Ref: Palace v Everton
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
chateauferret  19 Nov 17 2.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
FFS even Shearer who is as anti Palace as any referee said it was a dive....you are the ONLY one who thinks Taylor got it right!! You are very strange if you really are a Palace fan as you say! He isn't. Established fact.
============ |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 becky  over the moon 19 Nov 17 2.41pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
We all saw that Niasse's tumble was somewhat theatrical but we couldn't all see if there was any contact.Clearly Taylor thought there was sufficient contact to warrant the penalty but of course on 'Slo-Mo' replays others have formed a different opinion. Watching on a live stream where the camera angle was exactly the same as the referee's to the incident (except he was a t ground level and much closer in) and even then you could clearly see that he went over like he had been shot from nothing more than a brush of shoulders. Slo-Mo not necessary.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
 |
 Dangermouse Hastings 19 Nov 17 2.44pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Plenty of evidence Willo, watch every game and see how many fouls are given for Zaha.....compared to the fouls for most other players....how many penalties did Bobby madly give zaha...none how many fouls on him did madley give about half.....The clown yesterday was bent, we know it, you know it ,he knows it, just you wont admit the possibilty of one of your hero refs being corrupt or useless or both....you'll just be happy to see us relegated with a lot of help from so called referees. There is so much money in football and betting on football nowadays that the possibility of corruption is growing day by day...you will see in the future just how wrong you are to defend to the death your great referee heros I do actually believe in the next 5 years something will come out about corruption. All the money in the prem and we're to believe that no dodgy s*** is going on, financially or performance enhancing wise?
That's Life |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 2.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
Maybe you could explain the punishment he may or may not receive at the assessment and how exactly any punishment will help us (the team that he cheated). There is no assessment or punishment for crap refs is there otherwise most refs would be demoted each week and we cant have that can we. Thats the reason the FA refuse to sanction video technology because it would highlight just how totally appalling the referees are! I'm NOT going to respond to ANY posts which accuse referees of cheating.It really is reprehensible and repugnant to cast such aspersions.Thank you.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 2.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
OK ill ask you again.....'and then what happens and how does that help us?? What do you want ? Retrospective issuing of yellow/red cards, goals chalked off ? Ridiculous. There is a support mechanism for the Elite group of referees including post-match analysis, group discussions of incidents with fellow referees etc etc etc to try and assist referees and further improve their standards.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 19 Nov 17 2.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
This is quite an interesting read and the key point is this: "We must blame the managers and supporters and the TV pundits who tolerate it – and who openly praise it, like former England striker Michael Owen during commentary the other week at a Champions League match. " Willo - that means you.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian Online The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.52pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by chateauferret
He isn't. Established fact. I know I had him down as a weed troll!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| the silurian Online The garden of England.(not really) 19 Nov 17 2.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
What do you want ? Retrospective issuing of yellow/red cards, goals chalked off ? Ridiculous. There is a support mechanism for the Elite group of referees including post-match analysis, group discussions of incidents with fellow referees etc etc etc to try and assist referees and further improve their standards. No that isnt what I want Willo, stop trying to put words in my mouth. All I want is fair unbiased honest refereeing and that IS NOT WHAT WE HAD YESTERDAY.... you still havent answered what happens to refs found guilty of incompetence??
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 19 Nov 17 2.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Willo
What do you want ? Retrospective issuing of yellow/red cards, goals chalked off ? Ridiculous. There is a support mechanism for the Elite group of referees including post-match analysis, group discussions of incidents with fellow referees etc etc etc to try and assist referees and further improve their standards. You clearly can't have a system in which the results are amended after the match because surely nobody wants results of matches hanging in the balance waiting for some panel to pronounce on them. Chaos. Docking points wouldn't be a bad idea though. Given the technology available today and already in use in other sports, it isn't too much to ask that the FA do everything possible to make sure the decisions are right.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Dangermouse Hastings 19 Nov 17 3.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Can't review everything. I would like them to trail coach challenges.
That's Life |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| becky over the moon 19 Nov 17 3.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Dangermouse
I do actually believe in the next 5 years something will come out about corruption. All the money in the prem and we're to believe that no dodgy s*** is going on, financially or performance enhancing wise? It wasn't that many years ago that we had all the floodlight failures that were being rigged by a Malaysian betting ring to facilitate the results they wanted. That was pretty basic and the world and technology has moved on a lot since then (1990's I believe it was), but just because it may all have got more sophisticated and harder to spot/prove doesn't mean that it isn't happening.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
|
| Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 19 Nov 17 3.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by the silurian
No that isnt what I want Willo, stop trying to put words in my mouth. All I want is fair unbiased honest refereeing and that IS NOT WHAT WE HAD YESTERDAY.... you still havent answered what happens to refs found guilty of incompetence?? I'm not going down the 'Incompetence' route.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.