This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
BlueJay ![]() |
|
---|---|
Wuhan residents remember coronavirus 'whistleblower' doctor a year after his death - [Link]
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
So mandatory quarantining will start in 10 days time when people returning from the 30 high risk Covid countries will have to stay in designated hotels. The question is what is happening to them up until then.....like now?
Bring back Brolin |
|
![]() |
![]() |
BlueJay ![]() |
|
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
So mandatory quarantining will start in 10 days time when people returning from the 30 high risk Covid countries will have to stay in designated hotels. The question is what is happening to them up until then.....like now? Unnervingly little most likely.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
From lions led by donkeys
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Of course true but that's not the point I am trying to make. If we need China to change then we need them to co-operate and want to change. Understanding how they think and knowing how best to handle them, and how not to handle them, is my point. It's no different to any other situation where negotiation and compromise are needed to get the desired result. If force is out of the question, and it certainly appears to be, then negotiation and diplomacy are our only weapons. Trade wars won't work in these circumstances. Only reasoning with mutual self-interest as the key element would seem to have a chance of success. Therefore reigning in the rhetoric is in our own ultimate interests. Why would China want to change? They have monopolised the world trading/ manufacturing markets, have invested heavily throughout the World and therefore basically can do what they like. Will they want to negotiate? Of course not, why would they unless economic pressures are applied but even then IMO it is too late.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by dynamicdick
So mandatory quarantining will start in 10 days time when people returning from the 30 high risk Covid countries will have to stay in designated hotels. The question is what is happening to them up until then.....like now? Any traveller needs to have had a negative COVID test within 72 hours of travel. On arrival or prior to arrival they have to complete the track and trace form ( they get issued with fine if they refuse), they then have to self-isolate, but of course, this is barely monitored.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
COVID-19: 'Extremely unlikely' coronavirus came from Wuhan lab, says joint mission
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
And so the script that we thought was already written is now factual. A theory that the coronavirus leaked from a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan has been discredited as "extremely unlikely" by an international team of investigators. Peter Ben Embarek, head of a World Health Organization-led mission to the city, said the idea that an incident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was behind an outbreak would not be pursued further. "The laboratory incident hypothesis is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus into the human population," he said during a news conference. "Therefore is not in the hypotheses that we will suggest for future studies." The team has also announced that they had found evidence of the wider circulation of the coronavirus in December 2019 beyond a seafood market where it was reported to have begun. Edited by The Dolphin (09 Feb 2021 11.44am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
And the only people in the world who actually believe this theory are - the Chinese - and not even all of them i suspect!
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
And so the script that we thought was already written is now factual. A theory that the coronavirus leaked from a laboratory in the Chinese city of Wuhan has been discredited as "extremely unlikely" by an international team of investigators. Peter Ben Embarek, head of a World Health Organization-led mission to the city, said the idea that an incident at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was behind an outbreak would not be pursued further. "The laboratory incident hypothesis is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus into the human population," he said during a news conference. "Therefore is not in the hypotheses that we will suggest for future studies." The team has also announced that they had found evidence of the wider circulation of the coronavirus in December 2019 beyond a seafood market where it was reported to have begun. Edited by The Dolphin (09 Feb 2021 11.44am) Well what a surprise! Isn’t one of the experts working in China? I would like to see where they claim it started. Disgraceful cover up. Funny how scientists fell ill in Wuhan with Covid like symptoms in late 2019. Edited by Spiderman (09 Feb 2021 11.51am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Trump was right about both the Chinese and the WHO.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Read this and say it’s not a cover up. “ sitting alongside Chinese counterparts”
Edited by Spiderman (09 Feb 2021 11.59am)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.