This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Visit the current forum | Forum Rules
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
BJ outflanking Sir Keir in serial dumbness. Why would you accept a donation from some Lord to have your flat done up. You just can't do that sort of thing in his position. Cue desperate tories saying it is above board.
This is all about local elections. A laughable attempt by Labour and the Leftist media to create some 'bad news' about Boris at a time when things are getting positive. Predictable, pathetic and utterly tedious.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This is all about local elections. A laughable attempt by Labour and the Leftist media to create some 'bad news' about Boris at a time when things are getting positive. Predictable, pathetic and utterly tedious. Accurate description,Sir Quere is becoming increasingly desperate and tedious.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
This is all about local elections. A laughable attempt by Labour and the Leftist media to create some 'bad news' about Boris at a time when things are getting positive. Predictable, pathetic and utterly tedious.
All a lefty myth isn't it?
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wilesy01
All a lefty myth isn't it?
There is so so much to hit Johnson with at the moment and yet Labour focus on trivialities? All because Labour are desperate to not lose Hartlepool. Think about that. Labour being seriously worried about losing a seat in Hartlepool. To the Tories. After the best part of 10 years of Conservative Party rule? This is desperate, desperate stuff. And with so much other crap to be thrown? The Tories must be secretly over the moon. They should not even be in with a sniff of winning in Hartlepool. And these local council elections should be, in any conventional political metric, see them losing hundreds of seats. Instead it will be considered a win for Starmer if he does not lose a constituency that has been Labour ever since it came into being and does not lose many local council seats. Come on. Lets take a step back here and examine what this political reality is now.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wilesy01
All a lefty myth isn't it? So no Labour PM has been involved in such? Look no further than Blair, spent £350000 of taxpayers money on the flat. Introduced HR Act which made millions for HR lawyers, what was Mrs Blair’s occupation? Oh wait....
Edited by Spiderman (28 Apr 2021 3.15pm) Edited by Spiderman (28 Apr 2021 3.17pm)
|
|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
So no Labour PM has been involved in such? Look no further than Blair, spent £350000 of taxpayers money on the flat. Introduced HR Act which made millions for HR lawyers, what was Mrs Blair’s occupation? Oh wait....
Edited by Spiderman (28 Apr 2021 3.15pm) Edited by Spiderman (28 Apr 2021 3.17pm) Definitely not, Johnson was squirming throughout. The source of the funds he used he has not been answered, everybody seems to know it was Lord B. There is already a public grant available to an incoming PM for refurbishment. Tory MPs want to know too, they are getting fed up with it all the time.
|
|
|
Originally posted by croydon proud
I thought Starmer, although i think has been a very poor shot recently with such an easy target as Boris, had his spectacles on today.The way he let Boris skip over the first question over who paid for the decorating, only to make it easy with multiple choice, A,B,C or D, priceless. Boris looked shaken, I think this could be the beginning of the end for him,with lots more to come out of Cummings apparently, popcorn time. Popcorn? Pringles surely....
|
|
|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Definitely not, Johnson was squirming throughout. The source of the funds he used he has not been answered, everybody seems to know it was Lord B. There is already a public grant available to an incoming PM for refurbishment. Tory MPs want to know too, they are getting fed up with it all the time. Squirming? I’m not sure. Still shame the Labour Party have nothing else to question him on, presumably they are more than happy with present Tory policies. BJ seemed confident that he has personally met the costs, we shall see. Edited by Spiderman (28 Apr 2021 5.26pm)
|
|
| croydon proud |
|
|---|---|
|
Ha, no, pringles are best left for the member for Medway, chilli flavour.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wilesy01
All a lefty myth isn't it? Public money? You must be confusing him with Tony Blair. Cronyism is a fact of life. No one does it better than socialists.
|
|
|
Sir Keir's infantile antics making him look a pri#k highlighted:
|
|
|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Starmer is actually highly intelligent... Is he? He was the primary driving force behind Labours INSANE second referendum policy. Now if he genuinely believed it would win them an election, in face of an entire range of facts pointing to the contrary, then he literally a moron. Thick as pig s*** dumb. Or, if he pushed it deliberately knowing it would cost Labour the election and help position him to take over then it makes him bloody treacherous. Not sure if that counts as 'highly intelligent.' Certainly cunning.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
|
Originally posted by Matov
Is he? He was the primary driving force behind Labours INSANE second referendum policy. Now if he genuinely believed it would win them an election, in face of an entire range of facts pointing to the contrary, then he literally a moron. Thick as pig s*** dumb. Or, if he pushed it deliberately knowing it would cost Labour the election and help position him to take over then it makes him bloody treacherous. Not sure if that counts as 'highly intelligent.' Certainly cunning. Labour's approach in the 2019 GE was very far from insane. The problem wasn't the policy it was the lack of enthusiasm for it from their worst ever leader. Corbyn lost that election well before it was ever finally called. Offering the people a final say after a renegotiation would have forced a better deal out of the EU. If that was then rejected by the people after 4 years of rethinking then what where is the downside? We either got a better deal and a confirmation that the people genuinely wanted out, which would have laid to rest much of the dissatisfaction with the process, or we learned that even on better terms the people had reflected and changed their minds. Only the insane reject such a concept.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Labour's approach in the 2019 GE was very far from insane. The problem wasn't the policy it was the lack of enthusiasm for it from their worst ever leader. Corbyn lost that election well before it was ever finally called. Offering the people a final say after a renegotiation would have forced a better deal out of the EU. If that was then rejected by the people after 4 years of rethinking then what where is the downside? We either got a better deal and a confirmation that the people genuinely wanted out, which would have laid to rest much of the dissatisfaction with the process, or we learned that even on better terms the people had reflected and changed their minds. Only the insane reject such a concept. But renegotiation would have been a back door back in to the EU. The eu wouldn't have offered anything unless it had a catch which would be just that. Come back and let's talk. Then the UK would have been well and truly shafted alongside major domestic issues. Do you honestly think a second vote would have been be fair? Many remainers have changed their view and are now content with brexit considering how well being outside has worked during the pandemic. For that alone brexit was worth it.
|
|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Labour's approach in the 2019 GE was very far from insane. The problem wasn't the policy it was the lack of enthusiasm for it from their worst ever leader. Corbyn lost that election well before it was ever finally called. LOL. An 80 seat majority is all the proof you need to show how utterly insane it was. And if not for the Brexit Party saving Labour's arse in numerous other seats, it would have been even worse. The constituency breakdown in England and Wales of the 2016 Brexit vote was 73-27 in favour of leaving. The very battleground that Labour needed to win if it stood a hope of forming the next Government. Starmer broke with agreed Shadow Cabinet policy at the 2018 Labour Party Conference. He personally drove the drive for Labour to adopt not only a second referendum policy but also a beyond ludicrous promise that the leave deal they would negotiate would be one they would not be backing. Either sheer lunacy or else a deliberate attempt to sabotage Corybn from standing a chance of building on what he achieved in 2017. But you know all that.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2025 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.