well Wisbech, when YOU accuse me of writing BS.....then i must bow to your superior expertise on such matters. Being the author of some of the most crashingly boring postings on HOL, you certainly are Kryptonite to some of our younger Eagles.

because HOL does not have an 'ignore' function, i scan all the threads for your name and never bother reading your boring drivel. I must conserve time to watch some paint-drying in my garage.

--------------------------

getting back to Russell Brand, on the one hand a victim of the WEF steamroller.....on the other hand a psychopath-randy druggy lefty egotistical cv.nt.

Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Not for the reasons you think, no. Certainly not for political reasons. No one cares about an old handsy guy with a Jesus complex. See what you want to see - if you think he’s more (or, frankly, anywhere near) of a threat than Robinson at his peak then you must be a few deep.

Overzealous MPs trying to score votes by looking like they have some shred of morality. For what it’s worth I agree its overreach, and pleasing to see Rumble and X refuse. They’re private entities and can do as they please.

Also Lanez is American, right? So not sure if the UK govt would be getting involved there.

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Of course they don't take action because they don't care, that's the whole point. They do care about Brand when he gets attacked by an entity that they politically respect precisely because it's political.

You just need to look at who owns Youtube and who owns Rumble and X to see why there are different responses in regards to free speech.

If Vanguard and/or Blackrock own shares in it then you can pretty much guarantee that company will be woke and adhere to their ESG investment and bahavourial standards.....Extremely WEF and very woke.

As Carlin stated where interests align behaviour aligns....it's not complicated.

Brand somewhat addresses this in his latest and maybe last YT upload. [Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Sep 2023 1.29am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Have to say Stirling I do often take umbrage at the usage of the phrases ‘left wing’ or ‘progressive’ as the group to which I think you are referring are anything but. Many operate under either the delusion or false guise of being left wing when they share more in common with fascists and also ‘progression’ can be made toward authoritarianism too, which is where they seem hellbent on heading.

I also find the claims of ‘conspiracy’ around the Brand commentary rather amusing, it is a very good way to try and demonise or negate anyone looking to expose you for conspiring as the word is so loaded these days. I felt it particularly amusing that one poster on here suggested everybody had been ‘groomed’ by Brand and the irony there! Cooking up conspiracies to suggest someone is promoting… conspiracies!

My personal feeling on Brand is that he is a weirdo who has been empowered to run riot, and almost certainly strayed into grey areas at best, by the media who are now hunting him down. It’s only common sense to question the timing of this and identify its correlation with him criticising the popular narrative which is promulgated by said media. I also think it’s very far from basement conspiracy to suggest Brand would not be the first or last person in history to have his past brought up to negate any threat he may pose through his channel (watched by millions btw which is not insignificant by any stretch of the imagination) and his very well known public persona. It’s been satirised through many a comedy sketch, cartoon and so forth given the obvious existence of such practice.

Brand has been asking some serious questions and made some poignant and potentially destabilising observations from the little I’ve seen. As to the truth in these I’m not well versed on all his suggestions but as ignorant on anyone else as to the veracity of them. I also believe even if not falling into the horrific stereotypes of ‘rape’, it’s entirely plausible to assume he has committed plenty of wrongdoing over time for which he could be in serious hot water. I highly doubt however a reasonable explanation will be given as to ‘why now?’ and again, whilst perhaps not reflective of reality, it does throw up questions separate to that he’s accused of.

If he needs to be locked up with key discarded I wouldn’t lose any sleep but why hadn’t his media accusers done this whilst he was literally in their employment? His guilt, and the possibility of a deliberate attack from the powers that be, are still very much possibilities as far as I’m concerned. If I thought I had something on a rapist I’d go to the police. I’d go to the police immediately. If I wanted to affect public opinion and thought, I’d create a highly emotive TV show.

Edited by Nicholas91 (23 Sep 2023 2.10am)

Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!!

I should think that anyone bothering to read all of Wisbelch's diarrhetic wafflings would be slowly rendered unconscious, in the way a faulty gas appliance could.

Nonce!

(I'm even older than my wife )