The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Stirlingsays  21 Mar 19 10.40am |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
I've had salmonella and it really isn't very nice but I'd take another dose right now to get out of the EUSSR. Some remainer musical types, who want another referendum, should get together and re-record 'Back in the EUSSR'.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| steeleye20 Croydon 21 Mar 19 11.02am |
|
|---|---|
|
Petitions site crashes after 600,000 back call to revoke article 50....
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 21 Mar 19 11.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
It's why we had a Foot & Mouth outbreak in 2000/2001 Feeding crap to cows & most of it an EU Directive, how's that for partisan drivel? Now back to you're Pilates & wind your neck in. Sorry, Pilates? What? Are you five? And sorry, is it still 2001? Ah no, it's not. Do our food standards represent a blend of directives from us and from the EU? Yes they do. Are all the British ones good and the EU ones bad? No they're not. Are you still spooning out inaccurate partisan tripe (I thank you)? Yes you are. Now back to your cookie dough, pissy beer and mouthfuls of hormonal hotdog with lightly chlorinated slaw. Seems to be doing the job.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 21 Mar 19 11.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Don't bet against Steeleye and Pussay Fair point
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 21 Mar 19 11.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Petitions site crashes after 600,000 back call to revoke article 50.... Pretty meaningless. If it reaches 20 million then let us know. Even then, the chance of A50 being revoked is about as likely as me voluntarily devouring a freshly chlorinated bird wrapped in malleted hormonal rump steak.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| steeleye20 Croydon 21 Mar 19 11.17am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Pretty meaningless. If it reaches 20 million then let us know. Even then, the chance of A50 being revoked is about as likely as me voluntarily devouring a freshly chlorinated bird wrapped in malleted hormonal rump steak. Watch this space......
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Pussay Patrol  21 Mar 19 11.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DANGERCLOSE
Remainers: Remind me, with actual evidence, why you are so scared of a clean WTO 100% Brexit. What consequences to you foresee? Things will cost more, it will harm the economy in many ways, puts our security at risk Why do you want it? What do you get out of it personally?
Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DANGERCLOSE london 21 Mar 19 11.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Petitions site crashes after 600,000 back call to revoke article 50.... If Article 50 is revoked, could the government let us know which votes will be ignored going forward? Would save a trip to the polling station.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cpfc_chap  koh samui 21 Mar 19 11.46am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
Things will cost more, it will harm the economy in many ways, puts our security at risk Why do you want it? What do you get out of it personally? For me Things outside the EU will cost less
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| blackheatheagle Beckenham 21 Mar 19 11.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by W12
Who is stronger on the NHS Labour or Tory? Stronger? the answer here is neither when we are bringing in 250,000 net new people per year (more if you take into account significant numbers leaving the country) you simply cannot keep up and cannot keep taxing people to support a bloated NHS and social security system. I may be missing the point you want to highlight but what makes you think that 250,000 newcomer is a direct extra work for NHS assuming majority of them are taxpayers? On top of this, Tier 2 visa holders need to pay extra £400 per year per person for NHS. This means a `family of 3` pays £6000 for 5 year visa which sounds fair probably to avoid any short-term complication for services. There is average 25,000 main application approved which means nearly 60-70000 of newcomer is under Tier 2. It is for sure a fact that there was a flooding to some certain areas due to free movement in EU which had blocks in services. But assuming that `forecasting this impact` was not a rocket science, not sure how goverments can not be liable of this outcome? As 250,000 newcomer is output of their previous policies, they are supposed to find a solution proactively to address future complications. Edited by blackheatheagle (21 Mar 2019 11.51am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| W12 21 Mar 19 12.10pm | |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by blackheatheagle
I may be missing the point you want to highlight but what makes you think that 250,000 newcomer is a direct extra work for NHS assuming majority of them are taxpayers? On top of this, Tier 2 visa holders need to pay extra £400 per year per person for NHS. This means a `family of 3` pays £6000 for 5 year visa which sounds fair probably to avoid any short-term complication for services. There is average 25,000 main application approved which means nearly 60-70000 of newcomer is under Tier 2. It is for sure a fact that there was a flooding to some certain areas due to free movement in EU which had blocks in services. But assuming that `forecasting this impact` was not a rocket science, not sure how goverments can not be liable of this outcome? As 250,000 newcomer is output of their previous policies, they are supposed to find a solution proactively to address future complications. Edited by blackheatheagle (21 Mar 2019 11.51am) First of all the cost of the NHS averages £2,200 per person per year which kind of blows that argument out of the water. I would counter "assuming majority of them are taxpayers" with a much fairer assumption that a significant number will be non taxpayers and therefore tax consumers as such. "250,000 newcomer is output of their previous policies" - yes but nobody voted for this and nobody can tell us why when the government state that they want to reduce this to "tens of thousands" it just isn't happening and you know a Labour government would just make this worse. Even worse than this just raising the question immediately exposes you to accusations of racism and you are shut down from all sides. It just has to stop.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 21 Mar 19 12.53pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Sorry, Pilates? What? Are you five? And sorry, is it still 2001? Ah no, it's not. Do our food standards represent a blend of directives from us and from the EU? Yes they do. Are all the British ones good and the EU ones bad? No they're not. Are you still spooning out inaccurate partisan tripe (I thank you)? Yes you are. Now back to your cookie dough, pissy beer and mouthfuls of hormonal hotdog with lightly chlorinated slaw. Seems to be doing the job. RACIST.... Rattled are you Hun?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.