Better the devil you know though. You may get what you wish for and an even more hard line (you think) republican leader.

Maybe your thinking is flawed. Imagine that.
Irrespective of what Trump does or doesn't do, the media is heavily biased towards the Left/Liberal. Trump could be the best President ever and it would make no difference.

My thinking may well be flawed in some minds, but not in those with both eyes and ears open and at least half a brain able to discern truth from lies.

Trump is, in my opinion, by far the worst President of my lifetime. And that list includes Nixon, who was a shining beacon of honest endeavour in comparison. Many in the USA who possess a greater knowledge of all the past Presidents than me, consider him the worst ever. So to simply dismiss the media criticism of him as tribal politics is to totally miss the point. This man is an exception and exceptional men deserve exceptional treatment. Which is why he is getting it.

I am used to the lack of objectivity in the Trump support base in the USA, having had many exchanges with them over the years, which continue until today.

It is always though disappointing to witness it here as we are generally much better than that.

To see the term "TDS" used in a recent post (not by yourself) is an example of that. The term, which in case anyone is unfamiliar is meant to be short for "Trump Derangement Syndrome" and is intended as an insult to those who criticise him. It's the standard Trump modus operandi. Never answer criticism. Attack the attacker. Counter sue those who sue as we have more money and better lawyers. He learned it from Roy Cohn and has employed it ever since. His supporters, like the good sycophantic sheep they are, parrot it endlessly. To see it here though is really disappointing. Especially as the term is actually defined in the "Urban Dictionary" as:-

"Trump Derangement Syndrome, is the unwavering adoration and devotion to a political leader, beginning with Donald Trump the namesake of the disorder, extending to other forms of leadership including presidents and rulers typically of a fascist or populist nature. While the name is meant to have pejorative connotations the actual condition is characterized primarily by behaviors found in "cult of leader" or "cult of personality" scenarios."

As the term doesn't appear to have made it into the major dictionaries that will have to do.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Not in any way. It just happened to be the only one which provided any kind of definition so something being better than nothing was the intention.

Oddly it also provides the first result if you search for "soy boy", which a more traditional dictionary describes as:-

"Associated with the alt-right, soyboy is an insult used online for men seen as effeminate liberals. It comes from the myth that consuming soy products lowers testosterone levels in a man"

Which is also rather apposite. Alt-right insults by Trump defenders. Who would have imagined it?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

The labelling isn't always inaccurate either.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Maybe you will try it one day.