US politics

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 584 of 626 < 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 >

Teddy Eagle 15 Mar 24 1.16pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle If he stands. Then anything could happen. I sense a significant number who yearn for a younger , dynamic alternative and not a choice between two older men who both are tainted. I'm sure they do but not necessarily Newsom. The thing is if not him then who? Maybe they have some super-candidate waiting in the wings although who that might be is a mystery. Politics is in a sorry state.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

15 Mar 24 1.16pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

If he stands.

Then anything could happen. I sense a significant number who yearn for a younger , dynamic alternative and not a choice between two older men who both are tainted.

I'm sure they do but not necessarily Newsom. The thing is if not him then who? Maybe they have some super-candidate waiting in the wings although who that might be is a mystery.
Politics is in a sorry state.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Mar 24 2.05pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle So from this I assume you are opposed to the USA supporting the NATO alliance in its assistance of Ukraine and sanctions on Russia? High fuel prices are a direct consequence of this. Not decisions by local politicians. That they may have also decided to try to contain consumption also flows from that war. No, I'm not opposed to helping Ukraine. But I am opposed to them trying to corner the market, embolden Arab states whilst backing Israel and blowing up pipelines. Helping Ukraine could have been done differently quite easily. But the Democrat policy is to enrich their mates whilst literally killing people or letting people die; all whilst their whining virtue signalling continues. The hypocrisy is off the scale. I am starting to wonder, however, how close to a negotiated settlement Ukraine are getting. One which will probably recognise everything Russia wanted in the first place. Then what will the point of this be? The deaths will all become totally meaningless. I doubt I'm the only one thinking it. How is Biden's foreign policy doing in your opinion? Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 15 Mar 24 2.05pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

So from this I assume you are opposed to the USA supporting the NATO alliance in its assistance of Ukraine and sanctions on Russia?

High fuel prices are a direct consequence of this. Not decisions by local politicians. That they may have also decided to try to contain consumption also flows from that war.

No, I'm not opposed to helping Ukraine. But I am opposed to them trying to corner the market, embolden Arab states whilst backing Israel and blowing up pipelines. Helping Ukraine could have been done differently quite easily. But the Democrat policy is to enrich their mates whilst literally killing people or letting people die; all whilst their whining virtue signalling continues. The hypocrisy is off the scale.
I am starting to wonder, however, how close to a negotiated settlement Ukraine are getting. One which will probably recognise everything Russia wanted in the first place. Then what will the point of this be? The deaths will all become totally meaningless. I doubt I'm the only one thinking it.
How is Biden's foreign policy doing in your opinion?

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen Hong Kong 15 Mar 24 2.18pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Responsibility maybe moot but Newsom's policies certainly haven't helped and are unlikely to appeal in a Presidential election. I'd defer to posters who live in America. Now hold on, are you seriously suggesting that the poster knows less than someone who actually lives in the USA, outrageous. Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.
Alert a moderator to this post

HKOwen

Hong Kong 15 Mar 24 2.18pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Responsibility maybe moot but Newsom's policies certainly haven't helped and are unlikely to appeal in a Presidential election.
I'd defer to posters who live in America.

Now hold on, are you seriously suggesting that the poster knows less than someone who actually lives in the USA, outrageous.

Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance.

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 24 4.17pm
Originally posted by HKOwen Now hold on, are you seriously suggesting that the poster knows less than someone who actually lives in the USA, outrageous. For the avoidance of doubt and to assist the Prince of cynicism, so do I when it relates to how people there are thinking and acting. That’s not to say that a wider perspective cannot sometimes see things that those embroiled in the mess don’t. To see a wall it’s best not to stand too close to it. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online

Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 24 4.17pm

Originally posted by HKOwen

Now hold on, are you seriously suggesting that the poster knows less than someone who actually lives in the USA, outrageous.

For the avoidance of doubt and to assist the Prince of cynicism, so do I when it relates to how people there are thinking and acting.

That’s not to say that a wider perspective cannot sometimes see things that those embroiled in the mess don’t. To see a wall it’s best not to stand too close to it.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 15 Mar 24 4.27pm
The cultural messaging taught to young woman....which let's be frank is feminism and social liberalism....is destroying lives in real time. There is a complete lack of common sense and reality. A socially conservative female reviews a viral clip of young women asked the simple question, 'do you need men?' [Link] Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Mar 2024 4.42pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

15 Mar 24 4.27pm

The cultural messaging taught to young woman....which let's be frank is feminism and social liberalism....is destroying lives in real time.

There is a complete lack of common sense and reality.

A socially conservative female reviews a viral clip of young women asked the simple question, 'do you need men?'

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (15 Mar 2024 4.42pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 24 8.25pm
Originally posted by ASCPFC No, I'm not opposed to helping Ukraine. But I am opposed to them trying to corner the market, embolden Arab states whilst backing Israel and blowing up pipelines. Helping Ukraine could have been done differently quite easily. But the Democrat policy is to enrich their mates whilst literally killing people or letting people die; all whilst their whining virtue signalling continues. The hypocrisy is off the scale. I am starting to wonder, however, how close to a negotiated settlement Ukraine are getting. One which will probably recognise everything Russia wanted in the first place. Then what will the point of this be? The deaths will all become totally meaningless. I doubt I'm the only one thinking it. How is Biden's foreign policy doing in your opinion? Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign. Where do you get the idea that Democratic foreign policy is to enrich their mates whilst killing people? It’s nothing of the sort. It started with rebuilding the NATO alliance that was threatened by Trump and rejoining the Paris accord on climate change which Trump abandoned. I won’t link the official statements but the one from Wiki serves to show that nothing you claim is actually there:- [Link] The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey. Whilst the Jewish lobby is undoubtedly strong in the USA , Biden’s lack of trust in Netanyahu is very obvious. For sure they abhor the attack by Hamas and defend the right of Israel to respond but they are also openly critical of the over-reaction and very concerned about the loss of life and threat of disease and starvation . I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point? Firstly, because you cannot trust Putin. If you gave him what he wanted at the beginning he, with his resources undiminished, would not have stopped there. For a token period perhaps but that’s all. Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust. Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine. Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches., For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online

Truro Cornwall 15 Mar 24 8.25pm

Originally posted by ASCPFC

Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign.

Where do you get the idea that Democratic foreign policy is to enrich their mates whilst killing people? It’s nothing of the sort. It started with rebuilding the NATO alliance that was threatened by Trump and rejoining the Paris accord on climate change which Trump abandoned. I won’t link the official statements but the one from Wiki serves to show that nothing you claim is actually there:-

[Link]

The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey.

Whilst the Jewish lobby is undoubtedly strong in the USA , Biden’s lack of trust in Netanyahu is very obvious. For sure they abhor the attack by Hamas and defend the right of Israel to respond but they are also openly critical of the over-reaction and very concerned about the loss of life and threat of disease and starvation .

I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point?

Firstly, because you cannot trust Putin. If you gave him what he wanted at the beginning he, with his resources undiminished, would not have stopped there. For a token period perhaps but that’s all.

Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust.

Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine.

Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches.,

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 15 Mar 24 10.25pm
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign. Where do you get the idea that Democratic foreign policy is to enrich their mates whilst killing people? It’s nothing of the sort. It started with rebuilding the NATO alliance that was threatened by Trump and rejoining the Paris accord on climate change which Trump abandoned. I won’t link the official statements but the one from Wiki serves to show that nothing you claim is actually there:- [Link] The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey. Whilst the Jewish lobby is undoubtedly strong in the USA , Biden’s lack of trust in Netanyahu is very obvious. For sure they abhor the attack by Hamas and defend the right of Israel to respond but they are also openly critical of the over-reaction and very concerned about the loss of life and threat of disease and starvation . I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point? Firstly, because you cannot trust Putin. If you gave him what he wanted at the beginning he, with his resources undiminished, would not have stopped there. For a token period perhaps but that’s all. Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust. Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine. Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches., Not necessarily weaker. [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

15 Mar 24 10.25pm

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign.

[Link]

The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey.

I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point?

Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust.

Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine.

Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches.,

Not necessarily weaker.

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 24 7.39am
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle Not necessarily weaker. [Link] Ok, but it’s one man’s view on a specific aspect. I am not sure it is widely shared and covers all aspects. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online

Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 24 7.39am

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Not necessarily weaker.

[Link]

Ok, but it’s one man’s view on a specific aspect. I am not sure it is widely shared and covers all aspects.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 16 Mar 24 11.15am
The level of delusion is off the charts. Hundreds of thousands of people die because we apparently want to delay Russia for a couple of years....even though we could have done that in the agreement Johnson vetoed....all this did was strengthen the global south and turn them into a stronger enemy which again, we apparently have to fight....after already spending 12 billion we won't get back and giving a good number of our best tanks away. So now we have to economically support Ukraine, who aren't even in nato, for a whole generation....because Putin bad. The most avoidable and stupid war in my lifetime. Now the usual suspects are bringing out all the lies about the reds coming over the hills unless we do A and suffer B.....fear mongering for lambs being led to mostly more economic decline. The fact that I have to also suffer economically long term for the decisions of morons whose idiocy I never supported boils my blood. A war that only has downsides.....I won't say that I think should happen to the people who carried on digging this hole, even when it was obvious it wasn't working. At least I pointed this out near the start. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Mar 2024 11.34am) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

16 Mar 24 11.15am

The level of delusion is off the charts.

Hundreds of thousands of people die because we apparently want to delay Russia for a couple of years....even though we could have done that in the agreement Johnson vetoed....all this did was strengthen the global south and turn them into a stronger enemy which again, we apparently have to fight....after already spending 12 billion we won't get back and giving a good number of our best tanks away.

So now we have to economically support Ukraine, who aren't even in nato, for a whole generation....because Putin bad.

The most avoidable and stupid war in my lifetime.

Now the usual suspects are bringing out all the lies about the reds coming over the hills unless we do A and suffer B.....fear mongering for lambs being led to mostly more economic decline.

The fact that I have to also suffer economically long term for the decisions of morons whose idiocy I never supported boils my blood.

A war that only has downsides.....I won't say that I think should happen to the people who carried on digging this hole, even when it was obvious it wasn't working.

At least I pointed this out near the start.

Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Mar 2024 11.34am)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle 16 Mar 24 11.35am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Ok, but it’s one man’s view on a specific aspect. I am not sure it is widely shared and covers all aspects. That one man is the defense policy director of Lithuania's defense ministry so he might have a clue about that part of the world.
Alert a moderator to this post

Teddy Eagle

16 Mar 24 11.35am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Ok, but it’s one man’s view on a specific aspect. I am not sure it is widely shared and covers all aspects.

That one man is the defense policy director of Lithuania's defense ministry so he might have a clue about that part of the world.

Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Mar 24 11.48am
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign. Where do you get the idea that Democratic foreign policy is to enrich their mates whilst killing people? It’s nothing of the sort. It started with rebuilding the NATO alliance that was threatened by Trump and rejoining the Paris accord on climate change which Trump abandoned. I won’t link the official statements but the one from Wiki serves to show that nothing you claim is actually there:- [Link] The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey. Whilst the Jewish lobby is undoubtedly strong in the USA , Biden’s lack of trust in Netanyahu is very obvious. For sure they abhor the attack by Hamas and defend the right of Israel to respond but they are also openly critical of the over-reaction and very concerned about the loss of life and threat of disease and starvation . I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point? Firstly, because you cannot trust Putin. If you gave him what he wanted at the beginning he, with his resources undiminished, would not have stopped there. For a token period perhaps but that’s all. Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust. Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine. Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches., The Democrat voters don't agree with Biden's foreign policy. It's been all wars - poorly fought and poorly thought out - with no actual gains and a lot of collateral damage. Afghanistan - enough said. Ukraine - the aid packages are not going through properly. Equipment is not arriving when needed. It's half-arsed at best. Israel - did not require an aid package but got it anyway. Everyone knows why - as even you mention. What next? The mind boggles frankly. Let's sum up Biden's foreign policy in one word: failed. His own supporters label it as genocidal. Red and Blue Army!
Alert a moderator to this post

ASCPFC

Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 16 Mar 24 11.48am

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Your responses puzzle me. Some are reasonable and easy to agree with whilst others, as above, appear to be written by a scriptwriter for the Trump campaign.

[Link]

The relationship with the oil and gas industry has been pragmatic since Russia’s adventure in Ukraine. It’s certainly not matey.

I too expect a settlement in Ukraine quite soon and also expect it to resemble Putin’s original demands. So what has been the point?

Secondly, because he has lost many people and lots of equipment, his position becomes weaker. He has also lost markets and trust.

Russia getting what it asked for 3 years ago would have been stronger and emboldened. They could be in Moldova by now, having taken all of Ukraine.

Russia getting what it asked for now is weaker and likely to cause Putin some headaches.,

The Democrat voters don't agree with Biden's foreign policy. It's been all wars - poorly fought and poorly thought out - with no actual gains and a lot of collateral damage.

Afghanistan - enough said.
Ukraine - the aid packages are not going through properly. Equipment is not arriving when needed. It's half-arsed at best.
Israel - did not require an aid package but got it anyway. Everyone knows why - as even you mention.
What next? The mind boggles frankly.

Let's sum up Biden's foreign policy in one word: failed.
His own supporters label it as genocidal.

Red and Blue Army!

Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 24 1.40pm
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle That one man is the defense policy director of Lithuania's defense ministry so he might have a clue about that part of the world. I have no doubt his opinion is listened to. Along with all the others. For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.
Alert a moderator to this post

Wisbech Eagle Online

Truro Cornwall 16 Mar 24 1.40pm

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

That one man is the defense policy director of Lithuania's defense ministry so he might have a clue about that part of the world.

I have no doubt his opinion is listened to. Along with all the others.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 584 of 626 < 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

US politics

Site Map

Sponsors