Time traveller from 2030
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Midlands Eagle  16 Feb 18 6.36am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You've been watching too much X Files
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
| Lyons550 Shirley 16 Feb 18 8.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Do you really think that any such evidence wouldn't be quickly disappeared by the authorities? Quite probably...but with so many people having access to social media, that won't be as easy as it once was....
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Pikester Worthing 16 Feb 18 11.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
The bloke's crackers.
You fed me, you bred me, I'll remember your name. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 16 Feb 18 12.00pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Pikester
The bloke's crackers. Cream.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| I'mPalace Till I Die 16 Feb 18 1.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Hold on... Time travel is already proven I thought. I listened to Busted and they had been to the year 3000. Now I'm confused
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Park Road  16 Feb 18 1.31pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Can't explain it, but I'm getting a real feeling of " Déjà vu" reading these posts.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ouzo  Rafina 16 Feb 18 1.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
It is quite simple to prove if genuine. He claims to be 50 years old in 2030, which would make him 38 now. Just find his younger self, take DNA samples from both and check they match. As for robots playing football, they would have to ensure they don't run on binary coding or all scores would be 0-0 1-0 or 1-1.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
palace_in_frogland  In a broken dream 16 Feb 18 2.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
And would the seven additional robots in the team run on subroutines?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Vaibow vancouver/croydon 17 Feb 18 1.32am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Not necessarily. The time you go to might be in a different reality. Paradoxes like in films are ridiculous. They could not possibly happen. You cannot alter a past that has already happened which led to the circumstances in which you travelled back. I liked it in 12 monkeys (or was it 13) where they went back in time to change something - but in going back created that very event... like you say, you can't change the past so if can go back and did, it's already happened and nothing will change as a result.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Vaibow vancouver/croydon 17 Feb 18 1.37am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Lyons550
I've seen a number of these videos lately on Youtube and whilst incredibly sceptical myself it would appear that 2028 keeps coming up as the year that it's 'revealed' that time travel is possible and that we've been doing it for a while!Anyone heard of the 'Philidelphia experiment'?
This is a fantastic conspiracy theory - basically time travel is possible through manipulation of matter through vibration. Magnets set up, speakers set up, a certain frequency wave is produced which levitates objects or it's elements/atoms merge with that around it. So they tried to transport an entire navy ship to the future without telling the crew, it went wrong and the ship basically go broken down at a sub atomic level and then when the vibration stopped, everything seemed back to normal... trouble is, the men and women onboard, some were dead, fused to the bulk head, some went mad with what they saw... some missing... fascinating.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
chateauferret  17 Feb 18 1.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Well when you consider that time runs at different relative speeds depending on how close you are to mass, anything seems possible. I have found that time actually stands still sometimes depending on who's preaching.
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chateauferret 17 Feb 18 1.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Not necessarily. The time you go to might be in a different reality. Paradoxes like in films are ridiculous. They could not possibly happen. You cannot alter a past that has already happened which led to the circumstances in which you travelled back. You can if you don't mind an awkward interview with Captain Annorax. Temporal incursions tend to be frowned upon. In the real universe however consider whether it would violate any natural laws. Travel to the past would appear to violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics (one of whose implications is that the arrow of time can only move forwards), which is usually a pretty good sign that something's impossible. Superluminary travel would appear to violate the Special Theory of Relativity. However, laws of nature have in the past turned out to have been incorrectly or incompletely stated when more knowledge has become available (as in the case of Newton's model of gravity compared with Einstein's). Edited by chateauferret (17 Feb 2018 1.59am)
============ |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.