I understand your point too but does it actually matter whether at first glance we are unable to classify someone?

Would it not produce a more healthy society if we were unable to make judgements solely on appearances and had instead to wait until the character was revealed?

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Unfortunately, there is a lot of mileage in division for politicians and activists of a certain type.
Unfortunately, these kinds of people blur the lines of people's genuine concerns around prejudice and immigration.
There are perfectly reasonable concerns by all parties around the mixing of cultures, the issues surrounding being a minority, criminality among minorities, the loss of traditional British culture and the future political and heritage issues around the rapid and huge influx of non Europeans.
There are those who encourage and exploit the darker side of that for their own ends. This does not make the concern any more or less reasonable.
The terms Black and White are divisive, and I believe that minorities in particular hurt themselves by using these labels. They will never be considered truly part of the homogenous group until they become colour blind.
For the European British, I see no reason why anyone should be expected or forced to like or accept the rapid reduction and replacement or their kind by migrants.
It is just not natural to celebrate the demise of your genetic heritage and future. If you do, it is through years of brainwashing.

What a delicious statement - made apparently free from any irony.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

There is a lot of truth in what you say and we seem to be reaching a mutual understanding on this matter.

How we handle these issues going forward isn't easy but that we need to do so without adding divisions that can be avoided just makes sense to me.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Ok let's say a coal coloured person and a mountain tips in the Himalayas coloured person.

Ok, I urge all who read this to watch that video and especially the parts where the working class are shown. At that point you can make the decision for yourself of the footage and whether this poster is a liar or at the very least can be said to be a reliable reporter of an event.

The problem here is I have no respect for you. While it's obvious that you are intelligent I regard you as ethically immoral. While we have considerable political differences this is in principle due to your support of the Police during the rape scandals.

It isn't helped by your pin dancing, elitist near worship and...to my mind at least regular misleading statements to suit whatever position you wish to take. However, these latter reasons are dwarfed by the former.

As for how I describe you or what I say here, while I will consider reasonable requests (ie back up claims of lying) that's about it.

I consider this a lie.

The evidence is that I've never read anything from you that can be said to be socially conservative. I have little doubt that you care about your fiscal situation and that anything remotely connected to your wealth is strictly conservative.

However, that's no different to the far left running Google or Facebook.

Tell us, where do you differ from the far left on any social policies?

Edited by Stirlingsays (20 Feb 2021 2.47pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)