You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Centenary of Russian Revolution
April 28 2024 9.48pm

Centenary of Russian Revolution

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

 

View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 17 8.24am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by leifandersonshair

Suggesting it was the fault of the communists that Hitler came to power is completely ridiculous though.

Really? Explain.

I question you know of Hitler's writings, I bet you haven't read any.

Without the USSR is it questionable that you would have seen Hitler.....They were by no means the only input....The 'stab in the back' Jewish myth for losing WW1 and the economic disaster for Germany after WW1....But the other input was communist uprisings coming from the Russian revolution.

If you took away the Bolsheviks, you took away fifty percent of what made Hitler.....well perhaps the percentage can be argued about for higher or lower but the denial of the influence is a denial of reality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Nov 2017 8.31am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Mr_Gristle's Profile Mr_Gristle Flag In the land of Whelk Eaters 10 Nov 17 8.37am Send a Private Message to Mr_Gristle Add Mr_Gristle as a friend

Originally posted by steeleye20

The USSR had many fine achievements that could not even be dreamed of in Tzarist Russia.

[Link]

Take a while to see them and understand better.

Many Russian and Eastern Europpean people are fed up with capitalism and wish they were 'back in the USSR'.

By 1937 at the time of the 'evil dictatorship' of Stalin the Russian people became fully literate, before the revolution only 20% of men and 13% of women could read or write.

They also had free health care and education, no crime, no famine as happened frequently in tzarist Russia, and a nearly doubled life expectancy.

From being slaves for centuries before the revolution that is some achievement.

The first 'gulag' was not built by Lenin but by the British Army who invaded Russia at Archangel and built a concentration camp on 'Death Island' nearby.

That effort to sabotage the revolution failed and we have never understood the revolution or the reasons for it.

You have to understand the situation of the Russian people at that time to see why there was a revolution.

Whatever purges tragedies murder and mayhem occurred
the soviet era transformed a mediaeval backward country into a modern industrial society which produced its most telling scientific achievement the winning of the space race.

Without the USSR we would probably not even be here, the Red Army faced 200 divisions of nazi invaders, we faced no more than 50 in the entire WW2.

Oh but it's true the average Russian did not have a mobile phone in the soviet era, how appalling.

So much more to relate but space is short.

A bit of a mixed bag post in my humble, but I make you right about the industrial transformation of what was pretty much a third world-style subsistence economy with a layer of feudalism and ultra-wealthy royalty on top.

Your point about WW2 and the role of the Red Army (and the exceptionally harsh winter of 1941, lest we forget) is unarguable. German victory in the East in 1941 or 42 means no Overlord, likely defeat in North Africa, no invasion of Italy and perhaps a sitzkreig until either side got nuclear weapons or an armistice was agreed.

A democratic Russia in WW2 simply wouldn't have been able to have the same casual disregard for life that essential kept the Soviets in the game until they were able to leverage their overwhelming industrial capacity and adoption of new tactics afforded by that preponderance.

 


Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
hedgehog50 Flag Croydon 10 Nov 17 9.08am

Originally posted by Mr_Gristle

A bit of a mixed bag post in my humble, but I make you right about the industrial transformation of what was pretty much a third world-style subsistence economy with a layer of feudalism and ultra-wealthy royalty on top.

Your point about WW2 and the role of the Red Army (and the exceptionally harsh winter of 1941, lest we forget) is unarguable. German victory in the East in 1941 or 42 means no Overlord, likely defeat in North Africa, no invasion of Italy and perhaps a sitzkreig until either side got nuclear weapons or an armistice was agreed.

A democratic Russia in WW2 simply wouldn't have been able to have the same casual disregard for life that essential kept the Soviets in the game until they were able to leverage their overwhelming industrial capacity and adoption of new tactics afforded by that preponderance.

Russia would have industrialised anyway under a democratic government. The Germans would not have made such inroads into Russia if Stalin had not purged the army of its best officers. Because of his disgraceful pact with Hitler, he was also slow in reacting when the Germans invaded. Initially, some areas of Western Russia treated the German invasion as a liberation from the communist heel (wrong of course - just a new heel coming in). Stalin's direction of the war was disastrous and they only started reversing things when he began listening and accepting his generals' advice rather than killing them. The real turning point in World War II was the USA entering it.

Edited by hedgehog50 (10 Nov 2017 9.13am)

 


We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 10 Nov 17 9.42am

Arguably,the "turning point" was the decision made by Hitler to declare war on the USA following Pearl Harbour

But regardless of Stalin etc,the contribution of the USSR (which did most of the hard fighting and suffered the most) in wearing down and driving back the Nazis 1942-45 was massive.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Nov 17 10.26am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

So...Tristan De Cunha. Interesting.

For those that believe the equality/socialist type model can't work:

"The island's unique social and economic organisation has evolved over the years, but is based on the principles set out by William Glass in 1817, when he established a settlement based on equality. All Tristan families are farmers, owning their own stock and/or fishing. All land is communally owned. All households have plots of land at The Patches on which they grow potatoes. Livestock numbers are strictly controlled to conserve pasture and to prevent better-off families from accumulating wealth. "

Been like this for 200 years now.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 17 10.52am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

So...Tristan De Cunha. Interesting.

For those that believe the equality/socialist type model can't work:

"The island's unique social and economic organisation has evolved over the years, but is based on the principles set out by William Glass in 1817, when he established a settlement based on equality. All Tristan families are farmers, owning their own stock and/or fishing. All land is communally owned. All households have plots of land at The Patches on which they grow potatoes. Livestock numbers are strictly controlled to conserve pasture and to prevent better-off families from accumulating wealth. "

Been like this for 200 years now.

This isn't an example of socialism working....very very selective view of that island with 293 people on it.

So a bunch of farmers with supporting business, who have financial issues are an example for socialism?

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 17 11.01am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by legaleagle

Arguably,the "turning point" was the decision made by Hitler to declare war on the USA following Pearl Harbour

But regardless of Stalin etc,the contribution of the USSR (which did most of the hard fighting and suffered the most) in wearing down and driving back the Nazis 1942-45 was massive.

The contribution of the USSR? It's true that the decision to invade the USSR and fight on two fronts ultimately settled the war in the allies favour....though it was a close run thing....but this was a case of the 'enemies of our enemies are our friends'.

The USSR only fought Hitler because he turned on them.....like he always said he would back in the twenties.

This the same USSR who had a pack with Hitler called the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact which included a secret protocol that divided territories of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland, and Romania, into German and Soviet "spheres of influence".

The same Soviets who, under that pack, invaded Poland with Germany.

The same Soviets who continued in Poland and other European countries for decades after the war...only leaving due to economic near collapse.

Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Nov 2017 11.09am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Nov 17 11.03am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

This isn't an example of socialism working....very very selective view of that island with 293 people on it.

So a bunch of farmers with supporting business, who have financial issues are an example for socialism?

Seems pretty clear that the model has its roots from the origins of socialism and i am not talking about Marx who wasn't even born when the original policy document for the islands was drawn up.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 17 11.08am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

Seems pretty clear that the model has its roots from the origins of socialism and i am not talking about Marx who wasn't even born when the original policy document for the islands was drawn up.

The point Kermy is that the island isn't particularly successful or socialist.

Socialism exists within the system just as socialism exists within our system here......as seen in the NHS, social housing, welfare and education systems.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 10 Nov 17 11.11am

Originally posted by hedgehog50

Russia would have industrialised anyway under a democratic government. The Germans would not have made such inroads into Russia if Stalin had not purged the army of its best officers. Because of his disgraceful pact with Hitler, he was also slow in reacting when the Germans invaded. Initially, some areas of Western Russia treated the German invasion as a liberation from the communist heel (wrong of course - just a new heel coming in). Stalin's direction of the war was disastrous and they only started reversing things when he began listening and accepting his generals' advice rather than killing them. The real turning point in World War II was the USA entering it.

Edited by hedgehog50 (10 Nov 2017 9.13am)

Definitely true, the equipment provided to Russia across the Alaskan straights was vital to the Red Army counter-attack at Moscow, and then later Stalingrad.

That said, the German invasion of Russia pretty much sealed the fate of the German Military, as it tied up their resources and manpower in a brutal meatgrinder of a conflict. Had the Germans not invaded Russia, the UK and US would probably have failed at Normandy (or not been able to launch the Normandy invasions in France).

More worrying though, would have been what would have happened if the US hadn't entered the war. Like outcome would have been the iron curtain would have extended at least as far as Spain on the European mainland (and likely the Soviets would have just rolled through France into Spain and Portugal, and likely the Scandinavian countries). That would have been a terrible situation for the UK to be in (as well as the rest of Europe).

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
View Kermit8's Profile Kermit8 Flag Hevon 10 Nov 17 11.12am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The point Kermy is that the island isn't particularly successful or socialist.

Socialism exists within the system just as socialism exists within our system here......as seen in the NHS, social housing, welfare and education systems.

I get that but they do successfully operate a policy of equality which the islanders themselves give the thumbs up too still 200 years down the line. And when you say the islands themselves aren't '"successful" what parameters are you using? Where is the failure? The native bunch I saw on BBC this morning seemed very positive in general about the place.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
View Stirlingsays's Profile Stirlingsays Flag 10 Nov 17 11.18am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Kermit8

I get that but they do successfully operate a policy of equality which the islanders themselves give the thumbs up too still 200 years down the line. And when you say the islands themselves aren't '"successful" what parameters are you using? Where is the failure? The native bunch I saw on BBC this morning seemed very positive in general about the place.

I'd say the economy of the island, which apparently isn't great. Outdated infrastructure abounds.

Also, you are picking on one aspect of the island when in reality it isn't much of a socialist run place anyway.

Of course those who own stuff are happy.....That's the case in all political systems.

Like I say, we have far more socialism here than they do. But I'll stop waffling with this point here because it sounds like I'm attacking you for the hell of it and I'm not.


Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Nov 2017 11.23am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

 

Page 3 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Centenary of Russian Revolution