Coronavirus (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 Mapletree  Croydon 06 Aug 20 9.18pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I thought they were mainly keeping an eye on people who want the agreed democracy in Hong Kong, and a Muslim minority they are imprisoning. But if Texas is their thing then yee hah to them. Apparently there are plenty of Chinese people available to keep their eyes on things.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Spiderman Horsham 06 Aug 20 9.56pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Them peer reviews take time. Bit like the grooming gang report?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
ASCPFC  Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Aug 20 10.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Apparently there are plenty of Chinese people available to keep their eyes on things. Except when it comes to viruses, or anti government activities. Then no one saw anything, apparently.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  06 Aug 20 10.41pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Hmm. What do you know about the American Council of Science and Health? In 2017, 26 health, environmental, labor and public interest groups sent a letter to USA Today, asking them to "refrain from publishing further columns authored by members of the American Council on Science and Health, or at the very least require that the individuals identify the organization accurately as a corporate-funded advocacy group". The FDA said that the organization is a sham, an industry front. I’ve never heard of them - just thought was interesting that The Lancet might not be entirely apolitical.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 06 Aug 20 10.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
I’ve never heard of them - just thought was interesting that The Lancet might not be entirely apolitical. Or it publishes checked facts that do no favours to groups with axes to grind and financial skin in the game. You choose
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 06 Aug 20 10.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Or it publishes checked facts that do no favours to groups with axes to grind and financial skin in the game. You choose Does that mean what they printed isn’t true? I have no idea as The Lancet isn’t on my reading list.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 06 Aug 20 11.06pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Does that mean what they printed isn’t true? I have no idea as The Lancet isn’t on my reading list. Basically published a set of research that came from seemingly falsified data and retracted it.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 06 Aug 20 11.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Basically published a set of research that came from seemingly falsified data and retracted it. Wow, someone is confused. This is about hydroxychloroquine. Absolutely nowt to do with the research on schools reopening or the withdrawal of US experts from China.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Mapletree Croydon 06 Aug 20 11.38pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Does that mean what they printed isn’t true? I have no idea as The Lancet isn’t on my reading list. Then how on Earth do you keep up to date with the pathophysiology of lymphedema for goodness sake?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 07 Aug 20 6.15am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Then how on Earth do you keep up to date with the pathophysiology of lymphedema for goodness sake? To be honest I’m not much of a fan of prog rock. In fact I’ve never heard of this band. Any good?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 08 Aug 20 9.54am |
|
|---|---|
[Tweet Link]
Plus heard there’s 15,000 people per month who’d be diagnosed as cancer patients not going in.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 08 Aug 20 11.16am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Wow, someone is confused. This is about hydroxychloroquine. Absolutely nowt to do with the research on schools reopening or the withdrawal of US experts from China. Not confused at all. This is the Lancet and whether it prints facts or not. That was what was being asked. I could have given other examples but this is the most relevant to Covid 19. The Lancet printed politically motivated research which was rubbish.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.