The Brexit Thread (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Beanyboysmd  03 Jun 19 9.48pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by johnno42000
I'm not really up on things to do with European regulations. Is there a regulation that says you can't? Must admit I have no idea but I did think that the East Coast Line was taken back into public ownership. Actually im a remainer and I remember hearing something similar...I think you can but if its public it has to go to tender to another country. I will double check because even at the time I thought it was weird...
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Badger11 Beckenham 03 Jun 19 9.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Therefore we are now 1 day closer to the cancellation of Brexit. In your opinion others opinions are available (for now anyway). And Parliament should have a say on a no deal Brexit I have no issue with that. Of course the outcome may not be what you think.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 03 Jun 19 9.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Thought you were in the US? Didn't know they were in the EU. Sorry did I twist what you said...what's good for the goose and all that
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Maine Eagle USA 03 Jun 19 10.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Thought you were in the US? Didn't know they were in the EU. Sorry did I twist what you said...what's good for the goose and all that My word that is a pointless post. This country, meaning the country in question. I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 03 Jun 19 10.21pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Ho hum another day in the books. And the ever present truth remains: The WA is dead and can never be reanimated. There will never be a no deal crash out of the EU which is signed off on by parliament. Bercow will ensure parliament has a say on that and that even charming, cuddly, harmless toff prime ministers cannot decree that unilaterally. The only way a no deal exit can happen, is if it is explicitly voted for by the public. The only way a no deal exit will be put on the ballot paper, is if revoking article 50 is next to it. There is no way on earth more people in this country want a no deal exit, than want to stay in the EU. Therefore we are now 1 day closer to the cancellation of Brexit. And equally the failing bloc.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 03 Jun 19 10.32pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
My word that is a pointless post. This country, meaning the country in question. I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here. And here is what Midland Eagle replied to you: Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 03 Jun 19 11.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Beanyboysmd
Actually im a remainer and I remember hearing something similar...I think you can but if its public it has to go to tender to another country. I will double check because even at the time I thought it was weird... I believe you can nationalise if there remains competition. So part nationalisation is feasible.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Maine Eagle USA 04 Jun 19 12.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
And here is what Midland Eagle replied to you: Originally posted by Midlands Eagle And he was as wrong then as you are now. I don’t change quotes of others when replying. Go read it again, spidey, as your spidey sense is off and I await an apology from Midlands Eagle.
Trump lost. Badly. Hahahahahahaha. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 04 Jun 19 6.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Maine Eagle
I didn’t twist what you said, spidey, I just hit “reply” and quoted what you said, exactly as it was, which is pretty common around here. I had hoped to leave this one behind but obviously not so here is exactly what was said:- Originally posted by Spiderman
Don't think ME said he disliked them and showed no prejudice towards them did he? Originally posted by Maine Eagle
Think your spidey sense is a bit off again here, Pete. You don’t think he showed no prejudice, that would be a double negative. You didn't quote exactly what was said as you left out "Don't think ME said he disliked them" which correctly has a single negative as does the second half that you did quote so by editing the quote you made an incorrect point. Now can we leave it please
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 04 Jun 19 7.03am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I believe you can nationalise if there remains competition. So part nationalisation is feasible. Part nationalisation? Sounds very much like the Chinese system. Isn't that just a form of state assistance to companies?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 04 Jun 19 8.23am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Part nationalisation? Sounds very much like the Chinese system. Isn't that just a form of state assistance to companies? That is precisely what is not supposed to happen. In theory it is a level playing field. East Coast Mainline was in State hands for over 5 years
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 04 Jun 19 8.35am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
That is precisely what is not supposed to happen. In theory it is a level playing field. East Coast Mainline was in State hands for over 5 years In theory I could play left back for Palace.....I wouldn't advise it though. I'm not fundamentally against re-nationalisation of the railways as the way privationisation was handled and structured has resulted in rail having priced out many people......when it's meant to be a national rail service. I could be convinced....but surely the practicalities and cost would be strong arguments against.....it leads me to suspect that it's not really a sensible path to pursue.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.