Richard Seymour - vile human being.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 sickboy  Deal or Croydon 05 Sep 15 9.05am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote Northern Panda at 05 Sep 2015 8.51am
This "thing" is the epitome of a generation that believes their point of of view is correct and that anything that vies either left or right is wrong. He does not have the commitment to become a journalist and thus spouts abusive trite to justify his self importance. Anyone with half a brain knows exactly what he is about...an offensive bigot.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| oldcodger 05 Sep 15 9.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Northern Panda at 05 Sep 2015 8.51am
This "thing" is the epitome of a generation that believes their point of of view is correct and that anything that vies either left or right is wrong. He does not have the commitment to become a journalist and thus spouts abusive trite to justify his self importance. Anyone with half a brain knows exactly what he is about...an offensive bigot.
Edited by oldcodger (05 Sep 2015 9.28am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Red Al Reading 05 Sep 15 10.23am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 05 Sep 15 10.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Can a mod give themselves a yellow?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 05 Sep 15 11.06am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 10.23am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721
With regard to your support of Corbyn's stance on "negotiated solutions, rather than fighting wars"... in 1982 we had no choice - Argentina invaded the Falklands and refused to leave despite being told to do so by the UN. In 1939 Neville Chamberlain tried your approach by "appeasing" Adolf Hitler and securing Peace in Our Time Hitler reneged on his promise and showed Chamberlain to be a naïve, dangerous politician that nearly led us to defeat by the Nazis. Thanks heavens Winston Churchill was there to pick up the pieces. Corbyn is dangerous too - he naively believes that abandoning our nuclear deterrent is a good thing whilst unstable countries like North Korea and Iran continue to arm themselves.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| oldcodger 05 Sep 15 11.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
The comment was clearly just a bit of dark humour.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| leggedstruggle Croydon 05 Sep 15 11.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 10.23am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721 What are things coming to when our Jamie is regarded as right wing!? Mind you it has always been a comrade eat comrade world.
mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Red Al Reading 05 Sep 15 1.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 05 Sep 2015 11.06am
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 10.23am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721
With regard to your support of Corbyn's stance on "negotiated solutions, rather than fighting wars"... in 1982 we had no choice - Argentina invaded the Falklands and refused to leave despite being told to do so by the UN. In 1939 Neville Chamberlain tried your approach by "appeasing" Adolf Hitler and securing Peace in Our Time Hitler reneged on his promise and showed Chamberlain to be a naïve, dangerous politician that nearly led us to defeat by the Nazis. Thanks heavens Winston Churchill was there to pick up the pieces. Corbyn is dangerous too - he naively believes that abandoning our nuclear deterrent is a good thing whilst unstable countries like North Korea and Iran continue to arm themselves.
The willingness to go to war that is often displayed in the UK (particularly by the right wing press) seems to ignore the humanitarian and the political consequences of war. The wars in the Middle East, the instability in Egypt. Iraq, Libya and Syria and the refugee crisis we are now seeing are all the direct consequence of western aggression and warmongering. But it seems that those arguing for a peaceful resolution are considered to be the dangerous ones! What kind of twisted logic is that?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 05 Sep 15 2.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 1.38pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 05 Sep 2015 11.06am
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 10.23am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721
With regard to your support of Corbyn's stance on "negotiated solutions, rather than fighting wars"... in 1982 we had no choice - Argentina invaded the Falklands and refused to leave despite being told to do so by the UN. In 1939 Neville Chamberlain tried your approach by "appeasing" Adolf Hitler and securing Peace in Our Time Hitler reneged on his promise and showed Chamberlain to be a naïve, dangerous politician that nearly led us to defeat by the Nazis. Thanks heavens Winston Churchill was there to pick up the pieces. Corbyn is dangerous too - he naively believes that abandoning our nuclear deterrent is a good thing whilst unstable countries like North Korea and Iran continue to arm themselves.
The willingness to go to war that is often displayed in the UK (particularly by the right wing press) seems to ignore the humanitarian and the political consequences of war. The wars in the Middle East, the instability in Egypt. Iraq, Libya and Syria and the refugee crisis we are now seeing are all the direct consequence of western aggression and warmongering. But it seems that those arguing for a peaceful resolution are considered to be the dangerous ones! What kind of twisted logic is that?
Do behave.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| legaleagle 05 Sep 15 5.12pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 05 Sep 2015 11.06am
JM721 is not a "right wing" poster! With regard to your support of Corbyn's stance on "negotiated solutions, rather than fighting wars"... in 1982 we had no choice - Argentina invaded the Falklands and refused to leave despite being told to do so by the UN. In 1939 Neville Chamberlain tried your approach by "appeasing" Adolf Hitler and securing Peace in Our Time Hitler reneged on his promise and showed Chamberlain to be a naïve, dangerous politician that nearly led us to defeat by the Nazis. Thanks heavens Winston Churchill was there to pick up the pieces. Corbyn is dangerous too - he naively believes that abandoning our nuclear deterrent is a good thing whilst unstable countries like North Korea and Iran continue to arm themselves. JM's "gassing" comments were inappropriate IMO, regardless of whether in jest or irrelevant of whether he was right or left wing (and I don't think he's either).
viz.negotiated settlement in N Ireland. viz. negotiated settlement emerging between Kosovo and Serbia viz. negotiated settlement between Indonesia and East Timor.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Red Al Reading 05 Sep 15 5.47pm |
|
|---|---|
|
B Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 05 Sep 2015 2.42pm
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 1.38pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 05 Sep 2015 11.06am
Quote Red Al at 05 Sep 2015 10.23am
Quote suicideatselhurst at 05 Sep 2015 1.49am
Quote Red Al at 04 Sep 2015 10.32pm
I can't quite believe what bile some people post on here. Seymour's comments about Simon Weston are completely unacceptable and do not represent anything but that writers own views, but that hasn't stopped some bloggers on here tarring virtually all left wingers with the same brush. No evidence is given to support such claims but when did evidence or reasoned argument ever matter? Has anyone actually looked at what Simon Weston is supposed to have responded to? This is a right wing rant against Jeremy Corbyn cooked up by the Telegraph based on comments made by Corbyn over two years ago, that don't actually represent Labour Party policy and also don't state that Corbyn wants to hand the Falklands over to Argentina. He simply suggested that seeking negotiated solutions to international problems is better than fighting wars - but then printing the reality behind some concocted rubbishing of a left wing politician would be a step too far for our right wing bigoted press. As for gassing anyone who expresses views you might disagree with, that's a comment that is beneath contempt!
"Personally, I'd gas Bloggers, columists and opinion piece writers on the basis that they offer nothing of value beyond stroking their own ego. But I've been told that would be against the law." - JamieMartin721
With regard to your support of Corbyn's stance on "negotiated solutions, rather than fighting wars"... in 1982 we had no choice - Argentina invaded the Falklands and refused to leave despite being told to do so by the UN. In 1939 Neville Chamberlain tried your approach by "appeasing" Adolf Hitler and securing Peace in Our Time Hitler reneged on his promise and showed Chamberlain to be a naïve, dangerous politician that nearly led us to defeat by the Nazis. Thanks heavens Winston Churchill was there to pick up the pieces. Corbyn is dangerous too - he naively believes that abandoning our nuclear deterrent is a good thing whilst unstable countries like North Korea and Iran continue to arm themselves.
The willingness to go to war that is often displayed in the UK (particularly by the right wing press) seems to ignore the humanitarian and the political consequences of war. The wars in the Middle East, the instability in Egypt. Iraq, Libya and Syria and the refugee crisis we are now seeing are all the direct consequence of western aggression and warmongering. But it seems that those arguing for a peaceful resolution are considered to be the dangerous ones! What kind of twisted logic is that?
Do behave. Don't be such a patronising prat. You might try reading what I wrote. As for fighting back against invading foreign powers, that's what so many countries have tried to do against Britain over hundreds of years, most recently Iraq. But as others have very sensibly stated, war should be a last resort but sadly that's not usually the case.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 05 Sep 15 6.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
The silver lining was at least we won in the Falklands unlike Iraq and Afganistan. Edited by pefwin (05 Sep 2015 7.08pm)
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.