This explanation is still inexplicably passing off racism as banter.

It's also complete conjecture as to whether it was taken as 'banter' at the time or just taken without complaint after constant repetition. This is exactly how bullying works – first few times the victim tries to push back and gets abused or worse, eventually gives up and just accepts it to fit in and not cause any complaint. Further, I can quite easily understand why someone whose livelihood depends on a harmonious team dynamic would not necessarily raise a complaint immediately. People aren't all confident extroverts like, as weird as it is to write, you might appear to be. And even if it was taken as banter, it's still racist, agenda or not.

I'm also not taking any of this at face value, you appear to have skipped the part of my response where I clearly question his character as that is being reported but unsurprisingly not very widely. He may well be adding fuel to the fire for extra effect but ultimately have all the accusations of racism been denied? Has anyone seriously implicated mustered legal defence? Multiple defamation suits incoming? No and no.

Also bizarrely from someone who hates identity politics so much you're grouping together and negatively labelling all pakistanis as unworthy of employment based on one individual. I mean, really. I think you're a bit muddled.

Stump mics had better be closely monitored. Sledging isn’t meant to be complimentary.

If you got called all those names throughout your schooling no wonder you turned out as you did.

Again, call someone a p*ki on the field and it’s still not OK.

But Pommie ******* is fine.
Who knows what causes offence? Why should that upset someone more than being mocked for their physical appearance?