This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
The Roy Out thread hasn't run out of steam I see..
|
|
| BlueJay |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Poch is looking for a job.
|
|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
The Roy Out thread hasn't run out of steam I see.. One can predict with a high degree of certainty the topic of debate if we lose against Fulham on the back of yet another turgid display. Edited by Willo (20 Oct 2020 8.22am)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
One can predict with a high degree of certainty the topic of debate if we lose against Fulham on the back of yet another turgid display. Edited by Willo (20 Oct 2020 8.22am) Yes quite, this game will most definitely do and be something ..otherwise
|
|
|
Originally posted by doombear
Roy has complained about our conversion rate of chances. Batshuayi is the man who can improve that and I would hope Roy can see that. Spot on. He got absolutely no service but the 2 decent balls that came his way, he won a peno and scored what would have been an absolute cracker if he had of ran a mili second later. He has to start from now on.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Frickin Saweet
a couple of thoughts that are tottering around in my head. Is there a massive disconnect between Dougie and Roy? A lot of technically and/or naturally talented players that Dougie finds are not being used to get the best out of them. Is there any point in trying to get talented players in if Roy wants statues that can hold a shape for 90-minutes? If Dougie succumbs to that then we really are institutionally accepting his style at Palace. I'd imagine this would cause friction if Dougie is sourcing decent players only for them to be shackled. Secondly, did Parish think he could get away with another season serving up dross football via Roy because the stadium would be empty every week? What's a few threads on here and a bit of critique from pundits, compared to tens of thousands of fans booing the team off? Much easier to deal with the former and keep yer head down. My personal view is that Hodgson delivers for Parish in that he keeps the club in the PL on a shoestring, in the meantime us supporters are 'short-changed' by having to witness total and utter dross game, on game.As far as the club are concerned the end justifies the means. I suspect that if Hodgson keeps us in the PL this season and wants to continue for another year the club will be only too glad to extend his contract.
|
|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
The Roy Out thread hasn't run out of steam I see.. Unlike our attacking threat
|
|
|
Originally posted by Painter
Just watched Burnley v West Brom a turgid boring game, why people are calling for Dyche is a mystery, he plays exactly the same style as Roy. What Chairman is going to sack a mid table manager, who ensured stability for 3 years? Here, here. people want to go more attack minded, but then want Dyche in? i'd rather stick with Roy, Thanks. Dyche is a sideways pass, when we need a throughball.
"It was a Team effort, I guess it took all players working together to lose this one" |
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
My personal view is that Hodgson delivers for Parish in that he keeps the club in the PL on a shoestring, in the meantime us supporters are 'short-changed' by having to witness total and utter dross game, on game.As far as the club are concerned the end justifies the means. I suspect that if Hodgson keeps us in the PL this season and wants to continue for another year the club will be only too glad to extend his contract. I agree. Most people seem to think Roy will go next summer, I’m not so sure if we survive
|
|
|
Originally posted by Willo
My personal view is that Hodgson delivers for Parish in that he keeps the club in the PL on a shoestring, in the meantime us supporters are 'short-changed' by having to witness total and utter dross game, on game.As far as the club are concerned the end justifies the means. I suspect that if Hodgson keeps us in the PL this season and wants to continue for another year the club will be only too glad to extend his contract. This extreme negative approach will not help build any future legacy at the club - no potential fan is going to watch a team that rarely has a pop on goal, let alone enticing any decent attack minded players. Hodgson will be gone soon enough, hopefully we won't be relegated by then.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
Here, here. people want to go more attack minded, but then want Dyche in? i'd rather stick with Roy, Thanks. Dyche is a sideways pass, when we need a throughball. One thing for Dyche though. Surely he would shout at the players and say it outright to the press that our performance was shyte. Sick of hearing 'we were good defensively until they scored...'
Red and Blue Army! |
|
|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
This extreme negative approach will not help build any future legacy at the club - no potential fan is going to watch a team that rarely has a pop on goal, let alone enticing any decent attack minded players. Hodgson will be gone soon enough, hopefully we won't be relegated by then. There is also a tipping point when something becomes untenable. It's usual for the fans to reach that point before the powers that be, as they are looking at things through a different lens. However, as some point the growing utterings will become a noise that Parish can no longer ignore or block out. I expect we'll reach that point during the season and hope Parish will be working on a replacement to come in at the end of the season, assuming we can limp over the finish line once more. There comes a time in this season where it's risky to change the manager in case it upsets our depressing-yet-effective points tally.
|
|
|
Originally posted by southnorwoodhill
This extreme negative approach will not help build any future legacy at the club - no potential fan is going to watch a team that rarely has a pop on goal, let alone enticing any decent attack minded players. Hodgson will be gone soon enough, hopefully we won't be relegated by then. We spend 78% of our turnover on wages.There are ageing players with hardly any or no resale value. We are not a club willing to back the manager in the transfer market - Our Net Spend over the last 4 seasons has been some £10 Mill.
|
|
|
Originally posted by CrazyBadger
Here, here. people want to go more attack minded, but then want Dyche in? i'd rather stick with Roy, Thanks. Dyche is a sideways pass, when we need a throughball. Dyche is unarguably more attack minded than Roy - he’s just direct. Their approach is about getting balls into the box, and invariably these leads to chances and goals. They’re also far more dangerous from set pieces. If you can find it have a look at the thread from when they beat us at Selhurst last year.. they played us off the park. They also have a vastly inferior squad to us on paper.
|
|
| jeeagles |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by EddieMac
Spot on. He got absolutely no service but the 2 decent balls that came his way, he won a peno and scored what would have been an absolute cracker if he had of ran a mili second later. He has to start from now on. In the freeze frame, the ball was blurred, yet it was judged offside by a tiny margin. I'm not sure how they can call it definitively offside, when you cannot determine the exact moment when the ball left the passing players foot. Doesn't detract from an abysmal performance where we were very lucky to get the first penalty. Bat's did a good job getting the wrong side of Lamptey and Lamptey shouldn't have gone into the back of him using his hands. Well bought from clumsy defending.
|
|
|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Dyche is unarguably more attack minded than Roy - he’s just direct. Their approach is about getting balls into the box, and invariably these leads to chances and goals. They’re also far more dangerous from set pieces. If you can find it have a look at the thread from when they beat us at Selhurst last year.. they played us off the park. They also have a vastly inferior squad to us on paper. I don’t disagree with that assessment - a more attack minded manager would get a lot more out of Bats, Eze, Benteke, Zaha and Townsend and a few others. Defence may not be as strong though with less cover? In truth as much as I love us being in the prem the matches at the end of last season together with the last two have been truly awful to watch. Not sure I can handle watching this type of football much longer unless it’s just a blip? The next 4 matches may just decide Hodgson’s future at the helm?
|
|
|
Parish should have realised to buy a manager like Roy a flare player like Eze is like buying somebody with no musical knowledge a guitar for Christmas
|
|
|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
One thing for Dyche though. Surely he would shout at the players and say it outright to the press that our performance was shyte. Sick of hearing 'we were good defensively until they scored...' You want a manager that shouts and slags off his team to the media. There is no need to pay millions for a manager, anyone can do that, you set your criteria very low in your expectations.
|
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.