You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump
April 26 2024 3.01pm

Bias against Trump

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 12 of 573 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

 

01CPFC Flag central coast NSW (The Mariners Mi... 26 Jul 17 10.48pm

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Edited by Guntrisoft (28 Jul 2017 2.16pm)

 


Where is the Joker shown, I haven't used it ?

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Farawayeagle's Profile Farawayeagle Flag Sydney 26 Jul 17 10.51pm Send a Private Message to Farawayeagle Add Farawayeagle as a friend

I listen to a lot of local US Radio and most people seem more interested in jobs,Healthcare,education etc. Russia and this
Legal navel gazing is of little interest compared to having a job or putting food on the table. The political class obsessing about this kind of stuff and gotcha politics is what got Trump elected.

 


Founder Of The Crystal Palace Roller Coaster
Association

An Affiliate Of The Never A Dull Moment Club

R.I.P. DJ Hardline -- Gone Way Too Soon

GKAS Member 54

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Farawayeagle's Profile Farawayeagle Flag Sydney 26 Jul 17 10.52pm Send a Private Message to Farawayeagle Add Farawayeagle as a friend

Originally posted by 01CPFC

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzz

What he said

Edited by Guntrisoft (28 Jul 2017 2.16pm)

 


Founder Of The Crystal Palace Roller Coaster
Association

An Affiliate Of The Never A Dull Moment Club

R.I.P. DJ Hardline -- Gone Way Too Soon

GKAS Member 54

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 17 1.13pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's a crazy world.

It isn't how I'd do it but that's just my opinion. If they are going to maintain that kind of system then under that criteria I don't see how they can be fairly denied.

The American healthcare system is so problematical....All I can see is disaster ahead in that area.

The US healthcare system is so f**ked up its more akin to Doublespeak. I think it emphasis why nationalised health systems (even ones like the French and German with Private Cover) make sense.

Its kind of odd that in the US as a prisoner you are entitled to health care, that a general citizen wouldn't automatically get.

Also most US Health care plans don't cover pre-existing conditions or mental health (which means you could easily leave mental health care, with a 200,000 plus medical bill).

I think all but the most ardent hardcore Libertarians or Right wingers would agree that its pragmatically easier and probably more cost effective to have a system of national health care across the board for citizens.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 17 1.19pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

So if you get 'dirt' from another country on your opponent then you are committing a crime by accepting that?

Seems like nonsense to me.

Favours in return...I see the sense of that.


Edited by Stirlingsays (26 Jul 2017 6.28pm)

Only if a) your a politician or running for office and b) you obtain it from a foreign government or representative. Its conspiring with a foreign power - Especially if they've say obtained that information from say intelligence assets.

I mean, the US has a hard on for Assange and all he did was use documents provided by someone else.

I mean what could be the risks of a President, with close ties to one of the worlds most corrupt regimes where there is only technical differences between being a business man, politician, spy and gangster.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 27 Jul 17 1.24pm

Originally posted by wordup

I wonder if those who have already had gender realignment treatment will now be kicked out? At that point surely any treatment wouldn't cost the military much and they may even be able to legally argue that they are now the sex they have reassigned to and are not trans anyway.

Of course I don't think any of them should be kicked out, but I'm just thinking about how it might pan out.

No, because that would be illegal. Its an odd way of 'saving costs' given there are only between 120 and 300 transgendered service men and women.

There is an interesting documentary about a transgender Navy Seal who spent 20 years in the US military. Its worth noting that Trump effectively dodged call up five times during the Vietnam war with postponements.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 28 Jul 17 1.10am

Fascinating to see this mess devour itself over time. The new comms director:

On why he’s better than Steve Bannon: “I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own cock. I’m not trying to build my own brand off the fcking strength of the president.”

On Reince Priebus, who Scaramucci said “cock-blocked” him for six months: “Reince is a fcking paranoid schizophrenic, a paranoiac.”

Edited by wordup (28 Jul 2017 1.18am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
wordup Flag 28 Jul 17 1.18am

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

No, because that would be illegal. Its an odd way of 'saving costs' given there are only between 120 and 300 transgendered service men and women.

There is an interesting documentary about a transgender Navy Seal who spent 20 years in the US military. Its worth noting that Trump effectively dodged call up five times during the Vietnam war with postponements.

I can't see anything changing anyway really: “There will be no modifications to the current policy until the President's direction has been received by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary has issued implementation guidance.”

Also Trump's "I consulted the military about the transgender ban" is, like most things he blurts out for attention, more fantasy land material [Link]

This is an administration with all of the seriousness of a panto.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Jul 17 4.20am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

Only if a) your a politician or running for office and b) you obtain it from a foreign government or representative. Its conspiring with a foreign power - Especially if they've say obtained that information from say intelligence assets.

I mean, the US has a hard on for Assange and all he did was use documents provided by someone else.

I mean what could be the risks of a President, with close ties to one of the worlds most corrupt regimes where there is only technical differences between being a business man, politician, spy and gangster.

Well, from the digging I've been doing it's not illegal to accept information from a foreign power. What is illegal is 'conspiracy'. It's intent to use that information to break the law.

This is all speculation and it's extremely hard to prove anything. I don't see anything coming from this.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Jul 17 4.22am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by wordup

Fascinating to see this mess devour itself over time. The new comms director:

On why he’s better than Steve Bannon: “I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own cock. I’m not trying to build my own brand off the fcking strength of the president.”

On Reince Priebus, who Scaramucci said “cock-blocked” him for six months: “Reince is a fcking paranoid schizophrenic, a paranoiac.”

Edited by wordup (28 Jul 2017 1.18am)


Proper entertainment. Completely crazy of course but Trump kind of enables craziness.
It's a strength and a weakness.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Jul 17 4.24am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by wordup

I can't see anything changing anyway really: “There will be no modifications to the current policy until the President's direction has been received by the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary has issued implementation guidance.”

Also Trump's "I consulted the military about the transgender ban" is, like most things he blurts out for attention, more fantasy land material [Link]

This is an administration with all of the seriousness of a panto.

Hopefully we get a good trade deal.....but yeah, it's certainly a panto at the moment.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 28 Jul 17 4.33am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by jamiemartin721

No, because that would be illegal. Its an odd way of 'saving costs' given there are only between 120 and 300 transgendered service men and women.

There is an interesting documentary about a transgender Navy Seal who spent 20 years in the US military. Its worth noting that Trump effectively dodged call up five times during the Vietnam war with postponements.

It's wrong to burden your employer with costs not related to your contract with them. The US needs to wake up and implement common sense.

Did you complain about Bill Clinton not going to Vietnam? It doesn't exclude him from his commander in chief position no more than it did Clinton.

Trump went to military school and he and his family did what a lot of unethical rich families did and avoided the mincer.

It's a black mark against him in my book but it's no different to many politicians and more than one President.

Edited by Stirlingsays (28 Jul 2017 4.34am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 12 of 573 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Bias against Trump