You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Forest
April 14 2024 2.27am

Forest

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 9 of 10 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

 

View est1905's Profile est1905 Flag 22 Mar 24 5.39pm Send a Private Message to est1905 Add est1905 as a friend

Originally posted by Sansbup

In my view, all judgements in these cases should be applied in the summer before the next season. So either they relegate a team, or deduct points this should be applied to the coming season before it starts. No mid-season points deductions.

This would be much fairer for everyone.


How would it be fairer on Luton who may go dow THIS season and have abided by the rules. The Premier league clubs unanimously voted for punishment in the same season a club is found guilty so its a done deal. Everton, Forest and Everton again to be punished before the end of the season.
Leicester are currently out of the Prem's juristiction (them being in the Championship) but they will be handed a points deduction the minute they are promoted too. And rightly so. Maybe if clubs now know a sanction will 100% be coming their way they might stop spending money they are not allowed to spend.
I'm actually in agreement that owners should be allowed to spend over the threshold if they front and guarantee all costs themselves but until the rules are changed they need to abide by them

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View pssguy's Profile pssguy Flag 22 Mar 24 5.55pm Send a Private Message to pssguy Add pssguy as a friend

Make it a criminal offence with the Chairman taking the rap. Apply Texas border sanctions viz. 6 months in the clink for first offence , 10 years for second. That should sort it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View HKOwen's Profile HKOwen Online Flag Hong Kong 25 Mar 24 10.44pm Send a Private Message to HKOwen Add HKOwen as a friend

Originally posted by Davepalace707

They will only have lost if they get relegated this season. One of them won’t be and there’s a chance neither will be. They both overspent last season and stayed up by four or fewer points. You could argue they’ve already won as without spending they’d have been relegated. Four or six point deductions is not an adequate deterrent and other teams will gamble on spending to stay up.

Fair point, but what do you do? Make the penalty relegation?
It's never going to be solved in a way that pleases everyone

 


Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Mar 24 6.49am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Forest have appealed their points deduction. Bearing in mind that they were let off 2 points for co-operating I hope the appeal takes back those 2 points for not accepting the verdict.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dubai Eagle's Profile Dubai Eagle Flag 26 Mar 24 6.50am Send a Private Message to Dubai Eagle Add Dubai Eagle as a friend

Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation =
4 points penalty.

I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way-

It will be interesting to see the outcome.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Badger11's Profile Badger11 Flag Beckenham 26 Mar 24 6.50am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation =
4 points penalty.

I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way-

It will be interesting to see the outcome.

Beat me to it although I think your post is better.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dubai Eagle's Profile Dubai Eagle Flag 26 Mar 24 6.51am Send a Private Message to Dubai Eagle Add Dubai Eagle as a friend

Clearly we were typing at the same time, lol

Originally posted by Badger11

Forest have appealed their points deduction. Bearing in mind that they were let off 2 points for co-operating I hope the appeal takes back those 2 points for not accepting the verdict.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Dubai Eagle's Profile Dubai Eagle Flag 26 Mar 24 6.58am Send a Private Message to Dubai Eagle Add Dubai Eagle as a friend

Maybe they are going to argue that Forest & Everton are being treated differently to Man City ? & there should be a commonality of how each case is viewed / treated & judged including timelines (in that respect I think most reasonable even minded people would probably agree)

I read that the Man City hearing dates have been agreed but its not been made public & its not going to be until 2025 (presumably thats one of the reasons why its not been made public, because for sure its not a level playing field for everyone else)


Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation =
4 points penalty.

I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way-

It will be interesting to see the outcome.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View doombear's Profile doombear Flag Too far from Selhurst Park 26 Mar 24 8.13am Send a Private Message to doombear Add doombear as a friend

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation =
4 points penalty.

I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way-

It will be interesting to see the outcome.


Indeed. They seem to want to argue over the lack of fairness in the system for clubs such as them who haven't had the recent benefit of parachute payments etc. Like Badger, I do hope Forest have the 2 points originally given back to them for co-operation withdrawn. I think clubs have to see that there is a jeopardy in going to appeal on spurious grounds (if that is, indeed, what is happening here).

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Willo's Profile Willo Flag South coast - west of Brighton. 26 Mar 24 8.29am Send a Private Message to Willo Add Willo as a friend

[Link]

A grin of rapt adoration fell on my face on perusing the comments by Darragh MacAnthony and I agree with the general thrust of his preferred solution.I found myself nodding like a donkey.


Edited by Willo (26 Mar 2024 8.39am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dreamwaverider's Profile dreamwaverider Flag London 26 Mar 24 8.48am Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

Originally posted by Dubai Eagle

Surprised to read that they are appealing against the 4 point deduction - I kind of understood it as a 3 point deduction for falling foul of the regulations, plus 3 points for the value of the overspend (£34.5 million) reduced by 2 points for co operation =
4 points penalty.

I cant believe that they have found new evidence in such a short period of time so they must be arguing that the original process / outcome was flawed in some way-

It will be interesting to see the outcome.

Well they just threw that out the window.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View dreamwaverider's Profile dreamwaverider Flag London 26 Mar 24 8.52am Send a Private Message to dreamwaverider Add dreamwaverider as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

[Link]

A grin of rapt adoration fell on my face on perusing the comments by Darragh MacAnthony and I agree with the general thrust of his preferred solution.I found myself nodding like a donkey.


Edited by Willo (26 Mar 2024 8.39am)

Quality idea.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 9 of 10 < 5 6 7 8 9 10 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Forest