told 'stop moaning' as a youngster (particularly on the football pitch for me, often around the criticism of the belief in 'throwing the ball down the line' - why???) but I understand why as an adult even if I didn't then.

Slavery was an awful, truly unimaginable by today's society, part of history however it is part of history, aligned to many cultures, geographical regions and peoples. That should be acknowledged. I'm not saying we have to deify such people but to try and remove them from history for a fault assigned to them by the standards of today when their initial place was due to their achievements and contributions to build the society we now have is quite unbalanced and ungrateful IMHO. It's a bit like a child, whether biological or adopted, attacking a parent who provided them a fantastic life, and an inheritance to live well now, on the basis they were 'a bit of a prick at work' after scrutinising their biography. I also think to claim outrage, injustice and social reform off the back of the suffering of others is quite repugnant too. There's plenty of people, from all walks of life and backgrounds, who can and may acknowledge these things but for whom actually building something with their own lives is far more important than tearing down others. That needs to be acknowledged for balance too.

I do understand the 'attack on British heritage' stance, even if I don't think it's as cut and dry to be completely labelled as that. If there was a well intended and balanced approach perhaps rename after somebody, from a plentiful lot to choose from, who did contribute to British and World history with a cleaner record instead of a couple trees out front? There would appear to be no intention to do that however, it is solely for many to enjoy the most arrogant possible belief: that they as individuals are ushering in some sort of Utopia as they are the very best a human can and ever has been and therefore have the right to set the world straight. A world they've probably contributed little to I will add.

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!