Carole Cadwalladr
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In | RSS Feed
 beak  croydon 10 Nov 23 9.42am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
For those who are ok with slander and libel as long as it supports their view. Generally slander and libel involves two parties who may or may not seek reparation through the courts. I am not a rubber necker who enjoys such spectacles from the side lines, an unedifying event. Edited by beak (10 Nov 2023 10.45am)
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Badger11  Beckenham 10 Nov 23 9.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by beak
Generally slander and libel involves two parties who may or may not seek reparation through the courts. I am not a rubber necker who enjoys such spectacles from the side lines an unedifying event. Agreed. Most times even the winner does not come out unscathed. I see De Niro has just lost a case with a lot of muck raking he might have been better advised to have settled. Edited by Badger11 (10 Nov 2023 9.44am)
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Teddy Eagle  10 Nov 23 11.27am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
My friend who told me this worked for the Mail, who are restricted just as everyone is. This isn’t about the way newspapers spin stories, decide not to publish some, publish only parts of others or cover issues thought inconsequential by others. How do you know that?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
HKOwen  Hong Kong 10 Nov 23 11.28am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by beak
Generally slander and libel involves two parties who may or may not seek reparation through the courts. I am not a rubber necker who enjoys such spectacles from the side lines, an unedifying event. Edited by beak (10 Nov 2023 10.45am) Thanks for the laugh from your lofty position there. The two parties are the plaintiff(s) and the defendant(s). Any payments following judgement are known as general damages. Please don't chime in when the adults are talking * bold highlight indicates nonsense
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| HKOwen Hong Kong 10 Nov 23 11.30am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
How do you know that? Of course he doesn't. It's standard post of " look at me, I know important journalists who know secret stuff so by association I am important" Unsubstantiated nonsense.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| beak croydon 10 Nov 23 12.18pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Thanks for the laugh from your lofty position there. The two parties are the plaintiff(s) and the defendant(s). Any payments following judgement are known as general damages. Please don't chime in when the adults are talking * bold highlight indicates nonsense Oh ! So, you are barring me from HOL! I didn't realise that you are a board moderator,hard to tell from your heavily confrontational tone.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 23 2.11pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
How do you know that? About the Mail having to sit on stories? Because I was told so by my friend who worked there and he is someone I trust.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 23 2.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by HKOwen
Of course he doesn't. It's standard post of " look at me, I know important journalists who know secret stuff so by association I am important" Unsubstantiated nonsense. My friend was not an “important” journalist. He was a sub editor who rewrote raw copy to fit the space allocated and was in the approved style. He had worked in the industry since Uni, so knew what happened.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Teddy Eagle 10 Nov 23 2.23pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
About the Mail having to sit on stories? Because I was told so by my friend who worked there and he is someone I trust. Every newspaper would be exactly the same. Except when they publish anyway and get successfully sued.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 10 Nov 23 2.34pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Every newspaper would be exactly the same. Except when they publish anyway and get successfully sued. Journalists who worked for the Daily Mirror and had stories about Robert Maxwell would regularly pass them on to colleagues at other newspapers or to Private Eye. If anyone at the Daily Mail (for example) had a good story that the paper refused to publish they could always pass it on to the Guardian. Mostly journalists complain because the editor or the lawyers will tell them that rumour is not enough.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 23 4.42pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
Every newspaper would be exactly the same. Except when they publish anyway and get successfully sued. What they decide to publish anyway will certainly vary depending on the way each leans.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 10 Nov 23 4.45pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Badger11
Journalists who worked for the Daily Mirror and had stories about Robert Maxwell would regularly pass them on to colleagues at other newspapers or to Private Eye. If anyone at the Daily Mail (for example) had a good story that the paper refused to publish they could always pass it on to the Guardian. Mostly journalists complain because the editor or the lawyers will tell them that rumour is not enough. The lawyers rule the roost in most. Especially in places which need to stay profitable to survive and aren’t funded by a politically motivated billionaire.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / Register
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2023 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.