Yes I know he is. It’s what I said as well. I said they bought in with something like 50 for the shares at the current value and another 50 supposed to be ringfenced to bring the total to their percentage share of what the club is worth when the main stand is finished.

I just wasn’t clear in my first post but was in my second.

COYP

[Link]

Wouldn't it just.

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

1. If he wants to leave and has had his head turned you might as well let him go. 2. 50m is an amazing bit of business for a youth player that didn't cost us a penny and has played less than 50 games total for Palace.
AWB is a really good prospect but he is not the finished article and there are other right backs out there that will do a good job. He's a lot easier to replace that Wilf too. Selling him has zero to do with any takeover. If a deal was struck to buy out the yanks tomorrow AWB will still be leaving.

Dont know whether its a good move so early in his career, and there's a long road ahead. Maybe he needs to be reminded of what happened to Wilf., and stay put . At his age he doesnt need the money (in my opinion) as he will get much more 3/4/5 years ahead.
MONEY ISNT EVERYTHING IS IT!!!!!
At Palace he is loved by all of us and that should be a spur to stay, and not become a Man U pleb((and grab him cos they've got the lotsofcash mentality)) . Oh I do so h.te that team along with Arsenal/ManC and Chelski

What we are talking about here is a transfer of assets. We have sold a fairly intangible asset with no balance sheet value and now have £50m in a mixture of cash and debtors which is probably going to be of much more interest to any investor